同伴主导的急诊科行为干预对非致命性阿片类药物过量的影响:"领航员 "随机对照试验的 18 个月结果。

IF 5.2 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Addiction Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1111/add.16581
Laura C Chambers, Yu Li, Benjamin D Hallowell, Kirsten J Langdon, Elizabeth A Samuels, Linda A Mahoney, Francesca L Beaudoin, Brandon D L Marshall
{"title":"同伴主导的急诊科行为干预对非致命性阿片类药物过量的影响:\"领航员 \"随机对照试验的 18 个月结果。","authors":"Laura C Chambers, Yu Li, Benjamin D Hallowell, Kirsten J Langdon, Elizabeth A Samuels, Linda A Mahoney, Francesca L Beaudoin, Brandon D L Marshall","doi":"10.1111/add.16581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Emergency departments (EDs) provide an opportunity to identify people at risk of overdose and reduce the risk. We evaluated the effect of an ED behavioral intervention delivered by peer recovery support specialists (PRSSs) on non-fatal opioid overdose.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Two-arm, randomized trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two EDs in Rhode Island, USA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>ED patients presenting with an opioid overdose, complications of opioid use disorder or a recent history of opioid overdose (November 2018-May 2021). Among 648 participants, the mean age was 36.9 years, 68.2% were male and 68.5% were White.</p><p><strong>Intervention and comparator: </strong>Participants were randomized to receive a behavioral intervention from a PRSS (n = 323) or a licensed clinical social worker (LICSW) (n = 325). PRSS and LICSW used evidence-based interviewing and intervention techniques, informed by their lived experience (PRSS) or clinical theory and practice (LICSW).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>We identified non-fatal opioid overdoses in the 18 months following the ED visit through linkage to statewide emergency medical services data using a validated case definition. The primary outcome was any non-fatal opioid overdose during the 18-month follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among 323 participants randomized to the PRSS arm, 81 (25.1%) had a non-fatal opioid overdose during follow-up, compared with 95 (29.2%) of 325 participants randomized to the LICSW arm (P = 0.24). There was no statistically significant difference in the effectiveness of randomization to the PRSS arm versus the LICSW arm on the risk of non-fatal opioid overdose, adjusting for the history of previous overdose (relative risk = 0.86, 95% confidence interval = 0.67-1.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Rhode Island, USA, over one-in-four emergency department patients at high risk of overdose experience a non-fatal opioid overdose in the 18 months post-discharge. We found no evidence that the risk of non-fatal opioid overdose differs for emergency department patients receiving a behavioral intervention from a peer recovery support specialist versus a licensed clinical social worker.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":"2116-2128"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568958/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of a peer-led emergency department behavioral intervention on non-fatal opioid overdose: 18-month outcome in the Navigator randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Laura C Chambers, Yu Li, Benjamin D Hallowell, Kirsten J Langdon, Elizabeth A Samuels, Linda A Mahoney, Francesca L Beaudoin, Brandon D L Marshall\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/add.16581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Emergency departments (EDs) provide an opportunity to identify people at risk of overdose and reduce the risk. We evaluated the effect of an ED behavioral intervention delivered by peer recovery support specialists (PRSSs) on non-fatal opioid overdose.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Two-arm, randomized trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two EDs in Rhode Island, USA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>ED patients presenting with an opioid overdose, complications of opioid use disorder or a recent history of opioid overdose (November 2018-May 2021). Among 648 participants, the mean age was 36.9 years, 68.2% were male and 68.5% were White.</p><p><strong>Intervention and comparator: </strong>Participants were randomized to receive a behavioral intervention from a PRSS (n = 323) or a licensed clinical social worker (LICSW) (n = 325). PRSS and LICSW used evidence-based interviewing and intervention techniques, informed by their lived experience (PRSS) or clinical theory and practice (LICSW).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>We identified non-fatal opioid overdoses in the 18 months following the ED visit through linkage to statewide emergency medical services data using a validated case definition. The primary outcome was any non-fatal opioid overdose during the 18-month follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among 323 participants randomized to the PRSS arm, 81 (25.1%) had a non-fatal opioid overdose during follow-up, compared with 95 (29.2%) of 325 participants randomized to the LICSW arm (P = 0.24). There was no statistically significant difference in the effectiveness of randomization to the PRSS arm versus the LICSW arm on the risk of non-fatal opioid overdose, adjusting for the history of previous overdose (relative risk = 0.86, 95% confidence interval = 0.67-1.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Rhode Island, USA, over one-in-four emergency department patients at high risk of overdose experience a non-fatal opioid overdose in the 18 months post-discharge. We found no evidence that the risk of non-fatal opioid overdose differs for emergency department patients receiving a behavioral intervention from a peer recovery support specialist versus a licensed clinical social worker.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addiction\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2116-2128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568958/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addiction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16581\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16581","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:急诊科(ED)提供了一个识别过量用药风险人群并降低风险的机会。我们评估了由同伴康复支持专家(PRSSs)提供的急诊室行为干预对非致命性阿片类药物过量的影响:设计:双臂随机试验:地点:美国罗德岛州的两家急诊室:出现阿片类药物过量、阿片类药物使用障碍并发症或近期有阿片类药物过量史的 ED 患者(2018 年 11 月至 2021 年 5 月)。在 648 名参与者中,平均年龄为 36.9 岁,68.2% 为男性,68.5% 为白人:参与者随机接受 PRSS(n = 323)或持证临床社工(LICSW)(n = 325)的行为干预。PRSS和LICSW使用循证访谈和干预技术,这些技术来自于他们的生活经验(PRSS)或临床理论和实践(LICSW):我们使用经过验证的病例定义,通过与全州紧急医疗服务数据的连接,确定了急诊室就诊后 18 个月内的非致命阿片类药物过量情况。主要结果是在 18 个月的随访期间出现的非致命性阿片类药物过量:在随机接受 PRSS 治疗的 323 名参与者中,有 81 人(25.1%)在随访期间出现非致命性阿片类药物过量,而在随机接受 LICSW 治疗的 325 名参与者中,有 95 人(29.2%)在随访期间出现非致命性阿片类药物过量(P = 0.24)。在对既往阿片类药物过量史进行调整后(相对风险=0.86,95%置信区间=0.67-1.11),随机分配到PRSS治疗组与LICSW治疗组在非致命性阿片类药物过量风险方面的效果没有明显的统计学差异:在美国罗德岛州,每四名急诊科阿片类药物过量高危患者中就有一人在出院后的 18 个月内发生非致命性阿片类药物过量。我们没有发现任何证据表明,急诊科患者接受同伴康复支持专家的行为干预与接受持证临床社会工作者的行为干预后,出现非致命性阿片类药物过量的风险有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of a peer-led emergency department behavioral intervention on non-fatal opioid overdose: 18-month outcome in the Navigator randomized controlled trial.

