血液标记物与左心房阑尾闭塞后血栓和出血事件发生的关系。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1159/000540240
Errol Aarnink, Domenico Della Rocca, Pedro Cepas-Guillen, Tomás Benito-González, Amin Polzin, Luca Branca, Daniel Spoon, Marianna Adamo, Xavier Freixa, Andrea Natale, Lucas V A Boersma
{"title":"血液标记物与左心房阑尾闭塞后血栓和出血事件发生的关系。","authors":"Errol Aarnink, Domenico Della Rocca, Pedro Cepas-Guillen, Tomás Benito-González, Amin Polzin, Luca Branca, Daniel Spoon, Marianna Adamo, Xavier Freixa, Andrea Natale, Lucas V A Boersma","doi":"10.1159/000540240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) are at increased risk for bleeding or thromboembolic events. Concurrently, biomarkers are of growing importance in risk stratification for atrial fibrillation patients. We aimed to evaluate the association of hematological markers and clinical characteristics with the occurrence of thromboembolic and bleeding events following LAAO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven implanting centers retrospectively gathered data on hematological markers (i.e., platelet count [PC], mean platelet volume [MPV], and fibrinogen) prior to LAAO. Prespecified thromboembolic and major bleeding outcomes were collected and the association with pre-procedural hematological markers and clinical characteristics was evaluated using Cox regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1,315 patients were included (74 ± 9 years, 36% female, CHA2DS2-VASc 4.3 ± 1.5, HAS-BLED 3.3 ± 1.1). Over a total follow-up duration of 2,682 patient years, 77 thromboembolic events and 107 major bleeding events occurred after LAAO. Baseline PC was the only biomarker showing a signal for a relation to thromboembolic events (HR 1.18, 95% CI: 1.00-1.39) per 50*109 increment, p = 0.056). Thrombotic event rates, including device-related thrombus, increased within higher PC quartiles. Thromboembolism was associated with age (HR 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00-1.10, per year increase) and prior thromboembolism (HR 2.08, 95% CI: 1.07-4.03), but with none of the biomarkers in multivariate analysis. No association of any of the hematological markers with major bleeding was observed. Major bleeding following LAAO was associated with prior major bleeding (HR 5.27, 95% CI: 2.71-10.22), renal disease (HR 1.93, 95% CI: 1.17-3.18), and discharge on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (HR 1.71, 95% CI: 1.05-2.77).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most thrombotic events occurred in the highest PC quartile, but no association of any of the hematological markers with thromboembolism or major bleeding was observed in our analysis. In multivariate analysis, older age and prior thromboembolism were associated with thromboembolism. Prior major bleeding, renal disease and discharge on DAPT were multivariate predictors of major bleeding after LAAO.</p>","PeriodicalId":9391,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Association of Hematological Markers with Occurrence of Thrombotic and Bleeding Events following Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.\",\"authors\":\"Errol Aarnink, Domenico Della Rocca, Pedro Cepas-Guillen, Tomás Benito-González, Amin Polzin, Luca Branca, Daniel Spoon, Marianna Adamo, Xavier Freixa, Andrea Natale, Lucas V A Boersma\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000540240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) are at increased risk for bleeding or thromboembolic events. Concurrently, biomarkers are of growing importance in risk stratification for atrial fibrillation patients. We aimed to evaluate the association of hematological markers and clinical characteristics with the occurrence of thromboembolic and bleeding events following LAAO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven implanting centers retrospectively gathered data on hematological markers (i.e., platelet count [PC], mean platelet volume [MPV], and fibrinogen) prior to LAAO. Prespecified thromboembolic and major bleeding outcomes were collected and the association with pre-procedural hematological markers and clinical characteristics was evaluated using Cox regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1,315 patients were included (74 ± 9 years, 36% female, CHA2DS2-VASc 4.3 ± 1.5, HAS-BLED 3.3 ± 1.1). Over a total follow-up duration of 2,682 patient years, 77 thromboembolic events and 107 major bleeding events occurred after LAAO. Baseline PC was the only biomarker showing a signal for a relation to thromboembolic events (HR 1.18, 95% CI: 1.00-1.39) per 50*109 increment, p = 0.056). Thrombotic event rates, including device-related thrombus, increased within higher PC quartiles. Thromboembolism was associated with age (HR 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00-1.10, per year increase) and prior thromboembolism (HR 2.08, 95% CI: 1.07-4.03), but with none of the biomarkers in multivariate analysis. No association of any of the hematological markers with major bleeding was observed. Major bleeding following LAAO was associated with prior major bleeding (HR 5.27, 95% CI: 2.71-10.22), renal disease (HR 1.93, 95% CI: 1.17-3.18), and discharge on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (HR 1.71, 95% CI: 1.05-2.77).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most thrombotic events occurred in the highest PC quartile, but no association of any of the hematological markers with thromboembolism or major bleeding was observed in our analysis. In multivariate analysis, older age and prior thromboembolism were associated with thromboembolism. Prior major bleeding, renal disease and discharge on DAPT were multivariate predictors of major bleeding after LAAO.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540240\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540240","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:接受左心房阑尾封堵术(LAAO)的患者发生出血或血栓栓塞事件的风险增加。与此同时,生物标志物在心房颤动患者的风险分层中也越来越重要。我们的目的是评估血液标记物和临床特征与 LAAO 术后血栓栓塞和出血事件发生的相关性。方法 七家植入中心回顾性收集了 LAAO 术前血液学指标(即血小板计数(PC)、平均血小板体积(MPV)和纤维蛋白原)的数据。收集了预设的血栓栓塞和大出血结果,并使用 Cox 回归分析评估了与术前血液学指标和临床特征的关系。结果 共纳入 1315 例患者(74±9 岁,36% 为女性,CHA2DS2-VASc 4.3±1.5,HAS-BLED 3.3±1.1)。在2682年的总随访时间内,LAAO术后共发生77起血栓栓塞事件和107起大出血事件。基线 PC 是唯一显示与血栓栓塞事件相关的生物标志物(每 50*109 增量 HR 1.18,95% CI:1.00-1.39,P=0.056)。血栓事件发生率(包括器械相关血栓)在 PC 四分位数越高时越高。血栓栓塞与年龄(HR 1.05,95% CI:1.00-1.10,每增加一年)和既往血栓栓塞(HR 2.08,95% CI:1.07-4.03)有关,但在多变量分析中与所有生物标志物均无关。没有观察到任何血液学标志物与大出血有关。LAAO术后大出血与既往大出血(HR 5.27,95% CI:2.71-10.22)、肾脏疾病(HR 1.93,95% CI:1.17-3.18)和出院时接受双联抗血小板治疗(HR 1.71,95% CI:1.05-2.77)有关。结论 大多数血栓事件发生在 PC 值最高的四分位数,但在我们的分析中没有发现任何血液学指标与血栓栓塞或大出血有关。在多变量分析中,年龄较大和既往血栓栓塞与血栓栓塞有关。既往大出血、肾病和出院后接受 DAPT 是 LAAO 后大出血的多变量预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Association of Hematological Markers with Occurrence of Thrombotic and Bleeding Events following Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.

