扫描电子显微镜分析 5%乙醇酸作为 17%乙二胺四乙酸的新型替代品在根部生物改性中的应用:体外研究。

Q2 Dentistry Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-04 DOI:10.4103/jisp.jisp_150_23
Sruthima N V S Gottumukkala, Mikkili Rajya Lakshmi, Gautami S Penmetsa, K S V Ramesh, Mohan Kumar Pasupuleti, Vivek Bypalli
{"title":"扫描电子显微镜分析 5%乙醇酸作为 17%乙二胺四乙酸的新型替代品在根部生物改性中的应用:体外研究。","authors":"Sruthima N V S Gottumukkala, Mikkili Rajya Lakshmi, Gautami S Penmetsa, K S V Ramesh, Mohan Kumar Pasupuleti, Vivek Bypalli","doi":"10.4103/jisp.jisp_150_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonsurgical periodontal therapy results in the formation of a smear layer which inhibits tissue regeneration. Root biomodification (RB) using various agents has been tried for the enhancement of new attachment formation. However, no substantial therapeutic advantages of currently available root conditioning agents have been reported emphasizing the need for additional biologically acceptable agents. Glycolic acid (GA) due to its antimicrobial nature and ability of initiation and proliferation of fibroblasts may potentially modify root surface enabling regeneration.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighty specimens from 40 single-rooted teeth were treated with 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 5% GA and scanning electron microscopy analysis was done. The micrographs were examined for the evaluation of smear layer removal, total number of dentinal tubules, total number of patent dentinal tubules, mean diameter and surface area of dentinal tubules, and dentin erosion. Statistical analysis was done using unpaired <i>t</i>-test for intergroup comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The efficacy of smear layer removal (<i>P</i> = 0.01) and dentin erosion (<i>P</i> = 0.042) was significantly better in the GA group. Both the groups showed no difference in dentinal tubule-related parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GA showed improved RB with greater smear layer removal and lesser dentin erosion, indicating its use as a potent alternative to the conventional EDTA root conditioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":15890,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scanning electron microscopic analysis of 5% glycolic acid as a novel alternative to 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in root biomodification: An <i>in vitro</i> study.\",\"authors\":\"Sruthima N V S Gottumukkala, Mikkili Rajya Lakshmi, Gautami S Penmetsa, K S V Ramesh, Mohan Kumar Pasupuleti, Vivek Bypalli\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jisp.jisp_150_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonsurgical periodontal therapy results in the formation of a smear layer which inhibits tissue regeneration. Root biomodification (RB) using various agents has been tried for the enhancement of new attachment formation. However, no substantial therapeutic advantages of currently available root conditioning agents have been reported emphasizing the need for additional biologically acceptable agents. Glycolic acid (GA) due to its antimicrobial nature and ability of initiation and proliferation of fibroblasts may potentially modify root surface enabling regeneration.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighty specimens from 40 single-rooted teeth were treated with 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 5% GA and scanning electron microscopy analysis was done. The micrographs were examined for the evaluation of smear layer removal, total number of dentinal tubules, total number of patent dentinal tubules, mean diameter and surface area of dentinal tubules, and dentin erosion. Statistical analysis was done using unpaired <i>t</i>-test for intergroup comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The efficacy of smear layer removal (<i>P</i> = 0.01) and dentin erosion (<i>P</i> = 0.042) was significantly better in the GA group. Both the groups showed no difference in dentinal tubule-related parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GA showed improved RB with greater smear layer removal and lesser dentin erosion, indicating its use as a potent alternative to the conventional EDTA root conditioning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232807/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_150_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_150_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:非手术牙周治疗会形成涂抹层,从而抑制组织再生。为了促进新附着物的形成,人们尝试使用各种药剂对牙根进行生物改良(RB)。然而,目前可用的牙根调节剂在治疗上并没有实质性的优势,这就强调了对其他生物可接受剂的需求。乙醇酸(GA)因其抗菌性和成纤维细胞的启动和增殖能力,有可能改变牙根表面,促进牙根再生:用 17% 的乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和 5% 的 GA 处理来自 40 颗单根牙齿的 80 个标本,并进行扫描电子显微镜分析。显微照片用于评估涂片层去除情况、牙本质小管总数、通畅牙本质小管总数、牙本质小管平均直径和表面积以及牙本质侵蚀情况。组间比较采用非配对 t 检验进行统计分析:结果:GA 组去除涂片层(P = 0.01)和牙本质侵蚀(P = 0.042)的效果明显更好。两组的牙本质小管相关参数无差异:GA改善了RB,涂片层去除率更高,牙本质侵蚀率更低,表明其可作为传统EDTA根管治疗的有效替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Scanning electron microscopic analysis of 5% glycolic acid as a novel alternative to 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in root biomodification: An in vitro study.

Background: Nonsurgical periodontal therapy results in the formation of a smear layer which inhibits tissue regeneration. Root biomodification (RB) using various agents has been tried for the enhancement of new attachment formation. However, no substantial therapeutic advantages of currently available root conditioning agents have been reported emphasizing the need for additional biologically acceptable agents. Glycolic acid (GA) due to its antimicrobial nature and ability of initiation and proliferation of fibroblasts may potentially modify root surface enabling regeneration.

Materials and methods: Eighty specimens from 40 single-rooted teeth were treated with 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 5% GA and scanning electron microscopy analysis was done. The micrographs were examined for the evaluation of smear layer removal, total number of dentinal tubules, total number of patent dentinal tubules, mean diameter and surface area of dentinal tubules, and dentin erosion. Statistical analysis was done using unpaired t-test for intergroup comparison.

Results: The efficacy of smear layer removal (P = 0.01) and dentin erosion (P = 0.042) was significantly better in the GA group. Both the groups showed no difference in dentinal tubule-related parameters.

Conclusion: GA showed improved RB with greater smear layer removal and lesser dentin erosion, indicating its use as a potent alternative to the conventional EDTA root conditioning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
44 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology publishes original scientific articles to support practice , education and research in the dental specialty of periodontology and oral implantology. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology (JISP), is the official publication of the Society and is managed and brought out by the Editor of the society. The journal is published Bimonthly with special issues being brought out for specific occasions. The ISP had a bulletin as its publication for a large number of years and was enhanced as a Journal a few years ago
期刊最新文献
Lobular capillary hemangioma with an intraosseous feeder vessel through an accessory buccal foramen in the mandible: A unique case report. Peri-implant diseases: "Are we ready to take the epidemic in the offing - Head on". Salvaging the second molar with platelet-rich fibrin and photobiomodulation (970 nm diode laser) following third molar extraction. Scanning electron microscopic analysis of 5% glycolic acid as a novel alternative to 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in root biomodification: An in vitro study. Ten-year prognostic outcomes of molar survival using the Miller-Mcentire Periodontal Prognostic Index - A longitudinal prospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1