Verena T. Vaiciurgis, Annabel K. Clancy, Karen E. Charlton, Anita Stefoska-Needham, Eleanor J. Beck
{"title":"支持社会经济弱势人群与营养相关的健康和福祉:一项全国性调查的结果。","authors":"Verena T. Vaiciurgis, Annabel K. Clancy, Karen E. Charlton, Anita Stefoska-Needham, Eleanor J. Beck","doi":"10.1111/jhn.13340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>People experiencing socio-economic disadvantage face significantly higher rates of diet-related health inequities. This study aimed to explore barriers, opportunities and potential solutions in providing food and nutrition services to people experiencing socio-economic disadvantage from the perspective of services providers. The present study is part of a broad co-design model to improve service provision for people experiencing socio-economic disadvantage.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional online survey involving 33 open and closed-ended questions was distributed to Australian governmental and non-governmental organisations providing nutrition-related support to people experiencing socio-economic disadvantage aged 16 years and over. Data were analysed using frequency distributions and conceptual content analyses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Sixty-eight responses were analysed. Services are predominantly offered by charitable organisations (90%), funded through private donations (66%) and reliant on volunteers (100%). Barriers to supporting clients’ nutrition needs include financial constraints, limited community engagement, understaffing, insufficient resources and knowledge gaps. Opportunities and solutions for enhancing support include increasing government funding, advocacy initiatives, stronger community collaboration and more holistic, customised services. Proposed recommendations include establishing purpose-built facilities or wrap-around services to expand access to health services, life skills, training and educational programs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Services face challenges including volunteer reliance, limited resources and inadequate government support, hindering food provision. Client barriers include transportation costs and lack of social support. With dedicated financial support, services can offer comprehensive assistance, including community spaces, staffing, health and social services and training. Community partnerships can maximise funding impact. Solutions must address overall well-being and broader social determinants such as income inequality and housing.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":"37 5","pages":"1349-1360"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jhn.13340","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting the nutrition-related health and well-being of people experiencing socio-economic disadvantage: Findings from a national survey\",\"authors\":\"Verena T. Vaiciurgis, Annabel K. Clancy, Karen E. Charlton, Anita Stefoska-Needham, Eleanor J. Beck\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jhn.13340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>People experiencing socio-economic disadvantage face significantly higher rates of diet-related health inequities. This study aimed to explore barriers, opportunities and potential solutions in providing food and nutrition services to people experiencing socio-economic disadvantage from the perspective of services providers. The present study is part of a broad co-design model to improve service provision for people experiencing socio-economic disadvantage.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A cross-sectional online survey involving 33 open and closed-ended questions was distributed to Australian governmental and non-governmental organisations providing nutrition-related support to people experiencing socio-economic disadvantage aged 16 years and over. Data were analysed using frequency distributions and conceptual content analyses.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sixty-eight responses were analysed. Services are predominantly offered by charitable organisations (90%), funded through private donations (66%) and reliant on volunteers (100%). Barriers to supporting clients’ nutrition needs include financial constraints, limited community engagement, understaffing, insufficient resources and knowledge gaps. Opportunities and solutions for enhancing support include increasing government funding, advocacy initiatives, stronger community collaboration and more holistic, customised services. Proposed recommendations include establishing purpose-built facilities or wrap-around services to expand access to health services, life skills, training and educational programs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Services face challenges including volunteer reliance, limited resources and inadequate government support, hindering food provision. Client barriers include transportation costs and lack of social support. With dedicated financial support, services can offer comprehensive assistance, including community spaces, staffing, health and social services and training. Community partnerships can maximise funding impact. Solutions must address overall well-being and broader social determinants such as income inequality and housing.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics\",\"volume\":\"37 5\",\"pages\":\"1349-1360\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jhn.13340\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jhn.13340\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jhn.13340","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Supporting the nutrition-related health and well-being of people experiencing socio-economic disadvantage: Findings from a national survey
Background
People experiencing socio-economic disadvantage face significantly higher rates of diet-related health inequities. This study aimed to explore barriers, opportunities and potential solutions in providing food and nutrition services to people experiencing socio-economic disadvantage from the perspective of services providers. The present study is part of a broad co-design model to improve service provision for people experiencing socio-economic disadvantage.
Methods
A cross-sectional online survey involving 33 open and closed-ended questions was distributed to Australian governmental and non-governmental organisations providing nutrition-related support to people experiencing socio-economic disadvantage aged 16 years and over. Data were analysed using frequency distributions and conceptual content analyses.
Results
Sixty-eight responses were analysed. Services are predominantly offered by charitable organisations (90%), funded through private donations (66%) and reliant on volunteers (100%). Barriers to supporting clients’ nutrition needs include financial constraints, limited community engagement, understaffing, insufficient resources and knowledge gaps. Opportunities and solutions for enhancing support include increasing government funding, advocacy initiatives, stronger community collaboration and more holistic, customised services. Proposed recommendations include establishing purpose-built facilities or wrap-around services to expand access to health services, life skills, training and educational programs.
Conclusions
Services face challenges including volunteer reliance, limited resources and inadequate government support, hindering food provision. Client barriers include transportation costs and lack of social support. With dedicated financial support, services can offer comprehensive assistance, including community spaces, staffing, health and social services and training. Community partnerships can maximise funding impact. Solutions must address overall well-being and broader social determinants such as income inequality and housing.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing papers in applied nutrition and dietetics. Papers are therefore welcomed on:
- Clinical nutrition and the practice of therapeutic dietetics
- Clinical and professional guidelines
- Public health nutrition and nutritional epidemiology
- Dietary surveys and dietary assessment methodology
- Health promotion and intervention studies and their effectiveness
- Obesity, weight control and body composition
- Research on psychological determinants of healthy and unhealthy eating behaviour. Focus can for example be on attitudes, brain correlates of food reward processing, social influences, impulsivity, cognitive control, cognitive processes, dieting, psychological treatments.
- Appetite, Food intake and nutritional status
- Nutrigenomics and molecular nutrition
- The journal does not publish animal research
The journal is published in an online-only format. No printed issue of this title will be produced but authors will still be able to order offprints of their own articles.