腹股沟区淋巴腺切除术的并发症和不良事件:全球专家共识。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY BJS Open Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrae056
René Sotelo, Aref S Sayegh, Luis G Medina, Laura C Perez, Anibal La Riva, Michael B Eppler, José Gaona, Marcos Tobias-Machado, Philippe E Spiess, Curtis A Pettaway, Antonio Carlos Lima Pompeo, Pablo Aloisio Lima Mattos, Timothy G Wilson, Gustavo M Villoldo, Eric Chung, Aldo Samaniego, Antonio Augusto Ornellas, Vladimir Pinheiro, Eder S Brazão, David Subira-Rios, Leandro Koifman, Stênio de Cassio Zequi, Humberto M Pontillo Z, José de Ribamar Rodrigues Calixto, Rafael Campos Silva, B Mark Smithers, Simone Garzon, Oliver Haase, Antonio Sommariva, Robert Fruscio, Francisco Martins, Pedro S de Oliveira, Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri, Marco Clementi, Juan Astigueta, Islam H Metwally, Rasiah Bharathan, Tarun Jindal, Yasuhiro Nakamura, Hisham Abdel Mageed, Sakthiushadevi Jeevarajan, Ramón Rodriguez Lay, Herney Andrés García-Perdomo, Omaira Rodríguez González, Saum Ghodoussipour, Inderbir Gill, Giovanni E Cacciamani
{"title":"腹股沟区淋巴腺切除术的并发症和不良事件:全球专家共识。","authors":"René Sotelo, Aref S Sayegh, Luis G Medina, Laura C Perez, Anibal La Riva, Michael B Eppler, José Gaona, Marcos Tobias-Machado, Philippe E Spiess, Curtis A Pettaway, Antonio Carlos Lima Pompeo, Pablo Aloisio Lima Mattos, Timothy G Wilson, Gustavo M Villoldo, Eric Chung, Aldo Samaniego, Antonio Augusto Ornellas, Vladimir Pinheiro, Eder S Brazão, David Subira-Rios, Leandro Koifman, Stênio de Cassio Zequi, Humberto M Pontillo Z, José de Ribamar Rodrigues Calixto, Rafael Campos Silva, B Mark Smithers, Simone Garzon, Oliver Haase, Antonio Sommariva, Robert Fruscio, Francisco Martins, Pedro S de Oliveira, Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri, Marco Clementi, Juan Astigueta, Islam H Metwally, Rasiah Bharathan, Tarun Jindal, Yasuhiro Nakamura, Hisham Abdel Mageed, Sakthiushadevi Jeevarajan, Ramón Rodriguez Lay, Herney Andrés García-Perdomo, Omaira Rodríguez González, Saum Ghodoussipour, Inderbir Gill, Giovanni E Cacciamani","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inguinal lymph node dissection plays an important role in the management of melanoma, penile and vulval cancer. Inguinal lymph node dissection is associated with various intraoperative and postoperative complications with significant heterogeneity in classification and reporting. This lack of standardization challenges efforts to study and report inguinal lymph node dissection outcomes. The aim of this study was to devise a system to standardize the classification and reporting of inguinal lymph node dissection perioperative complications by creating a worldwide collaborative, the complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area (CALI) group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified 3-round Delphi consensus approach surveyed a worldwide group of experts in inguinal lymph node dissection for melanoma, penile and vulval cancer. The group of experts included general surgeons, urologists and oncologists (gynaecological and surgical). The survey assessed expert agreement on inguinal lymph node dissection perioperative complications. Panel interrater agreement and consistency were assessed as the overall percentage agreement and Cronbach's α.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven experienced consultants were enrolled: 26 (55.3%) urologists, 11 (23.4%) surgical oncologists, 6 (12.8%) general surgeons and 4 (8.5%) gynaecology oncologists. Based on their expertise, 31 (66%), 10 (21.3%) and 22 (46.8%) of the participants treat penile cancer, vulval cancer and melanoma using inguinal lymph node dissection respectively; 89.4% (42 of 47) agreed with the definitions and inclusion as part of the inguinal lymph node dissection intraoperative complication group, while 93.6% (44 of 47) agreed that postoperative complications should be subclassified into five macrocategories. Unanimous agreement (100%, 37 of 37) was achieved with the final standardized classification system for reporting inguinal lymph node dissection complications in melanoma, vulval cancer and penile cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area classification system has been developed as a tool to standardize the assessment and reporting of complications during inguinal lymph node dissection for the treatment of melanoma, vulval and penile cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236483/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area: worldwide expert consensus.