集体维护

Erik Madsen, Eran Shmaya
{"title":"集体维护","authors":"Erik Madsen, Eran Shmaya","doi":"arxiv-2407.05196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We design mechanisms for maintaining public goods which require periodic\nnon-monetary contributions. Utilitarian welfare is maximized by concentrating\ncontributions among low-cost group members, but such policies generally induce\nsome members to leave the group or misreport their preferences. To forestall\nexit, contributions must be shifted from members with intermediate costs to\nsome high-cost members. To deter misreporting, members must be screened using\nup to two membership tiers, which reward larger contributions with increased\naccess to the good. We apply our results to the design of platforms such as\nNetflix and TikTok hosting crowd-sourced recommendation engines, which function\nas public goods supported by user feedback about new content.","PeriodicalId":501188,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collective Upkeep\",\"authors\":\"Erik Madsen, Eran Shmaya\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.05196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We design mechanisms for maintaining public goods which require periodic\\nnon-monetary contributions. Utilitarian welfare is maximized by concentrating\\ncontributions among low-cost group members, but such policies generally induce\\nsome members to leave the group or misreport their preferences. To forestall\\nexit, contributions must be shifted from members with intermediate costs to\\nsome high-cost members. To deter misreporting, members must be screened using\\nup to two membership tiers, which reward larger contributions with increased\\naccess to the good. We apply our results to the design of platforms such as\\nNetflix and TikTok hosting crowd-sourced recommendation engines, which function\\nas public goods supported by user feedback about new content.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.05196\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.05196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们设计了需要定期非货币捐助的公共物品维护机制。将捐款集中给低成本成员,可以实现功利主义福利最大化,但这种政策通常会诱使一些成员离开群体或误报他们的偏好。为了避免出现这种情况,必须将中间成本成员的捐款转移给一些高成本成员。为了阻止虚报,必须使用多达两个成员等级对成员进行筛选,奖励贡献较大的成员,增加他们获得物品的机会。我们将我们的研究结果应用于诸如 Netflix 和 TikTok 等平台的设计,这些平台承载着众包推荐引擎,通过用户对新内容的反馈来实现公共产品的功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Collective Upkeep
We design mechanisms for maintaining public goods which require periodic non-monetary contributions. Utilitarian welfare is maximized by concentrating contributions among low-cost group members, but such policies generally induce some members to leave the group or misreport their preferences. To forestall exit, contributions must be shifted from members with intermediate costs to some high-cost members. To deter misreporting, members must be screened using up to two membership tiers, which reward larger contributions with increased access to the good. We apply our results to the design of platforms such as Netflix and TikTok hosting crowd-sourced recommendation engines, which function as public goods supported by user feedback about new content.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Expert Classification Aggregation Approximately Optimal Auctions With a Strong Bidder Beyond Rationality: Unveiling the Role of Animal Spirits and Inflation Extrapolation in Central Bank Communication of the US The Extreme Points of Fusions A Statistical Equilibrium Approach to Adam Smith's Labor Theory of Value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1