Background and aims: Emergency departments (EDs) provide an opportunity to identify people at risk of overdose and reduce the risk. We evaluated the effect of an ED behavioral intervention delivered by peer recovery support specialists (PRSSs) on non-fatal opioid overdose.

Design: Two-arm, randomized trial.

Setting: Two EDs in Rhode Island, USA.

Participants: ED patients presenting with an opioid overdose, complications of opioid use disorder or a recent history of opioid overdose (November 2018-May 2021). Among 648 participants, the mean age was 36.9 years, 68.2% were male and 68.5% were White.

Intervention and comparator: Participants were randomized to receive a behavioral intervention from a PRSS (n = 323) or a licensed clinical social worker (LICSW) (n = 325). PRSS and LICSW used evidence-based interviewing and intervention techniques, informed by their lived experience (PRSS) or clinical theory and practice (LICSW).

Measurements: We identified non-fatal opioid overdoses in the 18 months following the ED visit through linkage to statewide emergency medical services data using a validated case definition. The primary outcome was any non-fatal opioid overdose during the 18-month follow-up period.

Findings: Among 323 participants randomized to the PRSS arm, 81 (25.1%) had a non-fatal opioid overdose during follow-up, compared with 95 (29.2%) of 325 participants randomized to the LICSW arm (P = 0.24). There was no statistically significant difference in the effectiveness of randomization to the PRSS arm versus the LICSW arm on the risk of non-fatal opioid overdose, adjusting for the history of previous overdose (relative risk = 0.86, 95% confidence interval = 0.67-1.11).

Conclusions: In Rhode Island, USA, over one-in-four emergency department patients at high risk of overdose experience a non-fatal opioid overdose in the 18 months post-discharge. We found no evidence that the risk of non-fatal opioid overdose differs for emergency department patients receiving a behavioral intervention from a peer recovery support specialist versus a licensed clinical social worker.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Addiction
Addiction 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Addiction publishes peer-reviewed research reports on pharmacological and behavioural addictions, bringing together research conducted within many different disciplines. Its goal is to serve international and interdisciplinary scientific and clinical communication, to strengthen links between science and policy, and to stimulate and enhance the quality of debate. We seek submissions that are not only technically competent but are also original and contain information or ideas of fresh interest to our international readership. We seek to serve low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries as well as more economically developed countries. Addiction’s scope spans human experimental, epidemiological, social science, historical, clinical and policy research relating to addiction, primarily but not exclusively in the areas of psychoactive substance use and/or gambling. In addition to original research, the journal features editorials, commentaries, reviews, letters, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Effect of a peer-led emergency department behavioral intervention on non-fatal opioid overdose: 18-month outcome in the Navigator randomized controlled trial. Client preferences for the design and delivery of injectable opioid agonist treatment services: Results from a best-worst scaling task. School-based interventions targeting substance use among young people in low-and-middle-income countries: A scoping review. The relationship between cannabis and nicotine use: A systematic review and meta-analysis. What is the prevalence of anabolic-androgenic steroid use among women? A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1