Servant leadership for sustainability in higher education: policy implications based on ethical behavior and conceptual skills of scholars with science-related backgrounds

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Research for Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1007/s10671-024-09367-6
Majid Ghasemy
{"title":"Servant leadership for sustainability in higher education: policy implications based on ethical behavior and conceptual skills of scholars with science-related backgrounds","authors":"Majid Ghasemy","doi":"10.1007/s10671-024-09367-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sustainable service-led universities actively promote sustainability initiatives and service provision. In this context, servant leadership is relevant for higher education, since it ensures sustainable performance over time, encourages the idea of serving stakeholders (e.g., students, staff, and beyond), and is in alignment with the concept of turnaround leadership for sustainability in higher education (TLSHE). However, with few exceptions, the topic of servant leadership for sustainability in higher education is under-researched so far. Our study contributes to closing this research gap by examining the impact of behaving ethically and conceptual skills, as two of servant leadership’s dimensions that are closely related to the interpersonal and intellectual capability dimensions of TLSHE, on three outcomes, namely job satisfaction, affective commitment, and work motivation. Due to the implementation of higher education harmonization policies in Southeast Asia, we focus on Malaysia, as a well-established educational hub in this region, and use a sample of 449 academics with science-related backgrounds. These scholars play an important role in achieving a few of the sustainable development goals (SDGs) as well as in dealing with societies’ present and future demands through educating students in STEM areas. We find support for the servant leadership dimensions’ role in explaining and predicting work motivation via job satisfaction and affective commitment. Subsequently, we discuss the findings’ practical implications and provide recommendations for future research in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":44841,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research for Policy and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research for Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-024-09367-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sustainable service-led universities actively promote sustainability initiatives and service provision. In this context, servant leadership is relevant for higher education, since it ensures sustainable performance over time, encourages the idea of serving stakeholders (e.g., students, staff, and beyond), and is in alignment with the concept of turnaround leadership for sustainability in higher education (TLSHE). However, with few exceptions, the topic of servant leadership for sustainability in higher education is under-researched so far. Our study contributes to closing this research gap by examining the impact of behaving ethically and conceptual skills, as two of servant leadership’s dimensions that are closely related to the interpersonal and intellectual capability dimensions of TLSHE, on three outcomes, namely job satisfaction, affective commitment, and work motivation. Due to the implementation of higher education harmonization policies in Southeast Asia, we focus on Malaysia, as a well-established educational hub in this region, and use a sample of 449 academics with science-related backgrounds. These scholars play an important role in achieving a few of the sustainable development goals (SDGs) as well as in dealing with societies’ present and future demands through educating students in STEM areas. We find support for the servant leadership dimensions’ role in explaining and predicting work motivation via job satisfaction and affective commitment. Subsequently, we discuss the findings’ practical implications and provide recommendations for future research in this area.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等教育中促进可持续发展的服务型领导:基于具有科学相关背景的学者的道德行为和概念技能的政策影响
可持续服务导向型大学积极推动可持续发展举措和服务提供。在这种情况下,仆人式领导与高等教育息息相关,因为它能确保长期的可持续绩效,鼓励为利益相关者(如学生、教职员工和其他利益相关者)服务的理念,并与高等教育可持续发展的周转领导(TLSHE)概念相一致。然而,除少数例外情况外,迄今为止,关于高等教育中促进可持续发展的仆人式领导这一主题的研究还很不够。作为仆人式领导的两个维度,道德行为和概念技能与 TLSHE 的人际关系和智力能力维度密切相关,我们的研究通过考察这两个维度对工作满意度、情感承诺和工作动机这三个结果的影响,为填补这一研究空白做出了贡献。由于东南亚地区正在实施高等教育协调政策,我们将研究重点放在该地区的教育中心马来西亚,并使用了 449 位具有科学相关背景的学者作为样本。这些学者在实现一些可持续发展目标(SDGs)以及通过培养 STEM 领域的学生应对社会当前和未来需求方面发挥着重要作用。我们发现,服务型领导维度在通过工作满意度和情感承诺来解释和预测工作动机方面的作用得到了支持。随后,我们讨论了研究结果的实际意义,并为这一领域的未来研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Research for Policy and Practice
Educational Research for Policy and Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Educational Research for Policy and Practice, the official journal of the Asia-Pacific Educational Research Association, aims to improve education and educational research in Asia and the Pacific by promoting the dissemination of high quality research which addresses key issues in educational policy and practice. Therefore, priority will be given to research which has generated a substantive result of importance for educational policy and practice; to analyses of global forces, regional trends and national educational reforms; and to studies of key issues in teaching, learning and development - such as the challenges to be faced in learning to live together in what is the largest and most diverse region of the world. With a broad coverage of education in all sectors and levels of education, the Journal seeks to promote the contribution of educational research, both quantitative and qualitative, to system-wide reforms and policy making on the one hand, and to resolving specific problems facing teachers and learners at a particular level of education in the Asia-Pacific region on the other. Education systems worldwide face many common problems as global forces reshape our institutions and lives, while at the same time, the research and problems facing education in Asia and the Pacific reflect its rich cultural and scholarly traditions as well as specific economic and social realities. Educators and researchers can learn from significant investigations, reform programmes, evaluations and case studies of innovations in countries and cultures other than their own. One purpose of this Journal is to make such investigations within the Asian-Pacific region more widely known.
期刊最新文献
The role of achievement emotions in team-based learning Servant leadership for sustainability in higher education: policy implications based on ethical behavior and conceptual skills of scholars with science-related backgrounds “It’s like giving candy to a crying child”: ethnic language policies in Myanmar as a power struggle Unpacking the path-dependent process of academic burden reduction policy in China (1978–2021) Decomposing educational inequality in achievement test scores using ANOGI methodology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1