Introduction: Patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) are at increased risk for bleeding or thromboembolic events. Concurrently, biomarkers are of growing importance in risk stratification for atrial fibrillation patients. We aimed to evaluate the association of hematological markers and clinical characteristics with the occurrence of thromboembolic and bleeding events following LAAO.

Methods: Seven implanting centers retrospectively gathered data on hematological markers (i.e., platelet count [PC], mean platelet volume [MPV], and fibrinogen) prior to LAAO. Prespecified thromboembolic and major bleeding outcomes were collected and the association with pre-procedural hematological markers and clinical characteristics was evaluated using Cox regression analysis.

Results: In total, 1,315 patients were included (74 ± 9 years, 36% female, CHA2DS2-VASc 4.3 ± 1.5, HAS-BLED 3.3 ± 1.1). Over a total follow-up duration of 2,682 patient years, 77 thromboembolic events and 107 major bleeding events occurred after LAAO. Baseline PC was the only biomarker showing a signal for a relation to thromboembolic events (HR 1.18, 95% CI: 1.00-1.39) per 50*109 increment, p = 0.056). Thrombotic event rates, including device-related thrombus, increased within higher PC quartiles. Thromboembolism was associated with age (HR 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00-1.10, per year increase) and prior thromboembolism (HR 2.08, 95% CI: 1.07-4.03), but with none of the biomarkers in multivariate analysis. No association of any of the hematological markers with major bleeding was observed. Major bleeding following LAAO was associated with prior major bleeding (HR 5.27, 95% CI: 2.71-10.22), renal disease (HR 1.93, 95% CI: 1.17-3.18), and discharge on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (HR 1.71, 95% CI: 1.05-2.77).

Conclusion: Most thrombotic events occurred in the highest PC quartile, but no association of any of the hematological markers with thromboembolism or major bleeding was observed in our analysis. In multivariate analysis, older age and prior thromboembolism were associated with thromboembolism. Prior major bleeding, renal disease and discharge on DAPT were multivariate predictors of major bleeding after LAAO.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology
Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
56
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ''Cardiology'' features first reports on original clinical, preclinical and fundamental research as well as ''Novel Insights from Clinical Experience'' and topical comprehensive reviews in selected areas of cardiovascular disease. ''Editorial Comments'' provide a critical but positive evaluation of a recent article. Papers not only describe but offer critical appraisals of new developments in non-invasive and invasive diagnostic methods and in pharmacologic, nutritional and mechanical/surgical therapies. Readers are thus kept informed of current strategies in the prevention, recognition and treatment of heart disease. Special sections in a variety of subspecialty areas reinforce the journal''s value as a complete record of recent progress for all cardiologists, internists, cardiac surgeons, clinical physiologists, pharmacologists and professionals in other areas of medicine interested in current activity in cardiovascular diseases.
期刊最新文献
Comparative study of the therapeutic effects of radiofrequency ablation of ganglionated plexi guided by high-frequency stimulation and anatomical localization methods in the treatment of vagal syncope in young people. Electrocardiographic strain and relationship with LV remodelling and clinical outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction by angiography-based index of microcirculatory resistance: an indirect meta-analysis. Genetic Association of the Ins/Del Variant of ACE and Risk of Cardiomyopathy: A Case-Control Study and Updated Meta-Analysis. Real-World Evidence: Integrating Machine Learning with Real-World Big Data for Predictive Analytics in Healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1