经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 HAS-BLED 和 HEMORR2HAGES 出血风险评分的预测价值。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Texas Heart Institute Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.14503/THIJ-23-8267
Ianis Doomun, Daphné Doomun, Sara Schukraft, Diego Arroyo, Selma T Cook, Tibor Huwyler, Jean-Jacques Goy, Jean-Christophe Stauffer, Mario Togni, Serban Puricel, Stéphane Cook
{"title":"经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 HAS-BLED 和 HEMORR2HAGES 出血风险评分的预测价值。","authors":"Ianis Doomun, Daphné Doomun, Sara Schukraft, Diego Arroyo, Selma T Cook, Tibor Huwyler, Jean-Jacques Goy, Jean-Christophe Stauffer, Mario Togni, Serban Puricel, Stéphane Cook","doi":"10.14503/THIJ-23-8267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various scoring systems have been developed to assess the risk of bleeding in medical settings. HAS-BLED and HEMORR2HAGES risk scores are commonly used to estimate bleeding risk in patients receiving anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation, but data on their predictive value in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study evaluated and compared the predictive abilities of the HAS-BLED and HEMORR2HAGES bleeding risk scores in all-comer patients undergoing PCI. The PARIS score, specifically designed for patients undergoing PCI, was used as a comparator. The scores were calculated at baseline and compared with the occurrence of events during a 2-year clinical follow-up period. Between 2015 and 2017, all consecutive patients undergoing PCI we re prospectively enrolled and divided into risk tertiles based on bleeding risk scores. The primary end points were hierarchical major bleeding events, defined by Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 3 through 5, and patient-oriented composite end points according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium classification, which were assessed during the 2-year follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,080 patients completed the follow-up period. Two years after index, 189 patients (17.5%) had experienced any bleeding, with 48 events (4.4%) classified as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 3 to 5. All bleeding risk scores showed statistically significant predictive ability for bleeding events. The HEMORR2HAGES score (C statistic, 0.73) was more effective than the HAS-BLED score (C statistic, 0.66; P = .07) and the PARIS score (C statistic, 0.66; P = .06) in predicting risk of major bleeding. Patients in high-risk bleeding groups also experienced a higher incidence of patient-oriented composite end points.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HEMORR2HAGES, HAS-BLED, and PARIS risk scores exhibited good predictive abilities for bleeding events following PCI. Patients at high risk of bleeding also demonstrated increased ischemic risk and higher mortality during the 2-year follow-up period.</p>","PeriodicalId":48680,"journal":{"name":"Texas Heart Institute Journal","volume":"51 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11233982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Value of HAS-BLED and HEMORR2HAGES Bleeding Risk Scores After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Ianis Doomun, Daphné Doomun, Sara Schukraft, Diego Arroyo, Selma T Cook, Tibor Huwyler, Jean-Jacques Goy, Jean-Christophe Stauffer, Mario Togni, Serban Puricel, Stéphane Cook\",\"doi\":\"10.14503/THIJ-23-8267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various scoring systems have been developed to assess the risk of bleeding in medical settings. HAS-BLED and HEMORR2HAGES risk scores are commonly used to estimate bleeding risk in patients receiving anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation, but data on their predictive value in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study evaluated and compared the predictive abilities of the HAS-BLED and HEMORR2HAGES bleeding risk scores in all-comer patients undergoing PCI. The PARIS score, specifically designed for patients undergoing PCI, was used as a comparator. The scores were calculated at baseline and compared with the occurrence of events during a 2-year clinical follow-up period. Between 2015 and 2017, all consecutive patients undergoing PCI we re prospectively enrolled and divided into risk tertiles based on bleeding risk scores. The primary end points were hierarchical major bleeding events, defined by Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 3 through 5, and patient-oriented composite end points according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium classification, which were assessed during the 2-year follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,080 patients completed the follow-up period. Two years after index, 189 patients (17.5%) had experienced any bleeding, with 48 events (4.4%) classified as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 3 to 5. All bleeding risk scores showed statistically significant predictive ability for bleeding events. The HEMORR2HAGES score (C statistic, 0.73) was more effective than the HAS-BLED score (C statistic, 0.66; P = .07) and the PARIS score (C statistic, 0.66; P = .06) in predicting risk of major bleeding. Patients in high-risk bleeding groups also experienced a higher incidence of patient-oriented composite end points.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HEMORR2HAGES, HAS-BLED, and PARIS risk scores exhibited good predictive abilities for bleeding events following PCI. Patients at high risk of bleeding also demonstrated increased ischemic risk and higher mortality during the 2-year follow-up period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Texas Heart Institute Journal\",\"volume\":\"51 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11233982/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Texas Heart Institute Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14503/THIJ-23-8267\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Texas Heart Institute Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14503/THIJ-23-8267","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前已开发出各种评分系统来评估医疗环境中的出血风险。HAS-BLED 和 HEMORR2HAGES 风险评分通常用于估计接受抗凝治疗的心房颤动患者的出血风险,但它们对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者的预测价值数据有限:本研究评估并比较了 HAS-BLED 和 HEMORR2HAGES 出血风险评分对接受 PCI 治疗的所有患者的预测能力。PARIS 评分是专门为接受 PCI 手术的患者设计的,用作比较对象。这些评分在基线时进行计算,并与两年临床随访期间的事件发生率进行比较。2015 年至 2017 年期间,我们对所有连续接受 PCI 治疗的患者进行了前瞻性登记,并根据出血风险评分将其分为风险分层。主要终点是按出血学术研究联盟3至5型定义的分级大出血事件,以及按出血学术研究联盟分类的以患者为导向的复合终点,在2年随访期内进行评估:共有 1,080 名患者完成了随访。入院两年后,189 名患者(17.5%)发生过出血,其中 48 例(4.4%)被归类为出血学术研究联盟 3 至 5 型。所有出血风险评分对出血事件都有显著的统计学预测能力。在预测大出血风险方面,HEMORR2HAGES 评分(C 统计量,0.73)比 HAS-BLED 评分(C 统计量,0.66;P = 0.07)和 PARIS 评分(C 统计量,0.66;P = 0.06)更有效。高危出血组患者以患者为导向的复合终点发生率也较高:结论:HEMORR2HAGES、HAS-BLED 和 PARIS 风险评分对 PCI 术后出血事件具有良好的预测能力。出血风险高的患者在两年的随访期间缺血风险也会增加,死亡率也会升高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictive Value of HAS-BLED and HEMORR2HAGES Bleeding Risk Scores After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Background: Various scoring systems have been developed to assess the risk of bleeding in medical settings. HAS-BLED and HEMORR2HAGES risk scores are commonly used to estimate bleeding risk in patients receiving anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation, but data on their predictive value in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are limited.

