{"title":"P-160 某政府机构工作场所健康与安全研究产生的影响","authors":"Jimmy Twin","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqae023.0677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Based on work by the Institute for Work & Health (Canada), a research impact framework was co-developed between the Institute for Safety, Compensation and Recovery Research (ISCRR, Australia) and WorkSafe Victoria (Australia) to measure and evaluate the impact of ISCRR research on policies, procedures and decision-making. This framework has now become a guiding strategy for ISCRR’s research translation activities. Methods This impact framework focusses on three main levels of research impact: i) research dissemination and diffusion, ii) informing decision-making, and iii) contribution towards societal change. All research carried out by ISCRR researchers for WorkSafe Victoria are now assessed for research impact. Results An audit of 35 ISCRR research projects completed between 2019-22 found that 77% (n=27) had achieved some form of impact which informed decision-making. These decision-making impacts ranged from informing internal strategies, treatment options and guidelines, and further research, as well as leading to the development of programs and initiatives. Two research projects demonstrated a connection to preliminary societal level impacts improving the outcome of injured workers. For the research projects without measured decision-making impacts (n=8), these were either too early in their impact journey, or there were difficulties in obtaining research impact metrics. Discussion The majority of ISCRR research for WorkSafe Victoria directly informs decision-making processes. The ability to measure these impacts relies on a proactive approach and champion identification. Conclusion Government authorities strive to make evidence-informed decisions backed by solid research. Research impact measurement and monitoring is important to demonstrate this process and identify opportunities to further impact progression.","PeriodicalId":19452,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P-160 IMPACTS ARISING FROM WORKPLACE HEALTH AND SAFETY RESEARCH FOR A GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY\",\"authors\":\"Jimmy Twin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/occmed/kqae023.0677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Based on work by the Institute for Work & Health (Canada), a research impact framework was co-developed between the Institute for Safety, Compensation and Recovery Research (ISCRR, Australia) and WorkSafe Victoria (Australia) to measure and evaluate the impact of ISCRR research on policies, procedures and decision-making. This framework has now become a guiding strategy for ISCRR’s research translation activities. Methods This impact framework focusses on three main levels of research impact: i) research dissemination and diffusion, ii) informing decision-making, and iii) contribution towards societal change. All research carried out by ISCRR researchers for WorkSafe Victoria are now assessed for research impact. Results An audit of 35 ISCRR research projects completed between 2019-22 found that 77% (n=27) had achieved some form of impact which informed decision-making. These decision-making impacts ranged from informing internal strategies, treatment options and guidelines, and further research, as well as leading to the development of programs and initiatives. Two research projects demonstrated a connection to preliminary societal level impacts improving the outcome of injured workers. For the research projects without measured decision-making impacts (n=8), these were either too early in their impact journey, or there were difficulties in obtaining research impact metrics. Discussion The majority of ISCRR research for WorkSafe Victoria directly informs decision-making processes. The ability to measure these impacts relies on a proactive approach and champion identification. Conclusion Government authorities strive to make evidence-informed decisions backed by solid research. Research impact measurement and monitoring is important to demonstrate this process and identify opportunities to further impact progression.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational medicine\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqae023.0677\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqae023.0677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
引言 在加拿大工作与健康研究所(Institute for Work & Health)工作的基础上,澳大利亚安全、赔偿和康复研究所(ISCRR,澳大利亚)与维多利亚州工作安全局(WorkSafe Victoria,澳大利亚)共同开发了一个研究影响框架,以衡量和评估 ISCRR 的研究对政策、程序和决策的影响。该框架现已成为 ISCRR 研究成果转化活动的指导战略。方法 该影响框架侧重于研究影响的三个主要层面:i) 研究的传播和扩散;ii) 为决策提供信息;iii) 促进社会变革。ISCRR 研究人员为维多利亚州工作安全局开展的所有研究现在都要进行研究影响评估。结果 对2019-22年间完成的35个ISCRR研究项目进行审核后发现,77%(n=27)的项目取得了某种形式的影响,为决策提供了依据。这些决策影响包括为内部战略、治疗方案和指南以及进一步研究提供信息,以及促成计划和倡议的制定。有两个研究项目显示了与初步社会影响的联系,改善了受伤工人的治疗效果。至于没有衡量决策影响的研究项目(n=8),这些项目要么在产生影响的过程中还为时过早,要么在获得研究影响指标方面存在困难。讨论 ISCRR 为维多利亚州工作安全局开展的大部分研究都直接为决策过程提供了信息。衡量这些影响的能力有赖于积极主动的方法和支持者的识别。结论 政府部门应努力在扎实的研究基础上做出有据可依的决策。研究影响的衡量和监控对于展示这一过程和确定进一步提高影响的机会非常重要。
P-160 IMPACTS ARISING FROM WORKPLACE HEALTH AND SAFETY RESEARCH FOR A GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY
Introduction Based on work by the Institute for Work & Health (Canada), a research impact framework was co-developed between the Institute for Safety, Compensation and Recovery Research (ISCRR, Australia) and WorkSafe Victoria (Australia) to measure and evaluate the impact of ISCRR research on policies, procedures and decision-making. This framework has now become a guiding strategy for ISCRR’s research translation activities. Methods This impact framework focusses on three main levels of research impact: i) research dissemination and diffusion, ii) informing decision-making, and iii) contribution towards societal change. All research carried out by ISCRR researchers for WorkSafe Victoria are now assessed for research impact. Results An audit of 35 ISCRR research projects completed between 2019-22 found that 77% (n=27) had achieved some form of impact which informed decision-making. These decision-making impacts ranged from informing internal strategies, treatment options and guidelines, and further research, as well as leading to the development of programs and initiatives. Two research projects demonstrated a connection to preliminary societal level impacts improving the outcome of injured workers. For the research projects without measured decision-making impacts (n=8), these were either too early in their impact journey, or there were difficulties in obtaining research impact metrics. Discussion The majority of ISCRR research for WorkSafe Victoria directly informs decision-making processes. The ability to measure these impacts relies on a proactive approach and champion identification. Conclusion Government authorities strive to make evidence-informed decisions backed by solid research. Research impact measurement and monitoring is important to demonstrate this process and identify opportunities to further impact progression.