贴有青霉素过敏标签的儿科住院病人的真实过敏率 (TRIAL)。

The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-07-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4212/cjhp.3531
Natasha Kwan, Kristopher Kang, Roxane R Carr, Raymond Mak, Ashley Roberts, Falla Jin, Jeffrey N Bone, S Rod Rassekh, Tiffany Wong
{"title":"贴有青霉素过敏标签的儿科住院病人的真实过敏率 (TRIAL)。","authors":"Natasha Kwan, Kristopher Kang, Roxane R Carr, Raymond Mak, Ashley Roberts, Falla Jin, Jeffrey N Bone, S Rod Rassekh, Tiffany Wong","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Penicillin allergy is a common drug allergy diagnosis in pediatric patients; however, upon appropriate allergy testing, many of these patients are found not to have a true allergy. For patients with a reported allergy, alternative antibiotics are prescribed, which are less effective, more toxic, or more expensive. There is a lack of data evaluating allergies in hospitalized children and comparing allergy assessments conducted by pediatric allergists and pharmacists.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the percentage of pediatric patients admitted with reported penicillin allergy who did not have a true penicillin allergy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre prospective cohort study included inpatients between 6 months and 17 years of age, with a documented penicillin allergy, who were admitted to the general pediatric and oncology units of a tertiary care children's hospital between November 2019 and March 2023. The allergy history, evaluation, and risk categorization were performed by pharmacists. The history was reviewed with the allergist, and the patient was then referred, underwent skin testing, or received oral amoxicillin challenge with monitoring for 1 hour.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients were included, of whom 29 (97%) had delabelling of their penicillin allergy. Four patients (13%) had delabelling on the basis of history alone, without risk assessment. Twenty-five (83%) of the patients were assessed as having low risk; 24 of these had delabelling following oral challenge, and 1 did not complete the oral challenge because of transfer to another hospital. One patient (3%) was assessed as having moderate risk, with delabelling on the basis of results of skin testing and oral challenge. The pharmacist's and allergist's risk assessments were in agreement in 29 (97%) of the 30 cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pediatric patients, including those with oncologic malignancies, are often mislabelled as having a penicillin allergy. Pharmacists are able to accurately determine true allergy risk and delabel penicillin allergies for pediatric patients in the hospital setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":"77 3","pages":"e3531"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11210598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"True Rate of Allergy among Pediatric Inpatients with Penicillin Allergy Labels (TRIAL).\",\"authors\":\"Natasha Kwan, Kristopher Kang, Roxane R Carr, Raymond Mak, Ashley Roberts, Falla Jin, Jeffrey N Bone, S Rod Rassekh, Tiffany Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.4212/cjhp.3531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Penicillin allergy is a common drug allergy diagnosis in pediatric patients; however, upon appropriate allergy testing, many of these patients are found not to have a true allergy. For patients with a reported allergy, alternative antibiotics are prescribed, which are less effective, more toxic, or more expensive. There is a lack of data evaluating allergies in hospitalized children and comparing allergy assessments conducted by pediatric allergists and pharmacists.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the percentage of pediatric patients admitted with reported penicillin allergy who did not have a true penicillin allergy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre prospective cohort study included inpatients between 6 months and 17 years of age, with a documented penicillin allergy, who were admitted to the general pediatric and oncology units of a tertiary care children's hospital between November 2019 and March 2023. The allergy history, evaluation, and risk categorization were performed by pharmacists. The history was reviewed with the allergist, and the patient was then referred, underwent skin testing, or received oral amoxicillin challenge with monitoring for 1 hour.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients were included, of whom 29 (97%) had delabelling of their penicillin allergy. Four patients (13%) had delabelling on the basis of history alone, without risk assessment. Twenty-five (83%) of the patients were assessed as having low risk; 24 of these had delabelling following oral challenge, and 1 did not complete the oral challenge because of transfer to another hospital. One patient (3%) was assessed as having moderate risk, with delabelling on the basis of results of skin testing and oral challenge. The pharmacist's and allergist's risk assessments were in agreement in 29 (97%) of the 30 cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pediatric patients, including those with oncologic malignancies, are often mislabelled as having a penicillin allergy. Pharmacists are able to accurately determine true allergy risk and delabel penicillin allergies for pediatric patients in the hospital setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"77 3\",\"pages\":\"e3531\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11210598/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3531\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:青霉素过敏是儿科患者常见的药物过敏诊断;然而,在进行适当的过敏测试后,许多患者被发现并非真正过敏。对于报告过敏的患者,医生会开具其他抗生素处方,但这些处方的疗效较差、毒性较强或价格较高。目前缺乏对住院儿童过敏情况的评估数据,也没有对儿科过敏专家和药剂师进行的过敏评估进行比较:目的:估计因青霉素过敏而入院的儿童患者中真正对青霉素过敏的比例:这项单中心前瞻性队列研究纳入了 2019 年 11 月至 2023 年 3 月期间在一家三级儿童医院普通儿科和肿瘤科住院的 6 个月至 17 岁有青霉素过敏记录的住院患者。过敏史、评估和风险分类由药剂师进行。过敏史由过敏学家审查,然后将患者转诊、进行皮肤测试或接受口服阿莫西林挑战并监测 1 小时:结果:共纳入了 30 名患者,其中 29 人(97%)对青霉素过敏。4名患者(13%)仅根据病史而未进行风险评估就进行了脱敏治疗。25 名患者(83%)被评估为低风险;其中 24 人在口服药物后进行了脱敏试验,1 人因转院而未完成口服药物试验。一名患者(3%)被评估为中度风险,根据皮试和口服试验的结果取消了标记。在 30 个病例中,有 29 个病例(97%)的药剂师和过敏症专家的风险评估结果一致:结论:包括肿瘤恶性肿瘤患者在内的儿科患者经常被误诊为青霉素过敏。药剂师能够准确判断真正的过敏风险,并为医院环境中的儿科患者去除青霉素过敏标签。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
True Rate of Allergy among Pediatric Inpatients with Penicillin Allergy Labels (TRIAL).

