医疗保健专业人员对数字健康干预措施的态度以及对数字健康不平等现象的看法:一项定性研究

Mel Ramasawmy, David Sunkersing, Lydia Poole, Ann Blandford, Paramjit Gill, Kamlesh Khunti, Shivali Modha, Kiran Patel, Henry W W Potts, Madiha Sajid, Nushrat Khan, Amitava Banerjee
{"title":"医疗保健专业人员对数字健康干预措施的态度以及对数字健康不平等现象的看法:一项定性研究","authors":"Mel Ramasawmy, David Sunkersing, Lydia Poole, Ann Blandford, Paramjit Gill, Kamlesh Khunti, Shivali Modha, Kiran Patel, Henry W W Potts, Madiha Sajid, Nushrat Khan, Amitava Banerjee","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.06.24310027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Use of Digital Health Interventions (DHIs) for the management of cardiometabolic diseases has increased, but may exacerbate existing health inequalities. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) play a vital role in recommending and supporting patients to use these tools. There is a need to understand the role of HCPs in managing the implementation of digital health in communities at risk of health inequalities. Objective: To explore the views of health care professionals about digital health and its impact on health inequalities, focusing on cardiometabolic diseases and the South Asian population in the UK. Methods: Online interviews and focus-groups with HCPs (n=18), exploring participants' experiences and attitudes towards digital health, perceptions of patients' barriers and facilitators to use, whether they perceived any populations to be particularly at risk of digital inequalities, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their practice in relation to digital health. After informed consent, transcription and coding, a reflexive thematic approach was taken to analysis. Results: HCPs recognised the potential benefits of DHIs to improve access and delivery of care and patient outcomes, but described several barriers to successful implementation. HCPs demonstrated a good understanding of the challenges their patients face in relation to wider inequalities, barriers to health behaviours and healthcare access, and digital health. Of particular concern was the impact of increasing reliance of digital interventions in health care on the exclusion of some patient groups. Participants recommended improvement of the design and implementation of DHIs offered to patients through working with at-risk populations throughout the process. Finally, participants emphasised the importance of ensuring non-digital services remained available to ensure equitable access to health and social care. Conclusions: HCPs described the complexities of delivering care to underserved communities. DHIs were identified as a potential way to improve health outcomes for some, while over-reliance risked exacerbating inequalities. Participant recommendations related to design, implementation, and engaging target populations providing practical examples to address digital health inequalities, such as working with other sectors to take a community approach.","PeriodicalId":501556,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare professionals' attitudes towards digital health interventions and perspectives on digital health inequalities: a qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"Mel Ramasawmy, David Sunkersing, Lydia Poole, Ann Blandford, Paramjit Gill, Kamlesh Khunti, Shivali Modha, Kiran Patel, Henry W W Potts, Madiha Sajid, Nushrat Khan, Amitava Banerjee\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.07.06.24310027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Use of Digital Health Interventions (DHIs) for the management of cardiometabolic diseases has increased, but may exacerbate existing health inequalities. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) play a vital role in recommending and supporting patients to use these tools. There is a need to understand the role of HCPs in managing the implementation of digital health in communities at risk of health inequalities. Objective: To explore the views of health care professionals about digital health and its impact on health inequalities, focusing on cardiometabolic diseases and the South Asian population in the UK. Methods: Online interviews and focus-groups with HCPs (n=18), exploring participants' experiences and attitudes towards digital health, perceptions of patients' barriers and facilitators to use, whether they perceived any populations to be particularly at risk of digital inequalities, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their practice in relation to digital health. After informed consent, transcription and coding, a reflexive thematic approach was taken to analysis. Results: HCPs recognised the potential benefits of DHIs to improve access and delivery of care and patient outcomes, but described several barriers to successful implementation. HCPs demonstrated a good understanding of the challenges their patients face in relation to wider inequalities, barriers to health behaviours and healthcare access, and digital health. Of particular concern was the impact of increasing reliance of digital interventions in health care