GPT-4 在中国护理考试中的表现:使用大语言模型进行人工智能辅助护理教育的潜力。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nurse Educator Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1097/NNE.0000000000001679
Yiqun Miao, Yuan Luo, Yuhan Zhao, Jiawei Li, Mingxuan Liu, Huiying Wang, Yuling Chen, Ying Wu
{"title":"GPT-4 在中国护理考试中的表现:使用大语言模型进行人工智能辅助护理教育的潜力。","authors":"Yiqun Miao, Yuan Luo, Yuhan Zhao, Jiawei Li, Mingxuan Liu, Huiying Wang, Yuling Chen, Ying Wu","doi":"10.1097/NNE.0000000000001679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The performance of GPT-4 in nursing examinations within the Chinese context has not yet been thoroughly evaluated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the performance of GPT-4 on multiple-choice and open-ended questions derived from nursing examinations in the Chinese context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data sets of the Chinese National Nursing Licensure Examination spanning 2021 to 2023 were used to evaluate the accuracy of GPT-4 in multiple-choice questions. The performance of GPT-4 on open-ended questions was examined using 18 case-based questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For multiple-choice questions, GPT-4 achieved an accuracy of 71.0% (511/720). For open-ended questions, the responses were evaluated for cosine similarity, logical consistency, and information quality, all of which were found to be at a moderate level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPT-4 performed well at addressing queries on basic knowledge. However, it has notable limitations in answering open-ended questions. Nursing educators should weigh the benefits and challenges of GPT-4 for integration into nursing education.</p>","PeriodicalId":54706,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Educator","volume":" ","pages":"E338-E343"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of GPT-4 on Chinese Nursing Examination: Potentials for AI-Assisted Nursing Education Using Large Language Models.\",\"authors\":\"Yiqun Miao, Yuan Luo, Yuhan Zhao, Jiawei Li, Mingxuan Liu, Huiying Wang, Yuling Chen, Ying Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NNE.0000000000001679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The performance of GPT-4 in nursing examinations within the Chinese context has not yet been thoroughly evaluated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the performance of GPT-4 on multiple-choice and open-ended questions derived from nursing examinations in the Chinese context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data sets of the Chinese National Nursing Licensure Examination spanning 2021 to 2023 were used to evaluate the accuracy of GPT-4 in multiple-choice questions. The performance of GPT-4 on open-ended questions was examined using 18 case-based questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For multiple-choice questions, GPT-4 achieved an accuracy of 71.0% (511/720). For open-ended questions, the responses were evaluated for cosine similarity, logical consistency, and information quality, all of which were found to be at a moderate level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPT-4 performed well at addressing queries on basic knowledge. However, it has notable limitations in answering open-ended questions. Nursing educators should weigh the benefits and challenges of GPT-4 for integration into nursing education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Educator\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"E338-E343\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Educator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001679\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Educator","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001679","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景GPT-4 在中国护理考试中的表现尚未得到全面评估:评估 GPT-4 在中国护理考试选择题和开放性试题中的表现:方法:使用 2021 年至 2023 年中国国家护士执业资格考试的数据集来评估 GPT-4 在多项选择题中的准确性。结果:在多项选择题中,GPT-4的准确率为100%;在开放式问题中,GPT-4的准确率为100%;在18道案例题中,GPT-4的准确率为100%:在多项选择题中,GPT-4 的准确率为 71.0%(511/720)。对于开放式问题,对回答的余弦相似性、逻辑一致性和信息质量进行了评估,结果发现所有这些都处于中等水平:结论:GPT-4 在解决基础知识查询方面表现良好。结论:GPT-4 在回答基础知识询问方面表现良好,但在回答开放式问题方面有明显的局限性。护理教育者应权衡 GPT-4 的优势和挑战,以便将其纳入护理教育中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance of GPT-4 on Chinese Nursing Examination: Potentials for AI-Assisted Nursing Education Using Large Language Models.

Background: The performance of GPT-4 in nursing examinations within the Chinese context has not yet been thoroughly evaluated.

Objective: To assess the performance of GPT-4 on multiple-choice and open-ended questions derived from nursing examinations in the Chinese context.

Methods: The data sets of the Chinese National Nursing Licensure Examination spanning 2021 to 2023 were used to evaluate the accuracy of GPT-4 in multiple-choice questions. The performance of GPT-4 on open-ended questions was examined using 18 case-based questions.

Results: For multiple-choice questions, GPT-4 achieved an accuracy of 71.0% (511/720). For open-ended questions, the responses were evaluated for cosine similarity, logical consistency, and information quality, all of which were found to be at a moderate level.

Conclusion: GPT-4 performed well at addressing queries on basic knowledge. However, it has notable limitations in answering open-ended questions. Nursing educators should weigh the benefits and challenges of GPT-4 for integration into nursing education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Educator
Nurse Educator 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nurse Educator, a scholarly, peer reviewed journal for faculty and administrators in schools of nursing and nurse educators in other settings, provides practical information and research related to nursing education. Topics include program, curriculum, course, and faculty development; teaching and learning in nursing; technology in nursing education; simulation; clinical teaching and evaluation; testing and measurement; trends and issues; and research in nursing education.
期刊最新文献
Innovative Bedside Shift Reporting: Utilizing the Mad Libs™ SBAR Tool for Students. Utilizing Video Feedback to Improve Student Learning. Enhancing Nurse Practitioner Student Knowledge Base and Self-Efficacy in the Care of Acutely Ill Obstetric Patients. Flexible Assessment of Student Learning Using VARK Framework. Nursing Students' Perception of the Clinical Learning Environment: A Longitudinal, Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1