在印度喜马拉雅山脉北阿坎德邦的巴吉拉提生态敏感区(BESZ)使用监督和非监督机器学习综合技术划分滑坡易发区

IF 1.3 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Earth System Science Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1007/s12040-024-02344-w
Meenakshi Devi, Vikram Gupta, Kripamoy Sarkar
{"title":"在印度喜马拉雅山脉北阿坎德邦的巴吉拉提生态敏感区(BESZ)使用监督和非监督机器学习综合技术划分滑坡易发区","authors":"Meenakshi Devi, Vikram Gupta, Kripamoy Sarkar","doi":"10.1007/s12040-024-02344-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Identification of landslide susceptible zones is the preliminary step to plan mitigation measures in landslide-prone mountainous terrains. The use of various machine learning (ML) algorithms has proven their superiority in terms of enhancing the success rate in susceptibility studies. Therefore, the present study focuses on spatial prediction of landslides using integrated supervised and unsupervised machine learning (ML) techniques with reference to Bhagirathi Valley, NW Himalaya. A landslide inventory of 514 landslides and 14 viable causative factors of landslides in the study area have been selected for the analysis. Three efficient supervised ML techniques, i.e., random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and k-nearest neighbour (KNN), have been integrated with an unsupervised ISODATA cluster classification technique to prepare the landslide susceptible maps (LSM) of the study area. All the models depict that the greater part of the high and very high landslide hazard zones lie in the Main Central Thrust zone and its vicinity in the Bhagirathi Valley. The accuracy of each model was determined and compared using several statistical signifiers like sensitivity, specificity, area under curve, accuracy, and Kappa index. The results show that XGBoost and RF models exhibit higher performance accuracy than KNN. The quantitative assessment of prepared LSMs of the study area was also done using frequency ratio (FR) and frequency density (FD). The results indicate the consistency of each model in the prediction of landslide zones in the study area as FR and FD both increase with the increase of landslide susceptibility levels from very low to very high in all the models.</p>","PeriodicalId":15609,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Earth System Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Landslide susceptibility zonation using integrated supervised and unsupervised machine learning techniques in the Bhagirathi Eco-Sensitive Zone (BESZ), Uttarakhand, Himalaya, India\",\"authors\":\"Meenakshi Devi, Vikram Gupta, Kripamoy Sarkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12040-024-02344-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Identification of landslide susceptible zones is the preliminary step to plan mitigation measures in landslide-prone mountainous terrains. The use of various machine learning (ML) algorithms has proven their superiority in terms of enhancing the success rate in susceptibility studies. Therefore, the present study focuses on spatial prediction of landslides using integrated supervised and unsupervised machine learning (ML) techniques with reference to Bhagirathi Valley, NW Himalaya. A landslide inventory of 514 landslides and 14 viable causative factors of landslides in the study area have been selected for the analysis. Three efficient supervised ML techniques, i.e., random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and k-nearest neighbour (KNN), have been integrated with an unsupervised ISODATA cluster classification technique to prepare the landslide susceptible maps (LSM) of the study area. All the models depict that the greater part of the high and very high landslide hazard zones lie in the Main Central Thrust zone and its vicinity in the Bhagirathi Valley. The accuracy of each model was determined and compared using several statistical signifiers like sensitivity, specificity, area under curve, accuracy, and Kappa index. The results show that XGBoost and RF models exhibit higher performance accuracy than KNN. The quantitative assessment of prepared LSMs of the study area was also done using frequency ratio (FR) and frequency density (FD). The results indicate the consistency of each model in the prediction of landslide zones in the study area as FR and FD both increase with the increase of landslide susceptibility levels from very low to very high in all the models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Earth System Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Earth System Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-024-02344-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Earth System Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-024-02344-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在易发生滑坡的山区,确定滑坡易发区是规划缓解措施的第一步。各种机器学习(ML)算法的使用已证明其在提高易感性研究成功率方面的优越性。因此,本研究以喜马拉雅山西北部的巴吉拉蒂山谷为例,重点研究了综合使用监督和非监督机器学习(ML)技术对滑坡进行空间预测的问题。研究选取了该地区 514 个滑坡点和 14 个可行的滑坡成因进行分析。将随机森林 (RF)、极梯度提升 (XGBoost) 和 k-nearest neighbor (KNN) 这三种高效的有监督 ML 技术与无监督 ISODATA 聚类分类技术相结合,绘制了研究区域的滑坡易发图 (LSM)。所有模型都表明,高和极高滑坡危险区的大部分位于巴吉拉蒂河谷的主中央推力带及其附近地区。使用灵敏度、特异性、曲线下面积、准确度和 Kappa 指数等统计指标对每个模型的准确性进行了测定和比较。结果表明,XGBoost 和 RF 模型比 KNN 表现出更高的准确性。此外,还使用频率比(FR)和频率密度(FD)对研究区域的 LSM 进行了定量评估。结果表明,在所有模型中,随着滑坡易发程度从极低到极高的增加,频率比和频率密度都在增加,因此每个模型在预测研究区滑坡区方面都具有一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Landslide susceptibility zonation using integrated supervised and unsupervised machine learning techniques in the Bhagirathi Eco-Sensitive Zone (BESZ), Uttarakhand, Himalaya, India

