P-037 对爱荷华州移民和季节性农业工人进行电子数据收集试点的可行性研究

Claudia Corwin, Kimberly Dukes, Linder Wendt, Maran Subramain
{"title":"P-037 对爱荷华州移民和季节性农业工人进行电子数据收集试点的可行性研究","authors":"Claudia Corwin, Kimberly Dukes, Linder Wendt, Maran Subramain","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqae023.0491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Including migrant farmworkers (MFW) in research is essential to delivering culturally appropriate health and public health interventions. Little is known about MFWs’ willingness to engage in research and the feasibility of data collection methods for this group. Methods This pilot study investigated the feasibility of surveying MFW using cellphone technology. We recruited 50 MFW to participate in automated text messaging surveys for 4-12 weeks. Participants received 4 questions per week, including mental health questions adapted from the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD2) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ2), and healthcare access questions developed by the authors. Results 49 participants answered text messages. 35 participants (70%) continued responding 12 weeks after enrollment or later, while 6 (12%) stopped participating by 4 weeks. Responses declined significantly over time (Weekly OR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.85-0.90, p < 0.001), but there were no significant differences in declines between mental health questions and other questions (p = 0.7). Discussion This study aimed to determine the feasibility of engaging 50 MFW in research using mobile texting technology. We were able to recruit 50 participants and sustain participation over time. Waning participation was likely related in part to the reality MFWs live a mobile lifestyle, have limited access to stable mobile technology and are engaged in nearly around the clock work. Importantly, academic institutions do not optimally enable the administration of community engaged research with hard-to-reach populations. Conclusion Engaging MFW in research using mobile technology is challenging but feasible.","PeriodicalId":19452,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P-037 FEASIBILITY OF A PILOT ELECTRONIC DATA COLLECTION WITH MIGRANT AND SEASONAL FARMWORKERS IN IOWA\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Corwin, Kimberly Dukes, Linder Wendt, Maran Subramain\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/occmed/kqae023.0491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Including migrant farmworkers (MFW) in research is essential to delivering culturally appropriate health and public health interventions. Little is known about MFWs’ willingness to engage in research and the feasibility of data collection methods for this group. Methods This pilot study investigated the feasibility of surveying MFW using cellphone technology. We recruited 50 MFW to participate in automated text messaging surveys for 4-12 weeks. Participants received 4 questions per week, including mental health questions adapted from the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD2) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ2), and healthcare access questions developed by the authors. Results 49 participants answered text messages. 35 participants (70%) continued responding 12 weeks after enrollment or later, while 6 (12%) stopped participating by 4 weeks. Responses declined significantly over time (Weekly OR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.85-0.90, p < 0.001), but there were no significant differences in declines between mental health questions and other questions (p = 0.7). Discussion This study aimed to determine the feasibility of engaging 50 MFW in research using mobile texting technology. We were able to recruit 50 participants and sustain participation over time. Waning participation was likely related in part to the reality MFWs live a mobile lifestyle, have limited access to stable mobile technology and are engaged in nearly around the clock work. Importantly, academic institutions do not optimally enable the administration of community engaged research with hard-to-reach populations. Conclusion Engaging MFW in research using mobile technology is challenging but feasible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational medicine\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqae023.0491\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqae023.0491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言 将农业移民工人(MFW)纳入研究对于提供文化适宜的健康和公共卫生干预措施至关重要。人们对农民工参与研究的意愿以及针对这一群体的数据收集方法的可行性知之甚少。方法 本试点研究调查了使用手机技术对家庭主妇进行调查的可行性。我们招募了 50 名家庭主妇参与为期 4-12 周的自动短信调查。参与者每周会收到 4 个问题,包括改编自广泛性焦虑症量表 (GAD2) 和患者健康问卷 (PHQ2) 的心理健康问题,以及作者开发的医疗保健访问问题。结果 49 名参与者回复了短信。35 名参与者(70%)在注册 12 周后继续回复,6 名参与者(12%)在 4 周后停止回复。随着时间的推移,回复率明显下降(每周 OR = 0.87,95% CI 0.85-0.90,p &pamp;lt;0.001),但心理健康问题和其他问题的回复率下降没有明显差异(p = 0.7)。讨论 本研究旨在确定使用手机短信技术让 50 名家庭主妇参与研究的可行性。我们招募到了 50 名参与者,并在一段时间内保持了他们的参与。参与度下降的部分原因可能与家庭主妇的移动生活方式、获得稳定移动技术的途径有限以及几乎全天候工作有关。重要的是,学术机构并没有对难以接触到的人群进行社区参与式研究的最佳管理。结论 利用移动技术让家庭主妇参与研究具有挑战性,但也是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
P-037 FEASIBILITY OF A PILOT ELECTRONIC DATA COLLECTION WITH MIGRANT AND SEASONAL FARMWORKERS IN IOWA
Introduction Including migrant farmworkers (MFW) in research is essential to delivering culturally appropriate health and public health interventions. Little is known about MFWs’ willingness to engage in research and the feasibility of data collection methods for this group. Methods This pilot study investigated the feasibility of surveying MFW using cellphone technology. We recruited 50 MFW to participate in automated text messaging surveys for 4-12 weeks. Participants received 4 questions per week, including mental health questions adapted from the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD2) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ2), and healthcare access questions developed by the authors. Results 49 participants answered text messages. 35 participants (70%) continued responding 12 weeks after enrollment or later, while 6 (12%) stopped participating by 4 weeks. Responses declined significantly over time (Weekly OR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.85-0.90, p < 0.001), but there were no significant differences in declines between mental health questions and other questions (p = 0.7). Discussion This study aimed to determine the feasibility of engaging 50 MFW in research using mobile texting technology. We were able to recruit 50 participants and sustain participation over time. Waning participation was likely related in part to the reality MFWs live a mobile lifestyle, have limited access to stable mobile technology and are engaged in nearly around the clock work. Importantly, academic institutions do not optimally enable the administration of community engaged research with hard-to-reach populations. Conclusion Engaging MFW in research using mobile technology is challenging but feasible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
90 years SOM then and now A better approach to mitigate the risk of airborne infections in workplaces. Bauxite mine and alumina refinery workers: mortality and cancer risk ECHO OEM virtual community of learning for primary care. Evaluation of job satisfaction and related factors in wood extraction workers in Gilan province
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1