\",\"authors\":\"René Sotelo, Aref S Sayegh, Luis G Medina, Laura C Perez, Anibal La Riva, Michael B Eppler, José Gaona, Marcos Tobias-Machado, Philippe E Spiess, Curtis A Pettaway, Antonio Carlos Lima Pompeo, Pablo Aloisio Lima Mattos, Timothy G Wilson, Gustavo M Villoldo, Eric Chung, Aldo Samaniego, Antonio Augusto Ornellas, Vladimir Pinheiro, Eder S Brazão, David Subira-Rios, Leandro Koifman, Stênio de Cassio Zequi, Humberto M Pontillo Z, José de Ribamar Rodrigues Calixto, Rafael Campos Silva, B Mark Smithers, Simone Garzon, Oliver Haase, Antonio Sommariva, Robert Fruscio, Francisco Martins, Pedro S de Oliveira, Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri, Marco Clementi, Juan Astigueta, Islam H Metwally, Rasiah Bharathan, Tarun Jindal, Yasuhiro Nakamura, Hisham Abdel Mageed, Sakthiushadevi Jeevarajan, Ramón Rodriguez Lay, Herney Andrés García-Perdomo, Omaira Rodríguez González, Saum Ghodoussipour, Inderbir Gill, Giovanni E Cacciamani\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inguinal lymph node dissection plays an important role in the management of melanoma, penile and vulval cancer. Inguinal lymph node dissection is associated with various intraoperative and postoperative complications with significant heterogeneity in classification and reporting. This lack of standardization challenges efforts to study and report inguinal lymph node dissection outcomes. The aim of this study was to devise a system to standardize the classification and reporting of inguinal lymph node dissection perioperative complications by creating a worldwide collaborative, the complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area (CALI) group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified 3-round Delphi consensus approach surveyed a worldwide group of experts in inguinal lymph node dissection for melanoma, penile and vulval cancer. The group of experts included general surgeons, urologists and oncologists (gynaecological and surgical). The survey assessed expert agreement on inguinal lymph node dissection perioperative complications. Panel interrater agreement and consistency were assessed as the overall percentage agreement and Cronbach's α.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven experienced consultants were enrolled: 26 (55.3%) urologists, 11 (23.4%) surgical oncologists, 6 (12.8%) general surgeons and 4 (8.5%) gynaecology oncologists. Based on their expertise, 31 (66%), 10 (21.3%) and 22 (46.8%) of the participants treat penile cancer, vulval cancer and melanoma using inguinal lymph node dissection respectively; 89.4% (42 of 47) agreed with the definitions and inclusion as part of the inguinal lymph node dissection intraoperative complication group, while 93.6% (44 of 47) agreed that postoperative complications should be subclassified into five macrocategories. Unanimous agreement (100%, 37 of 37) was achieved with the final standardized classification system for reporting inguinal lymph node dissection complications in melanoma, vulval cancer and penile cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area classification system has been developed as a tool to standardize the assessment and reporting of complications during inguinal lymph node dissection for the treatment of melanoma, vulval and penile cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJS Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236483/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJS Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae056\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹股沟淋巴结清扫术在黑色素瘤、阴茎癌和外阴癌的治疗中发挥着重要作用。