{"title":"通过基于模型的深度学习重建提高前列腺癌患者前列腺弥散加权成像的图像质量","authors":"Noriko Nishioka , Noriyuki Fujima , Satonori Tsuneta , Masato Yoshikawa , Rina Kimura , Keita Sakamoto , Fumi Kato , Haruka Miyata , Hiroshi Kikuchi , Ryuji Matsumoto , Takashige Abe , Jihun Kwon , Masami Yoneyama , Kohsuke Kudo","doi":"10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the utility of model-based deep learning reconstruction in prostate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study evaluated two prostate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) methods: deep learning reconstruction (DL-DWI) and traditional parallel imaging (PI-DWI). We examined 32 patients with radiologically diagnosed and histologically confirmed prostate cancer (PCa) lesions ≥10 mm. Image quality was evaluated both qualitatively (for overall quality, prostate conspicuity, and lesion conspicuity) and quantitatively, using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for prostate tissue.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the qualitative evaluation, DL-DWI scored significantly higher than PI-DWI for all three parameters (p<0.0001). In the quantitative analysis, DL-DWI showed significantly higher SNR and CNR values compared to PI-DWI (p<0.0001). Both the prostate tissue and the lesions exhibited significantly higher ADC values in DL-DWI compared to PI-DWI (p<0.0001, p=0.0014, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Model-based DL reconstruction enhanced both qualitative and quantitative aspects of image quality in prostate DWI. However, this study did not include comparisons with other DL-based methods, which is a limitation that warrants future research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38076,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000431/pdfft?md5=b9b782fb0ca622347ec25b1eacf0e51d&pid=1-s2.0-S2352047724000431-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing the image quality of prostate diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with prostate cancer through model-based deep learning reconstruction\",\"authors\":\"Noriko Nishioka , Noriyuki Fujima , Satonori Tsuneta , Masato Yoshikawa , Rina Kimura , Keita Sakamoto , Fumi Kato , Haruka Miyata , Hiroshi Kikuchi , Ryuji Matsumoto , Takashige Abe , Jihun Kwon , Masami Yoneyama , Kohsuke Kudo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the utility of model-based deep learning reconstruction in prostate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study evaluated two prostate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) methods: deep learning reconstruction (DL-DWI) and traditional parallel imaging (PI-DWI). We examined 32 patients with radiologically diagnosed and histologically confirmed prostate cancer (PCa) lesions ≥10 mm. Image quality was evaluated both qualitatively (for overall quality, prostate conspicuity, and lesion conspicuity) and quantitatively, using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for prostate tissue.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the qualitative evaluation, DL-DWI scored significantly higher than PI-DWI for all three parameters (p<0.0001). In the quantitative analysis, DL-DWI showed significantly higher SNR and CNR values compared to PI-DWI (p<0.0001). Both the prostate tissue and the lesions exhibited significantly higher ADC values in DL-DWI compared to PI-DWI (p<0.0001, p=0.0014, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Model-based DL reconstruction enhanced both qualitative and quantitative aspects of image quality in prostate DWI. However, this study did not include comparisons with other DL-based methods, which is a limitation that warrants future research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000431/pdfft?md5=b9b782fb0ca622347ec25b1eacf0e51d&pid=1-s2.0-S2352047724000431-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enhancing the image quality of prostate diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with prostate cancer through model-based deep learning reconstruction
Purpose
To evaluate the utility of model-based deep learning reconstruction in prostate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).
Methods
This retrospective study evaluated two prostate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) methods: deep learning reconstruction (DL-DWI) and traditional parallel imaging (PI-DWI). We examined 32 patients with radiologically diagnosed and histologically confirmed prostate cancer (PCa) lesions ≥10 mm. Image quality was evaluated both qualitatively (for overall quality, prostate conspicuity, and lesion conspicuity) and quantitatively, using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for prostate tissue.
Results
In the qualitative evaluation, DL-DWI scored significantly higher than PI-DWI for all three parameters (p<0.0001). In the quantitative analysis, DL-DWI showed significantly higher SNR and CNR values compared to PI-DWI (p<0.0001). Both the prostate tissue and the lesions exhibited significantly higher ADC values in DL-DWI compared to PI-DWI (p<0.0001, p=0.0014, respectively).
Conclusion
Model-based DL reconstruction enhanced both qualitative and quantitative aspects of image quality in prostate DWI. However, this study did not include comparisons with other DL-based methods, which is a limitation that warrants future research.