Identification of landslide susceptible zones is the preliminary step to plan mitigation measures in landslide-prone mountainous terrains. The use of various machine learning (ML) algorithms has proven their superiority in terms of enhancing the success rate in susceptibility studies. Therefore, the present study focuses on spatial prediction of landslides using integrated supervised and unsupervised machine learning (ML) techniques with reference to Bhagirathi Valley, NW Himalaya. A landslide inventory of 514 landslides and 14 viable causative factors of landslides in the study area have been selected for the analysis. Three efficient supervised ML techniques, i.e., random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and k-nearest neighbour (KNN), have been integrated with an unsupervised ISODATA cluster classification technique to prepare the landslide susceptible maps (LSM) of the study area. All the models depict that the greater part of the high and very high landslide hazard zones lie in the Main Central Thrust zone and its vicinity in the Bhagirathi Valley. The accuracy of each model was determined and compared using several statistical signifiers like sensitivity, specificity, area under curve, accuracy, and Kappa index. The results show that XGBoost and RF models exhibit higher performance accuracy than KNN. The quantitative assessment of prepared LSMs of the study area was also done using frequency ratio (FR) and frequency density (FD). The results indicate the consistency of each model in the prediction of landslide zones in the study area as FR and FD both increase with the increase of landslide susceptibility levels from very low to very high in all the models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Earth System Science
Journal of Earth System Science Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
226
期刊介绍: The Journal of Earth System Science, an International Journal, was earlier a part of the Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences – Section A begun in 1934, and later split in 1978 into theme journals. This journal was published as Proceedings – Earth and Planetary Sciences since 1978, and in 2005 was renamed ‘Journal of Earth System Science’. The journal is highly inter-disciplinary and publishes scholarly research – new data, ideas, and conceptual advances – in Earth System Science. The focus is on the evolution of the Earth as a system: manuscripts describing changes of anthropogenic origin in a limited region are not considered unless they go beyond describing the changes to include an analysis of earth-system processes. The journal''s scope includes the solid earth (geosphere), the atmosphere, the hydrosphere (including cryosphere), and the biosphere; it also addresses related aspects of planetary and space sciences. Contributions pertaining to the Indian sub- continent and the surrounding Indian-Ocean region are particularly welcome. Given that a large number of manuscripts report either observations or model results for a limited domain, manuscripts intended for publication in JESS are expected to fulfill at least one of the following three criteria. The data should be of relevance and should be of statistically significant size and from a region from where such data are sparse. If the data are from a well-sampled region, the data size should be considerable and advance our knowledge of the region. A model study is carried out to explain observations reported either in the same manuscript or in the literature. The analysis, whether of data or with models, is novel and the inferences advance the current knowledge.
期刊最新文献
The water budget of the Mahadayi river and its implications for the inter-state dispute Attributing impacts of LULCC on the boundary layer climate of South Africa’s eastern escarpment Lithospheric magnetic anomaly map of Indian subcontinent (LAMI-1) from Swarm satellite data Application and comparison of RBF and BP neural networks for lithology identification of Permian volcanic rocks in the Shunbei area of the Tarim Basin in China Identifying and detecting causes of changes in spatial patterns of extreme rainfall in southwestern Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1