Methods: This study evaluated and compared the predictive abilities of the HAS-BLED and HEMORR2HAGES bleeding risk scores in all-comer patients undergoing PCI. The PARIS score, specifically designed for patients undergoing PCI, was used as a comparator. The scores were calculated at baseline and compared with the occurrence of events during a 2-year clinical follow-up period. Between 2015 and 2017, all consecutive patients undergoing PCI we re prospectively enrolled and divided into risk tertiles based on bleeding risk scores. The primary end points were hierarchical major bleeding events, defined by Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 3 through 5, and patient-oriented composite end points according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium classification, which were assessed during the 2-year follow-up period.

Results: A total of 1,080 patients completed the follow-up period. Two years after index, 189 patients (17.5%) had experienced any bleeding, with 48 events (4.4%) classified as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 3 to 5. All bleeding risk scores showed statistically significant predictive ability for bleeding events. The HEMORR2HAGES score (C statistic, 0.73) was more effective than the HAS-BLED score (C statistic, 0.66; P = .07) and the PARIS score (C statistic, 0.66; P = .06) in predicting risk of major bleeding. Patients in high-risk bleeding groups also experienced a higher incidence of patient-oriented composite end points.

Conclusions: The HEMORR2HAGES, HAS-BLED, and PARIS risk scores exhibited good predictive abilities for bleeding events following PCI. Patients at high risk of bleeding also demonstrated increased ischemic risk and higher mortality during the 2-year follow-up period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Texas Heart Institute Journal
Texas Heart Institute Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
11.10%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: For more than 45 years, the Texas Heart Institute Journal has been published by the Texas Heart Institute as part of its medical education program. Our bimonthly peer-reviewed journal enjoys a global audience of physicians, scientists, and healthcare professionals who are contributing to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cardiovascular disease. The Journal was printed under the name of Cardiovascular Diseases from 1974 through 1981 (ISSN 0093-3546). The name was changed to Texas Heart Institute Journal in 1982 and was printed through 2013 (ISSN 0730-2347). In 2014, the Journal moved to online-only publication. It is indexed by Index Medicus/MEDLINE and by other indexing and abstracting services worldwide. Our full archive is available at PubMed Central. The Journal invites authors to submit these article types for review: -Clinical Investigations- Laboratory Investigations- Reviews- Techniques- Coronary Anomalies- History of Medicine- Case Reports/Case Series (Submission Fee: $70.00 USD)- Images in Cardiovascular Medicine (Submission Fee: $35.00 USD)- Guest Editorials- Peabody’s Corner- Letters to the Editor
期刊最新文献
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Bailout for Severe Aortic Insufficiency due to Aortic Root Dissection Following Ascending Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Surgical Treatment of Brachiocephalic Artery Aneurysm With Impending Rupture and Tracheal Communication. Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-Facilitated Large-Bore Catheter Embolectomy in the Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Complicated by Shock. A Comprehensive Review of Atrial Infarction. Effects of Bioprosthetic Valve Fracturing on Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Transvalvular Gradients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1