Mohammad R. Al-Salem , Nehal F. Albelasy , Essam El. Al-Wakeel , Yasser L. Abdelnaby
{"title":"使用三种不同的光固化时间评估三种不同正畸粘合剂系统的剪切粘接强度和粘合剂残余指数","authors":"Mohammad R. Al-Salem , Nehal F. Albelasy , Essam El. Al-Wakeel , Yasser L. Abdelnaby","doi":"10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Success of long orthodontic treatment using orthodontic brackets depends mainly on the efficiency of the adhesive system used and it's degree of resistance in the face of stresses and foresees applied during treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with three adhesive systems using different light curing times.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The 126 human extracted premolars were randomly divided into three equal groups (n = 42) depending on the type of adhesive system used; total-etch (Transbond XT), self-etch (Transbond Plus), and self-adhesive (GC-Ortho Connect) system. Then each group was randomly subdivided into three subgroups (n = 14) based on the curing time; 1-s, 3-s, and 20-s. The shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) were evaluated in each subgroup using universal testing machine and stereomicroscope respectively. The data were analyzed statistically by a two-way ANOVA for SBS, and Scheirer Ray Hare Test for ARI. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results showed a statistically significant difference in shear bond strength at the three-time points for each adhesive system (p < 0.001) with the highest SBS value in 20-sec groups followed by 3-sec groups while 1-sec groups was the lowest. However, there was no statistically significant difference in Shear bond strength between the three adhesive systems except 20-sec groups (p < 0.001). ARI showed a statistically significant difference between all adhesive systems with the highest scores in TE groups, while the lowest in SE groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>All adhesive systems provided acceptable values of SBS at all curing times except the 1-sec group in SE and SA adhesive systems where the SBS values were the lowest and below the acceptable range.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13732,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 103762"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index evaluation of three different orthodontic adhesive systems using three different light curing times\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad R. Al-Salem , Nehal F. Albelasy , Essam El. Al-Wakeel , Yasser L. Abdelnaby\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Success of long orthodontic treatment using orthodontic brackets depends mainly on the efficiency of the adhesive system used and it's degree of resistance in the face of stresses and foresees applied during treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with three adhesive systems using different light curing times.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The 126 human extracted premolars were randomly divided into three equal groups (n = 42) depending on the type of adhesive system used; total-etch (Transbond XT), self-etch (Transbond Plus), and self-adhesive (GC-Ortho Connect) system. Then each group was randomly subdivided into three subgroups (n = 14) based on the curing time; 1-s, 3-s, and 20-s. The shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) were evaluated in each subgroup using universal testing machine and stereomicroscope respectively. The data were analyzed statistically by a two-way ANOVA for SBS, and Scheirer Ray Hare Test for ARI. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results showed a statistically significant difference in shear bond strength at the three-time points for each adhesive system (p < 0.001) with the highest SBS value in 20-sec groups followed by 3-sec groups while 1-sec groups was the lowest. However, there was no statistically significant difference in Shear bond strength between the three adhesive systems except 20-sec groups (p < 0.001). ARI showed a statistically significant difference between all adhesive systems with the highest scores in TE groups, while the lowest in SE groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>All adhesive systems provided acceptable values of SBS at all curing times except the 1-sec group in SE and SA adhesive systems where the SBS values were the lowest and below the acceptable range.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives\",\"volume\":\"133 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103762\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143749624001441\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143749624001441","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
使用正畸托槽进行长时间正畸治疗的成功与否,主要取决于所使用的粘合剂系统的效率及其在治疗过程中面对应力和预兆时的耐受程度。本研究旨在评估使用三种粘合剂系统粘合的正畸托槽在不同光固化时间下的剪切粘结强度。根据使用的粘合剂系统类型,将 126 颗人类拔出的前臼齿随机分为三个相同的组(n = 42):全蚀(Transbond XT)、自蚀(Transbond Plus)和自粘(GC-Ortho Connect)系统。然后根据固化时间(1 秒、3 秒和 20 秒)将每组随机分为三个亚组(n = 14)。使用万能试验机和体视显微镜分别评估各组的剪切粘接强度(SBS)和粘合剂残余指数(ARI)。SBS 采用双向方差分析,ARI 采用 Scheirer Ray Hare 检验。显著性水平设定为 P ≤ 0.05。结果表明,每种粘合剂系统在三个时间点上的剪切粘接强度都有显著的统计学差异(P < 0.001),其中 20 秒组的 SBS 值最高,其次是 3 秒组,而 1 秒组最低。然而,除 20 秒组外,其他三种粘合剂系统的剪切粘接强度在统计学上没有显著差异(p < 0.001)。所有粘合剂系统之间的 ARI 差异均有统计学意义,TE 组得分最高,而 SE 组得分最低。在所有固化时间内,所有粘合剂体系的 SBS 值均可接受,但 SE 和 SA 粘合剂体系中 1 秒组的 SBS 值最低,低于可接受范围。
Shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index evaluation of three different orthodontic adhesive systems using three different light curing times
Background
Success of long orthodontic treatment using orthodontic brackets depends mainly on the efficiency of the adhesive system used and it's degree of resistance in the face of stresses and foresees applied during treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with three adhesive systems using different light curing times.
Materials and methods
The 126 human extracted premolars were randomly divided into three equal groups (n = 42) depending on the type of adhesive system used; total-etch (Transbond XT), self-etch (Transbond Plus), and self-adhesive (GC-Ortho Connect) system. Then each group was randomly subdivided into three subgroups (n = 14) based on the curing time; 1-s, 3-s, and 20-s. The shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) were evaluated in each subgroup using universal testing machine and stereomicroscope respectively. The data were analyzed statistically by a two-way ANOVA for SBS, and Scheirer Ray Hare Test for ARI. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05.
Results
The results showed a statistically significant difference in shear bond strength at the three-time points for each adhesive system (p < 0.001) with the highest SBS value in 20-sec groups followed by 3-sec groups while 1-sec groups was the lowest. However, there was no statistically significant difference in Shear bond strength between the three adhesive systems except 20-sec groups (p < 0.001). ARI showed a statistically significant difference between all adhesive systems with the highest scores in TE groups, while the lowest in SE groups.
Conclusion
All adhesive systems provided acceptable values of SBS at all curing times except the 1-sec group in SE and SA adhesive systems where the SBS values were the lowest and below the acceptable range.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives draws together the many aspects of the science and technology of adhesive materials, from fundamental research and development work to industrial applications. Subject areas covered include: interfacial interactions, surface chemistry, methods of testing, accumulation of test data on physical and mechanical properties, environmental effects, new adhesive materials, sealants, design of bonded joints, and manufacturing technology.