2019-2021年日本romosozumab和其他骨质疏松症治疗药物的使用模式。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1007/s00774-024-01530-6
Satoshi Soen, Alex Wang, Etsuro Hamaya, Hsu-Chih Chien, Tzu-Chieh Lin
{"title":"2019-2021年日本romosozumab和其他骨质疏松症治疗药物的使用模式。","authors":"Satoshi Soen, Alex Wang, Etsuro Hamaya, Hsu-Chih Chien, Tzu-Chieh Lin","doi":"10.1007/s00774-024-01530-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Describe real-world treatment of osteoporosis and romosozumab treatment patterns in Japan.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data for patients initiating romosozumab or other antiosteoporotic medications between March 01, 2018, and May 31, 2022, were extracted from the Medical Data Vision (MDV) and Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC) databases. Patients were categorized into four cohorts: those who newly initiated romosozumab within the first (MDV: n = 4782; JMDC: n = 2578) or second (MDV: n = 3888; JMDC: n = 2446) year after launch and those who initiated teriparatide (TPTD; MDV: n = 14,576; JMDC: n = 8259) or non-TPTD antiosteoporotic medications within the first year of romosozumab launch (MDV: n = 352,142; JMDC: n = 185,785).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age, sex, baseline cardiovascular history, comorbidities, and concomitant medications were similar across cohorts. In the MDV database, fracture history was higher in the romosozumab year-1 (59.3%), year-2 (64.1%), and TPTD (65.5%) cohorts versus the non-TPTD cohort (24.4%). Similar rates were identified in the JMDC database: romosozumab year-1 (64.7%), year-2 (66.6%), TPTD (67.5%), and non-TPTD (27.8%). Vertebral fractures were most common in all cohorts. 12-month romosozumab discontinuation varied between the year-1 and year-2 cohorts in MDV (62.4% and 58.8%) and JMDC (57.1% and 52.7%), whereas mean number of injections remained consistent (MDV: 9.7 and 9.8; JMDC: 7.3 and 7.8). Romosozumab persistence was lower in year-1 versus year-2 (MDV: 37.6% and 42.9%; JMDC: 41.2% and 47.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients initiating romosozumab and TPTD had a high fracture history. Given the dual effects of promoting bone formation and suppressing resorption, improving romosozumab adherence and persistence over time may be important for antiosteoporotic therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"653-667"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11631996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drug utilization pattern of romosozumab and other osteoporosis treatments in Japan, 2019-2021.\",\"authors\":\"Satoshi Soen, Alex Wang, Etsuro Hamaya, Hsu-Chih Chien, Tzu-Chieh Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00774-024-01530-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Describe real-world treatment of osteoporosis and romosozumab treatment patterns in Japan.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data for patients initiating romosozumab or other antiosteoporotic medications between March 01, 2018, and May 31, 2022, were extracted from the Medical Data Vision (MDV) and Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC) databases. Patients were categorized into four cohorts: those who newly initiated romosozumab within the first (MDV: n = 4782; JMDC: n = 2578) or second (MDV: n = 3888; JMDC: n = 2446) year after launch and those who initiated teriparatide (TPTD; MDV: n = 14,576; JMDC: n = 8259) or non-TPTD antiosteoporotic medications within the first year of romosozumab launch (MDV: n = 352,142; JMDC: n = 185,785).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age, sex, baseline cardiovascular history, comorbidities, and concomitant medications were similar across cohorts. In the MDV database, fracture history was higher in the romosozumab year-1 (59.3%), year-2 (64.1%), and TPTD (65.5%) cohorts versus the non-TPTD cohort (24.4%). Similar rates were identified in the JMDC database: romosozumab year-1 (64.7%), year-2 (66.6%), TPTD (67.5%), and non-TPTD (27.8%). Vertebral fractures were most common in all cohorts. 12-month romosozumab discontinuation varied between the year-1 and year-2 cohorts in MDV (62.4% and 58.8%) and JMDC (57.1% and 52.7%), whereas mean number of injections remained consistent (MDV: 9.7 and 9.8; JMDC: 7.3 and 7.8). Romosozumab persistence was lower in year-1 versus year-2 (MDV: 37.6% and 42.9%; JMDC: 41.2% and 47.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients initiating romosozumab and TPTD had a high fracture history. Given the dual effects of promoting bone formation and suppressing resorption, improving romosozumab adherence and persistence over time may be important for antiosteoporotic therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"653-667\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11631996/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-024-01530-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-024-01530-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:描述日本骨质疏松症的实际治疗情况和罗莫索珠单抗的治疗模式:从医疗数据视野(MDV)和日本医疗数据中心(JMDC)数据库中提取了2018年3月1日至2022年5月31日期间开始使用罗莫索珠单抗或其他抗骨质疏松药物的患者数据。患者被分为四个队列:在上市后第一年(MDV:n = 4782;JMDC:n = 2578)或第二年(MDV:n = 3888;JMDC:n = 2446)的患者,以及在罗莫索珠单抗上市后第一年内开始使用特立帕肽(TPTD;MDV:n = 14576;JMDC:n = 8259)或非 TPTD 抗骨质疏松药物的患者(MDV:n = 352142;JMDC:n = 185785)。结果各队列的平均年龄、性别、基线心血管病史、合并症和伴随药物相似。在 MDV 数据库中,罗莫索单抗第一年(59.3%)、第二年(64.1%)和 TPTD 队列(65.5%)的骨折史高于非 TPTD 队列(24.4%)。在 JMDC 数据库中也发现了类似的比例:罗莫唑单抗第一年(64.7%)、第二年(66.6%)、TPTD(67.5%)和非 TPTD(27.8%)。椎体骨折在所有队列中最为常见。在 MDV(62.4% 和 58.8%)和 JMDC(57.1% 和 52.7%)的第 1 年和第 2 年队列中,12 个月罗莫索单抗停药率有所不同,而平均注射次数保持一致(MDV:9.7 和 9.8;JMDC:7.3 和 7.8)。罗莫索珠单抗在第1年的持续率低于第2年(MDV:37.6%和42.9%;JMDC:41.2%和47.3%):结论:开始使用罗莫索单抗和TPTD的患者有较高的骨折史。鉴于罗莫索珠单抗具有促进骨形成和抑制骨吸收的双重作用,提高罗莫索珠单抗的依从性和持久性对于抗骨质疏松治疗可能非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Drug utilization pattern of romosozumab and other osteoporosis treatments in Japan, 2019-2021.