on the exclusion of some patient groups. Participants recommended improvement of the design and implementation of DHIs offered to patients through working with at-risk populations throughout the process. Finally, participants emphasised the importance of ensuring non-digital services remained available to ensure equitable access to health and social care. Conclusions: HCPs described the complexities of delivering care to underserved communities. DHIs were identified as a potential way to improve health outcomes for some, while over-reliance risked exacerbating inequalities. Participant recommendations related to design, implementation, and engaging target populations providing practical examples to address digital health inequalities, such as working with other sectors to take a community approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.06.24310027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.06.24310027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:数字健康干预(DHIs)在管理心脏代谢疾病方面的使用有所增加,但可能会加剧现有的健康不平等。医疗保健专业人员(HCP)在推荐和支持患者使用这些工具方面发挥着至关重要的作用。有必要了解医疗保健专业人员在面临健康不平等风险的社区中管理数字医疗实施过程中所扮演的角色。目的探讨医疗保健专业人员对数字医疗及其对健康不平等的影响的看法,重点关注英国的心脏代谢疾病和南亚人口。方法:在线访谈和焦点小组对医护人员(18 人)进行在线访谈和焦点小组讨论,探讨参与者对数字健康的经验和态度、对患者使用数字健康的障碍和促进因素的看法、他们是否认为有哪些人群特别容易受到数字不平等的影响,以及 COVID-19 大流行对他们数字健康实践的影响。在获得知情同意、转录和编码后,我们采用了反思性主题方法进行分析。分析结果高级保健人员认识到了数字医疗系统在改善医疗服务的获取和提供以及患者治疗效果方面的潜在益处,但也描述了成功实施数字医疗系统的几个障碍。高级保健人员很好地理解了他们的病人在更广泛的不平等、健康行为障碍、医疗服务获取以及数字健康方面所面临的挑战。尤其值得关注的是,在医疗保健中越来越多地依赖数字干预措施会对某些患者群体造成排斥。与会者建议通过在整个过程中与高危人群合作,改进为患者提供的数字健康倡议的设计和实施。最后,与会者强调了确保继续提供非数字化服务的重要性,以确保公平地获得医疗和社会护理服务。结论:医疗保健人员描述了向服务不足的社区提供医疗保健服务的复杂性。他们认为,非数字医疗机构是改善某些人健康状况的潜在途径,而过度依赖非数字医疗机构则有可能加剧不平等。与会者提出了与设计、实施和目标人群参与有关的建议,为解决数字健康不平等问题提供了实际范例,例如与其他部门合作采取社区方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Healthcare professionals' attitudes towards digital health interventions and perspectives on digital health inequalities: a qualitative study
Background: Use of Digital Health Interventions (DHIs) for the management of cardiometabolic diseases has increased, but may exacerbate existing health inequalities. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) play a vital role in recommending and supporting patients to use these tools. There is a need to understand the role of HCPs in managing the implementation of digital health in communities at risk of health inequalities. Objective: To explore the views of health care professionals about digital health and its impact on health inequalities, focusing on cardiometabolic diseases and the South Asian population in the UK. Methods: Online interviews and focus-groups with HCPs (n=18), exploring participants' experiences and attitudes towards digital health, perceptions of patients' barriers and facilitators to use, whether they perceived any populations to be particularly at risk of digital inequalities, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their practice in relation to digital health. After informed consent, transcription and coding, a reflexive thematic approach was taken to analysis. Results: HCPs recognised the potential benefits of DHIs to improve access and delivery of care and patient outcomes, but described several barriers to successful implementation. HCPs demonstrated a good understanding of the challenges their patients face in relation to wider inequalities, barriers to health behaviours and healthcare access, and digital health. Of particular concern was the impact of increasing reliance of digital interventions in health care on the exclusion of some patient groups. Participants recommended improvement of the design and implementation of DHIs offered to patients through working with at-risk populations throughout the process. Finally, participants emphasised the importance of ensuring non-digital services remained available to ensure equitable access to health and social care. Conclusions: HCPs described the complexities of delivering care to underserved communities. DHIs were identified as a potential way to improve health outcomes for some, while over-reliance risked exacerbating inequalities. Participant recommendations related to design, implementation, and engaging target populations providing practical examples to address digital health inequalities, such as working with other sectors to take a community approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems on the Performance of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Yumbe Regional referral hospital; A Pre-post quasi-experimental study design Plaintiff experiences of the medico-legal environment in Ireland “We’re here to help them if they want to come”: A qualitative exploration of hospital staff perceptions and experiences with outpatient non-attendance Improving Access and Efficiency of Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment Across Four Canadian Provinces: A Stepped-Wedge Trial I am a quarterback: A mixed methods study of death investigators' communication with family members of young sudden cardiac death victims from suspected heritable causes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1