{"title":"高等教育中促进可持续发展的服务型领导:基于具有科学相关背景的学者的道德行为和概念技能的政策影响","authors":"Majid Ghasemy","doi":"10.1007/s10671-024-09367-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sustainable service-led universities actively promote sustainability initiatives and service provision. In this context, servant leadership is relevant for higher education, since it ensures sustainable performance over time, encourages the idea of serving stakeholders (e.g., students, staff, and beyond), and is in alignment with the concept of turnaround leadership for sustainability in higher education (TLSHE). However, with few exceptions, the topic of servant leadership for sustainability in higher education is under-researched so far. Our study contributes to closing this research gap by examining the impact of behaving ethically and conceptual skills, as two of servant leadership’s dimensions that are closely related to the interpersonal and intellectual capability dimensions of TLSHE, on three outcomes, namely job satisfaction, affective commitment, and work motivation. Due to the implementation of higher education harmonization policies in Southeast Asia, we focus on Malaysia, as a well-established educational hub in this region, and use a sample of 449 academics with science-related backgrounds. These scholars play an important role in achieving a few of the sustainable development goals (SDGs) as well as in dealing with societies’ present and future demands through educating students in STEM areas. We find support for the servant leadership dimensions’ role in explaining and predicting work motivation via job satisfaction and affective commitment. Subsequently, we discuss the findings’ practical implications and provide recommendations for future research in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":44841,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research for Policy and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Servant leadership for sustainability in higher education: policy implications based on ethical behavior and conceptual skills of scholars with science-related backgrounds\",\"authors\":\"Majid Ghasemy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10671-024-09367-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Sustainable service-led universities actively promote sustainability initiatives and service provision. In this context, servant leadership is relevant for higher education, since it ensures sustainable performance over time, encourages the idea of serving stakeholders (e.g., students, staff, and beyond), and is in alignment with the concept of turnaround leadership for sustainability in higher education (TLSHE). However, with few exceptions, the topic of servant leadership for sustainability in higher education is under-researched so far. Our study contributes to closing this research gap by examining the impact of behaving ethically and conceptual skills, as two of servant leadership’s dimensions that are closely related to the interpersonal and intellectual capability dimensions of TLSHE, on three outcomes, namely job satisfaction, affective commitment, and work motivation. Due to the implementation of higher education harmonization policies in Southeast Asia, we focus on Malaysia, as a well-established educational hub in this region, and use a sample of 449 academics with science-related backgrounds. These scholars play an important role in achieving a few of the sustainable development goals (SDGs) as well as in dealing with societies’ present and future demands through educating students in STEM areas. We find support for the servant leadership dimensions’ role in explaining and predicting work motivation via job satisfaction and affective commitment. Subsequently, we discuss the findings’ practical implications and provide recommendations for future research in this area.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Research for Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Research for Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-024-09367-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research for Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-024-09367-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Servant leadership for sustainability in higher education: policy implications based on ethical behavior and conceptual skills of scholars with science-related backgrounds
Sustainable service-led universities actively promote sustainability initiatives and service provision. In this context, servant leadership is relevant for higher education, since it ensures sustainable performance over time, encourages the idea of serving stakeholders (e.g., students, staff, and beyond), and is in alignment with the concept of turnaround leadership for sustainability in higher education (TLSHE). However, with few exceptions, the topic of servant leadership for sustainability in higher education is under-researched so far. Our study contributes to closing this research gap by examining the impact of behaving ethically and conceptual skills, as two of servant leadership’s dimensions that are closely related to the interpersonal and intellectual capability dimensions of TLSHE, on three outcomes, namely job satisfaction, affective commitment, and work motivation. Due to the implementation of higher education harmonization policies in Southeast Asia, we focus on Malaysia, as a well-established educational hub in this region, and use a sample of 449 academics with science-related backgrounds. These scholars play an important role in achieving a few of the sustainable development goals (SDGs) as well as in dealing with societies’ present and future demands through educating students in STEM areas. We find support for the servant leadership dimensions’ role in explaining and predicting work motivation via job satisfaction and affective commitment. Subsequently, we discuss the findings’ practical implications and provide recommendations for future research in this area.
期刊介绍:
Educational Research for Policy and Practice, the official journal of the Asia-Pacific Educational Research Association, aims to improve education and educational research in Asia and the Pacific by promoting the dissemination of high quality research which addresses key issues in educational policy and practice. Therefore, priority will be given to research which has generated a substantive result of importance for educational policy and practice; to analyses of global forces, regional trends and national educational reforms; and to studies of key issues in teaching, learning and development - such as the challenges to be faced in learning to live together in what is the largest and most diverse region of the world. With a broad coverage of education in all sectors and levels of education, the Journal seeks to promote the contribution of educational research, both quantitative and qualitative, to system-wide reforms and policy making on the one hand, and to resolving specific problems facing teachers and learners at a particular level of education in the Asia-Pacific region on the other. Education systems worldwide face many common problems as global forces reshape our institutions and lives, while at the same time, the research and problems facing education in Asia and the Pacific reflect its rich cultural and scholarly traditions as well as specific economic and social realities. Educators and researchers can learn from significant investigations, reform programmes, evaluations and case studies of innovations in countries and cultures other than their own. One purpose of this Journal is to make such investigations within the Asian-Pacific region more widely known.