旨在降低抗血小板强度的治疗策略不应忽视冠状动脉综合征患者的缺血风险。

IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.carrev.2024.06.015
Luca Scorpiglione , Jacopo Pizzicannella , Elena Bacigalupi , Vincenzo Cicchitti , Francesco Pelliccia , Melissa Foglietta , Sabina Gallina , Marco Zimarino
{"title":"旨在降低抗血小板强度的治疗策略不应忽视冠状动脉综合征患者的缺血风险。","authors":"Luca Scorpiglione ,&nbsp;Jacopo Pizzicannella ,&nbsp;Elena Bacigalupi ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Cicchitti ,&nbsp;Francesco Pelliccia ,&nbsp;Melissa Foglietta ,&nbsp;Sabina Gallina ,&nbsp;Marco Zimarino","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.06.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>De-escalation of dual antiplatelet<span><span> therapy (DAPT) is gaining traction as a strategy to reduce bleeding risks while ensuring ischemic outcomes. Undiscriminating de-escalation, notably in patients with high ischemic risk, might expose them to </span>major adverse cardiac events.</span></div><div>Platelet function<span> and genetic tests are emerging tools to guide de-escalation, but both present specific drawbacks. Recent meta-analyses have aimed to consolidate the findings of individual trials to provide clearer insights. Yet, limitations remain for patients with concomitant high bleeding and ischemic risks. These high-risk patients are frequently underrepresented in clinical trials, and, therefore, currently available guidelines lack evidence-based recommendations for this subset. While DAPT de-escalation strategies hold promise, the choice of approach, whether clinically or assay-guided, remains complex and should be individualized.</span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":"70 ","pages":"Pages 78-84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic strategies aiming at the reduction of the antiplatelet intensity should not overlook the ischemic risk in patients with coronary syndromes\",\"authors\":\"Luca Scorpiglione ,&nbsp;Jacopo Pizzicannella ,&nbsp;Elena Bacigalupi ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Cicchitti ,&nbsp;Francesco Pelliccia ,&nbsp;Melissa Foglietta ,&nbsp;Sabina Gallina ,&nbsp;Marco Zimarino\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.06.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>De-escalation of dual antiplatelet<span><span> therapy (DAPT) is gaining traction as a strategy to reduce bleeding risks while ensuring ischemic outcomes. Undiscriminating de-escalation, notably in patients with high ischemic risk, might expose them to </span>major adverse cardiac events.</span></div><div>Platelet function<span> and genetic tests are emerging tools to guide de-escalation, but both present specific drawbacks. Recent meta-analyses have aimed to consolidate the findings of individual trials to provide clearer insights. Yet, limitations remain for patients with concomitant high bleeding and ischemic risks. These high-risk patients are frequently underrepresented in clinical trials, and, therefore, currently available guidelines lack evidence-based recommendations for this subset. While DAPT de-escalation strategies hold promise, the choice of approach, whether clinically or assay-guided, remains complex and should be individualized.</span></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine\",\"volume\":\"70 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 78-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553838924005463\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553838924005463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

降级双重抗血小板疗法(DAPT)作为一种既能降低出血风险又能确保缺血性治疗效果的策略,正受到越来越多的关注。不加区分地降级,尤其是对缺血风险较高的患者降级,可能会使他们面临重大不良心脏事件。血小板功能和基因检测是指导降级的新兴工具,但两者都存在特定的缺点。最近的荟萃分析旨在整合单个试验的结果,以提供更清晰的见解。然而,对于同时具有高出血和高缺血风险的患者来说,这些研究仍存在局限性。这些高风险患者在临床试验中往往代表性不足,因此,目前的指南缺乏针对这一群体的循证建议。虽然 DAPT 降级策略大有可为,但无论是临床还是检测指导下的方法选择仍然很复杂,而且应该因人而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Therapeutic strategies aiming at the reduction of the antiplatelet intensity should not overlook the ischemic risk in patients with coronary syndromes
De-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is gaining traction as a strategy to reduce bleeding risks while ensuring ischemic outcomes. Undiscriminating de-escalation, notably in patients with high ischemic risk, might expose them to major adverse cardiac events.
Platelet function and genetic tests are emerging tools to guide de-escalation, but both present specific drawbacks. Recent meta-analyses have aimed to consolidate the findings of individual trials to provide clearer insights. Yet, limitations remain for patients with concomitant high bleeding and ischemic risks. These high-risk patients are frequently underrepresented in clinical trials, and, therefore, currently available guidelines lack evidence-based recommendations for this subset. While DAPT de-escalation strategies hold promise, the choice of approach, whether clinically or assay-guided, remains complex and should be individualized.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
687
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine (CRM) is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to revascularization therapies in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine publishes articles related to preclinical work and molecular interventions, including angiogenesis, cell therapy, pharmacological interventions, restenosis management, and prevention, including experiments conducted in human subjects, in laboratory animals, and in vitro. Specific areas of interest include percutaneous angioplasty in coronary and peripheral arteries, intervention in structural heart disease, cardiovascular surgery, etc.
期刊最新文献
Safety and efficacy of the unilateral, suture-based, dry-closure technique in percutaneous trans-axillary aortic valve implantation. Outcomes of aortic stenosis in patients with cardiac amyloidosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The role of Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index to assess the outcomes following catheter directed therapy in patients with intermediate-to-high and high-risk pulmonary embolism. Sex-related differences in hospital outcomes after balloon aortic valvuloplasty. Clinical safety and performance of the third-generation Fantom Encore sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold: Insights from a single-center study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1