Background: Penicillin allergy is a common drug allergy diagnosis in pediatric patients; however, upon appropriate allergy testing, many of these patients are found not to have a true allergy. For patients with a reported allergy, alternative antibiotics are prescribed, which are less effective, more toxic, or more expensive. There is a lack of data evaluating allergies in hospitalized children and comparing allergy assessments conducted by pediatric allergists and pharmacists.

Objective: To estimate the percentage of pediatric patients admitted with reported penicillin allergy who did not have a true penicillin allergy.

Methods: This single-centre prospective cohort study included inpatients between 6 months and 17 years of age, with a documented penicillin allergy, who were admitted to the general pediatric and oncology units of a tertiary care children's hospital between November 2019 and March 2023. The allergy history, evaluation, and risk categorization were performed by pharmacists. The history was reviewed with the allergist, and the patient was then referred, underwent skin testing, or received oral amoxicillin challenge with monitoring for 1 hour.

Results: Thirty patients were included, of whom 29 (97%) had delabelling of their penicillin allergy. Four patients (13%) had delabelling on the basis of history alone, without risk assessment. Twenty-five (83%) of the patients were assessed as having low risk; 24 of these had delabelling following oral challenge, and 1 did not complete the oral challenge because of transfer to another hospital. One patient (3%) was assessed as having moderate risk, with delabelling on the basis of results of skin testing and oral challenge. The pharmacist's and allergist's risk assessments were in agreement in 29 (97%) of the 30 cases.

Conclusions: Pediatric patients, including those with oncologic malignancies, are often mislabelled as having a penicillin allergy. Pharmacists are able to accurately determine true allergy risk and delabel penicillin allergies for pediatric patients in the hospital setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to "Discharge Opioid Prescription and Consumption Following Surgery: The POPCORN Observational Study". Development of an Environmental Audit Tool for Hospital Pharmacy. Les traitements traditionnels et les compléments alimentaires chez le patient atteint de cancer: État des lieux en Tunisie. Overcoming Challenges during Breastfeeding to Prevent Perinatal HIV Transmission in Canada: A Case Series. Piloting a Hospital Pharmacy Performance Model in the Face of Province-Wide Implementation of Activity-Based Funding in Quebec Health Care Centres.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1