Introduction: Describe real-world treatment of osteoporosis and romosozumab treatment patterns in Japan.

Materials and methods: Data for patients initiating romosozumab or other antiosteoporotic medications between March 01, 2018, and May 31, 2022, were extracted from the Medical Data Vision (MDV) and Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC) databases. Patients were categorized into four cohorts: those who newly initiated romosozumab within the first (MDV: n = 4782; JMDC: n = 2578) or second (MDV: n = 3888; JMDC: n = 2446) year after launch and those who initiated teriparatide (TPTD; MDV: n = 14,576; JMDC: n = 8259) or non-TPTD antiosteoporotic medications within the first year of romosozumab launch (MDV: n = 352,142; JMDC: n = 185,785).

Results: Mean age, sex, baseline cardiovascular history, comorbidities, and concomitant medications were similar across cohorts. In the MDV database, fracture history was higher in the romosozumab year-1 (59.3%), year-2 (64.1%), and TPTD (65.5%) cohorts versus the non-TPTD cohort (24.4%). Similar rates were identified in the JMDC database: romosozumab year-1 (64.7%), year-2 (66.6%), TPTD (67.5%), and non-TPTD (27.8%). Vertebral fractures were most common in all cohorts. 12-month romosozumab discontinuation varied between the year-1 and year-2 cohorts in MDV (62.4% and 58.8%) and JMDC (57.1% and 52.7%), whereas mean number of injections remained consistent (MDV: 9.7 and 9.8; JMDC: 7.3 and 7.8). Romosozumab persistence was lower in year-1 versus year-2 (MDV: 37.6% and 42.9%; JMDC: 41.2% and 47.3%).

Conclusion: Patients initiating romosozumab and TPTD had a high fracture history. Given the dual effects of promoting bone formation and suppressing resorption, improving romosozumab adherence and persistence over time may be important for antiosteoporotic therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism (JBMM) provides an international forum for researchers and clinicians to present and discuss topics relevant to bone, teeth, and mineral metabolism, as well as joint and musculoskeletal disorders. The journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts from any country. Membership in the society is not a prerequisite for submission. Acceptance is based on the originality, significance, and validity of the material presented. The journal is aimed at researchers and clinicians dedicated to improvements in research, development, and patient-care in the fields of bone and mineral metabolism.
期刊最新文献
Osteoporosis screening using X-ray assessment and osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians in hip surgery patients. Responders and non-responders to romosozumab treatment. Multiple thyroid disorders and risk of osteoporosis: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Histological assessments for anabolic effects in teriparatide/abaloparatide administered rodent models. List of reviewers 2024.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1