腹股沟淋巴结清扫术与各种术中和术后并发症有关,在分类和报告方面存在很大差异。由于缺乏标准化,研究和报告腹股沟淋巴结清扫术结果的工作面临挑战。本研究的目的是通过建立一个全球性的合作组织--腹股沟淋巴结切除术(CALI)并发症和不良事件小组,设计一套系统来规范腹股沟淋巴结切除术围手术期并发症的分类和报告:方法:采用改良的三轮德尔菲共识法,对全球黑色素瘤、阴茎癌和外阴癌腹股沟淋巴结清扫术专家小组进行调查。专家组包括普外科医生、泌尿科医生和肿瘤科医生(妇科和外科)。调查评估了专家对腹股沟淋巴结清扫术围手术期并发症的共识。专家小组之间的一致程度和一致性以总体一致百分比和 Cronbach's α 进行评估:结果:47 位经验丰富的顾问参与了研究:26 位(55.3%)泌尿科医生、11 位(23.4%)肿瘤外科医生、6 位(12.8%)普外科医生和 4 位(8.5%)妇科肿瘤医生。根据他们的专长,分别有 31 人(66%)、10 人(21.3%)和 22 人(46.8%)使用腹股沟淋巴结清扫术治疗阴茎癌、外阴癌和黑色素瘤;89.4%(47 人中有 42 人)同意定义并将其纳入腹股沟淋巴结清扫术术中并发症组,93.6%(47 人中有 44 人)同意将术后并发症细分为五大类。对于黑色素瘤、外阴癌和阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结清扫术并发症的最终标准化分类报告系统达成了一致意见(100%,37 项中的 37 项):腹股沟淋巴结清扫术并发症和不良事件分类系统的开发,是为了规范黑色素瘤、外阴癌和阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结清扫术并发症的评估和报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area: worldwide expert consensus.

Background: Inguinal lymph node dissection plays an important role in the management of melanoma, penile and vulval cancer. Inguinal lymph node dissection is associated with various intraoperative and postoperative complications with significant heterogeneity in classification and reporting. This lack of standardization challenges efforts to study and report inguinal lymph node dissection outcomes. The aim of this study was to devise a system to standardize the classification and reporting of inguinal lymph node dissection perioperative complications by creating a worldwide collaborative, the complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area (CALI) group.

Methods: A modified 3-round Delphi consensus approach surveyed a worldwide group of experts in inguinal lymph node dissection for melanoma, penile and vulval cancer. The group of experts included general surgeons, urologists and oncologists (gynaecological and surgical). The survey assessed expert agreement on inguinal lymph node dissection perioperative complications. Panel interrater agreement and consistency were assessed as the overall percentage agreement and Cronbach's α.

Results: Forty-seven experienced consultants were enrolled: 26 (55.3%) urologists, 11 (23.4%) surgical oncologists, 6 (12.8%) general surgeons and 4 (8.5%) gynaecology oncologists. Based on their expertise, 31 (66%), 10 (21.3%) and 22 (46.8%) of the participants treat penile cancer, vulval cancer and melanoma using inguinal lymph node dissection respectively; 89.4% (42 of 47) agreed with the definitions and inclusion as part of the inguinal lymph node dissection intraoperative complication group, while 93.6% (44 of 47) agreed that postoperative complications should be subclassified into five macrocategories. Unanimous agreement (100%, 37 of 37) was achieved with the final standardized classification system for reporting inguinal lymph node dissection complications in melanoma, vulval cancer and penile cancer.

Conclusion: The complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area classification system has been developed as a tool to standardize the assessment and reporting of complications during inguinal lymph node dissection for the treatment of melanoma, vulval and penile cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJS Open
BJS Open SURGERY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
144
期刊最新文献
Classifying histopathological growth patterns for resected colorectal liver metastasis with a deep learning analysis. Short-term outcomes depending on type of oesophagojejunostomy in laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: retrospective study based on a Korean Nationwide Survey for Gastric Cancer in 2019. Association of postoperative opioid type with mortality and readmission rates: multicentre retrospective cohort study. Effects of the superior mesenteric artery approach versus the no-touch approach during pancreatoduodenectomy on the mobilization of circulating tumour cells and clusters in pancreatic cancer (CETUPANC): randomized clinical trial. Reported outcomes in studies of intermittent claudication - first step toward a core outcome set: systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1