SS66-02 在秘鲁利马的行政工作人员中验证 "计算机视觉综合征问卷"(CVS-Q)工具(2019 年)

Yessenia Huapaya, John Astete Cornejo
{"title":"SS66-02 在秘鲁利马的行政工作人员中验证 \"计算机视觉综合征问卷\"(CVS-Q)工具(2019 年)","authors":"Yessenia Huapaya, John Astete Cornejo","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqae023.0380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS) is currently considered an emerging public health problem due to the increase in economic activities associated with the use of data display screens (DDS). However, the lack of an instrument to identify the early symptoms and signs, can originate a prolonged exposure to the use of DDS and increase the prevalence of symptoms. Material and Methods A validation study incorporating content and discriminant validation of the CVS-Q instrument was carried out on administrative sector workers, susceptible to presenting risk factors associated with CVS in a company in Lima, Peru. The sample size consisted of 181 workers (91workers with risk factors for CVS and 90 workers without risk factors). Results The content validity was determined using the Aiken's method with average values greater than 0.7 for the coherence and clarity of the questions. The discriminant validity, an area under the ROC curve of 82.5% was obtained with a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 89% for distinguishing between administrative and operative workers. Reliability was analysed using Cronbach's alpha method resulting in a value of 0,87 indicating high internal consistency. The Test-Retest reliability analysis for reproducibility was significant with a value of r=0,715. Conclusions The CVS-Q instrument demonstrated discriminant validity reaching high levels of sensitivy and specificity, being specific for measuring exposure to risk factors for CVS. The reliability of the instrument was confirmed through statistical Test-Retest analysis and the calculation of Cronbach's alpha. In conclusion, the study validates the CVS-Q among administrative workers.","PeriodicalId":19452,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SS66-02 VALIDATION OF THE ‘COMPUTER VISION SYNDROME QUESTIONNAIRE’ (CVS-Q) INSTRUMENT AMONG ADMINISTRATIVE WORKERS IN LIMA, PERU (2019)\",\"authors\":\"Yessenia Huapaya, John Astete Cornejo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/occmed/kqae023.0380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS) is currently considered an emerging public health problem due to the increase in economic activities associated with the use of data display screens (DDS). However, the lack of an instrument to identify the early symptoms and signs, can originate a prolonged exposure to the use of DDS and increase the prevalence of symptoms. Material and Methods A validation study incorporating content and discriminant validation of the CVS-Q instrument was carried out on administrative sector workers, susceptible to presenting risk factors associated with CVS in a company in Lima, Peru. The sample size consisted of 181 workers (91workers with risk factors for CVS and 90 workers without risk factors). Results The content validity was determined using the Aiken's method with average values greater than 0.7 for the coherence and clarity of the questions. The discriminant validity, an area under the ROC curve of 82.5% was obtained with a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 89% for distinguishing between administrative and operative workers. Reliability was analysed using Cronbach's alpha method resulting in a value of 0,87 indicating high internal consistency. The Test-Retest reliability analysis for reproducibility was significant with a value of r=0,715. Conclusions The CVS-Q instrument demonstrated discriminant validity reaching high levels of sensitivy and specificity, being specific for measuring exposure to risk factors for CVS. The reliability of the instrument was confirmed through statistical Test-Retest analysis and the calculation of Cronbach's alpha. In conclusion, the study validates the CVS-Q among administrative workers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational medicine\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqae023.0380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqae023.0380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言 计算机视觉综合症(CVS)目前被认为是一个新出现的公共健康问题,原因是与使用数据显示屏(DDS)相关的经济活动增多。然而,由于缺乏识别早期症状和体征的工具,长期接触使用 DDS 会导致症状更加普遍。材料和方法 在秘鲁利马的一家公司中,对容易出现与 CVS 相关的风险因素的行政部门工作人员进行了一项验证研究,其中包括 CVS-Q 工具的内容验证和判别验证。样本量包括 181 名工人(91 名有 CVS 危险因素的工人和 90 名无危险因素的工人)。结果 采用艾肯方法确定了内容效度,问题的连贯性和清晰度的平均值大于 0.7。在判别效度方面,ROC 曲线下的面积为 82.5%,区分行政人员和操作人员的灵敏度为 70%,特异度为 89%。采用 Cronbach's alpha 方法对信度进行了分析,结果为 0.87,表明内部一致性较高。重复性测试-重测信度分析结果显示,r=0,715。结论 CVS-Q 仪器的判别有效性达到了较高的灵敏度和特异性水平,在测量 CVS 风险因素暴露方面具有特异性。通过测试-重测统计分析和 Cronbach's alpha 的计算,证实了该工具的可靠性。总之,这项研究验证了 CVS-Q 在行政人员中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SS66-02 VALIDATION OF THE ‘COMPUTER VISION SYNDROME QUESTIONNAIRE’ (CVS-Q) INSTRUMENT AMONG ADMINISTRATIVE WORKERS IN LIMA, PERU (2019)
Introduction Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS) is currently considered an emerging public health problem due to the increase in economic activities associated with the use of data display screens (DDS). However, the lack of an instrument to identify the early symptoms and signs, can originate a prolonged exposure to the use of DDS and increase the prevalence of symptoms. Material and Methods A validation study incorporating content and discriminant validation of the CVS-Q instrument was carried out on administrative sector workers, susceptible to presenting risk factors associated with CVS in a company in Lima, Peru. The sample size consisted of 181 workers (91workers with risk factors for CVS and 90 workers without risk factors). Results The content validity was determined using the Aiken's method with average values greater than 0.7 for the coherence and clarity of the questions. The discriminant validity, an area under the ROC curve of 82.5% was obtained with a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 89% for distinguishing between administrative and operative workers. Reliability was analysed using Cronbach's alpha method resulting in a value of 0,87 indicating high internal consistency. The Test-Retest reliability analysis for reproducibility was significant with a value of r=0,715. Conclusions The CVS-Q instrument demonstrated discriminant validity reaching high levels of sensitivy and specificity, being specific for measuring exposure to risk factors for CVS. The reliability of the instrument was confirmed through statistical Test-Retest analysis and the calculation of Cronbach's alpha. In conclusion, the study validates the CVS-Q among administrative workers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
90 years SOM then and now A better approach to mitigate the risk of airborne infections in workplaces. Bauxite mine and alumina refinery workers: mortality and cancer risk ECHO OEM virtual community of learning for primary care. Evaluation of job satisfaction and related factors in wood extraction workers in Gilan province
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1