COVID-19 患者的实验室结果:Omicron 与 delta 变体

Dana Avraham, Amir Herman, Gal Shaham, Arkady Shklyar, Elina Sulim, Maria Oulianski
{"title":"COVID-19 患者的实验室结果:Omicron 与 delta 变体","authors":"Dana Avraham, Amir Herman, Gal Shaham, Arkady Shklyar, Elina Sulim, Maria Oulianski","doi":"10.5501/wjv.v13.i2.90761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) virus has been a world-known pandemic since February 2020. Multiple variances had been established; the most common variants in Israel were omicron and delta.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To analyze and compare laboratory values in the \"omicron\" and \"delta\" variants of the coronavirus by conducting follow-up examinations and laboratory audits on COVID-19 patients admitted to our institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study, two groups, 50 patients in each group. Patients examined positive for COVID-19 were divided into groups according to the common variant at the given time. We reviewed demographic data and laboratory results such as complete blood count and full chemistry, including electrolytes and coagulation parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 52%, 66.53 ± 21.7 were female. No significance was found comparing laboratory results in the following disciplines: Blood count, hemoglobin, and lymphocytes (<i>P</i> = 0.41, <i>P</i> = 0.87, <i>P</i> = 0.97). Omicron and delta variants have higher neutrophil counts, though they are not significantly different (<i>P</i> = 0.38). Coagulation tests: Activated paritial thromoplastin test and international normalized ratio (<i>P</i> = 0.72, <i>P</i> = 0.68). We found no significance of abnormality for all electrolytes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study compares laboratory results of blood tests between two variants of the COVID-19 virus - omicron and delta. We found no significance between the variants. Our results show the need for further research with larger data as well as the need to compare all COVID-19 variants.</p>","PeriodicalId":61903,"journal":{"name":"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)","volume":"13 2","pages":"90761"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11229843/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lab results of COVID-19 patients: Omicron <i>vs</i> delta variants.\",\"authors\":\"Dana Avraham, Amir Herman, Gal Shaham, Arkady Shklyar, Elina Sulim, Maria Oulianski\",\"doi\":\"10.5501/wjv.v13.i2.90761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) virus has been a world-known pandemic since February 2020. Multiple variances had been established; the most common variants in Israel were omicron and delta.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To analyze and compare laboratory values in the \\\"omicron\\\" and \\\"delta\\\" variants of the coronavirus by conducting follow-up examinations and laboratory audits on COVID-19 patients admitted to our institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study, two groups, 50 patients in each group. Patients examined positive for COVID-19 were divided into groups according to the common variant at the given time. We reviewed demographic data and laboratory results such as complete blood count and full chemistry, including electrolytes and coagulation parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 52%, 66.53 ± 21.7 were female. No significance was found comparing laboratory results in the following disciplines: Blood count, hemoglobin, and lymphocytes (<i>P</i> = 0.41, <i>P</i> = 0.87, <i>P</i> = 0.97). Omicron and delta variants have higher neutrophil counts, though they are not significantly different (<i>P</i> = 0.38). Coagulation tests: Activated paritial thromoplastin test and international normalized ratio (<i>P</i> = 0.72, <i>P</i> = 0.68). We found no significance of abnormality for all electrolytes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study compares laboratory results of blood tests between two variants of the COVID-19 virus - omicron and delta. We found no significance between the variants. Our results show the need for further research with larger data as well as the need to compare all COVID-19 variants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":61903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"90761\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11229843/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1089\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5501/wjv.v13.i2.90761\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5501/wjv.v13.i2.90761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自 2020 年 2 月以来,冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)病毒已成为世界知名的大流行病。目的:通过对本机构收治的 COVID-19 患者进行随访检查和实验室审核,分析和比较冠状病毒 "ocmicron "和 "delta "变种的实验室值:回顾性研究,分为两组,每组 50 名患者。方法:回顾性研究,分为两组,每组 50 名患者。COVID-19 检测呈阳性的患者根据特定时间的常见变体分为几组。我们回顾了人口统计学数据和实验室检查结果,如全血计数和全套生化指标,包括电解质和凝血指标:平均年龄为 52%,女性(66.53±21.7)岁。以下项目的实验室结果比较无显著性差异:血细胞计数、血红蛋白和淋巴细胞(P = 0.41、P = 0.87、P = 0.97)。Omicron 和 delta 变体的中性粒细胞计数较高,但差异不大(P = 0.38)。凝血试验:活化旁血栓形成试验和国际正常化比率(P = 0.72,P = 0.68)。我们发现所有电解质的异常均无显著性:本研究比较了 COVID-19 病毒的两个变种--omicron 和 delta--的血液化验结果。我们发现这两种变体之间没有显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,有必要利用更多数据开展进一步研究,并有必要对所有 COVID-19 变体进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lab results of COVID-19 patients: Omicron vs delta variants.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) virus has been a world-known pandemic since February 2020. Multiple variances had been established; the most common variants in Israel were omicron and delta.

Aim: To analyze and compare laboratory values in the "omicron" and "delta" variants of the coronavirus by conducting follow-up examinations and laboratory audits on COVID-19 patients admitted to our institution.

Methods: A retrospective study, two groups, 50 patients in each group. Patients examined positive for COVID-19 were divided into groups according to the common variant at the given time. We reviewed demographic data and laboratory results such as complete blood count and full chemistry, including electrolytes and coagulation parameters.

Results: The mean age was 52%, 66.53 ± 21.7 were female. No significance was found comparing laboratory results in the following disciplines: Blood count, hemoglobin, and lymphocytes (P = 0.41, P = 0.87, P = 0.97). Omicron and delta variants have higher neutrophil counts, though they are not significantly different (P = 0.38). Coagulation tests: Activated paritial thromoplastin test and international normalized ratio (P = 0.72, P = 0.68). We found no significance of abnormality for all electrolytes.

Conclusion: The study compares laboratory results of blood tests between two variants of the COVID-19 virus - omicron and delta. We found no significance between the variants. Our results show the need for further research with larger data as well as the need to compare all COVID-19 variants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
171
期刊最新文献
Ambispective epidemiological observational study of varicella-zoster virus infection: An 18 year-single-center Bulgarian experience. Dengue outbreaks in northern Nigeria: Evaluating the recommended Takeda vaccine and future prevention strategies. Dosage and utilization of dexamethasone in the management of COVID-19: A critical review. Human immunodeficiency virus cascade-continuum of care stages and outcomes in a hospital in southern Brazil. Plant-based vaccines against viral hepatitis: A panoptic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1