岩溶石灰岩和白云岩栖息地的叶片性状网络中,岩石暴露和土壤深度的优势大于土壤质量的优势

IF 3.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forest Ecosystems Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100220
Min Jiao, Jiawei Yan, Ying Zhao, Tingting Xia, Kaiping Shen, Yuejun He
{"title":"岩溶石灰岩和白云岩栖息地的叶片性状网络中,岩石暴露和土壤深度的优势大于土壤质量的优势","authors":"Min Jiao,&nbsp;Jiawei Yan,&nbsp;Ying Zhao,&nbsp;Tingting Xia,&nbsp;Kaiping Shen,&nbsp;Yuejun He","doi":"10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Leaf trait networks (LTNs) visualize the intricate linkages reflecting plant trait-functional coordination. Typical karst vegetation, developed from lithological dolomite and limestone, generally exhibits differential communities, possibly due to habitat rock exposure, soil depth, and soil physicochemical properties variations, leading to a shift from plant trait variation to functional linkages. However, how soil and habitat quality affect the differentiation of leaf trait networks remains unclear. LTNs were constructed for typical dolomite and limestone habitats by analyzing twenty-one woody plant leaf traits across fifty-six forest subplots in karst mountains. The differences between dolomite and limestone LTNs were compared using network parameters. The network association of soil and habitat quality was analyzed using redundancy analysis (RDA), Mantle's test, and a random forest model. The limestone LTN exhibited significantly higher edge density with lower diameter and average path length when compared to the dolomite LTN. It indicates LTN differentiation, with the limestone network displaying a more compact architecture and higher connectivity than the dolomite network. The specific leaf phosphorus and leaf nitrogen contents of dolomite LTN, as well as the leaf mass and leaf carbon contents of limestone LTN, significantly contributed to network degree and closeness, serving as crucial node traits regulating LTN connectedness. Additionally, both habitat LTNs significantly correlated with soil nitrogen and phosphorus, stoichiometric ratios, pH, and organic carbon, as well as soil depth and rock exposure rates, with soil depth and rock exposure showing greater relative importance. Soil depth and rock exposure dominate trait network differentiation, with the limestone habitat exhibiting a more compact network architecture than the dolomite habitat.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54270,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecosystems","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100220"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2197562024000563/pdfft?md5=e560e171e1ac18d0eddd53f67cca4059&pid=1-s2.0-S2197562024000563-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dominance of rock exposure and soil depth in leaf trait networks outweighs soil quality in karst limestone and dolomite habitats\",\"authors\":\"Min Jiao,&nbsp;Jiawei Yan,&nbsp;Ying Zhao,&nbsp;Tingting Xia,&nbsp;Kaiping Shen,&nbsp;Yuejun He\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Leaf trait networks (LTNs) visualize the intricate linkages reflecting plant trait-functional coordination. Typical karst vegetation, developed from lithological dolomite and limestone, generally exhibits differential communities, possibly due to habitat rock exposure, soil depth, and soil physicochemical properties variations, leading to a shift from plant trait variation to functional linkages. However, how soil and habitat quality affect the differentiation of leaf trait networks remains unclear. LTNs were constructed for typical dolomite and limestone habitats by analyzing twenty-one woody plant leaf traits across fifty-six forest subplots in karst mountains. The differences between dolomite and limestone LTNs were compared using network parameters. The network association of soil and habitat quality was analyzed using redundancy analysis (RDA), Mantle's test, and a random forest model. The limestone LTN exhibited significantly higher edge density with lower diameter and average path length when compared to the dolomite LTN. It indicates LTN differentiation, with the limestone network displaying a more compact architecture and higher connectivity than the dolomite network. The specific leaf phosphorus and leaf nitrogen contents of dolomite LTN, as well as the leaf mass and leaf carbon contents of limestone LTN, significantly contributed to network degree and closeness, serving as crucial node traits regulating LTN connectedness. Additionally, both habitat LTNs significantly correlated with soil nitrogen and phosphorus, stoichiometric ratios, pH, and organic carbon, as well as soil depth and rock exposure rates, with soil depth and rock exposure showing greater relative importance. Soil depth and rock exposure dominate trait network differentiation, with the limestone habitat exhibiting a more compact network architecture than the dolomite habitat.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Ecosystems\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2197562024000563/pdfft?md5=e560e171e1ac18d0eddd53f67cca4059&pid=1-s2.0-S2197562024000563-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Ecosystems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2197562024000563\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2197562024000563","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

叶片性状网络(LTN)将反映植物性状与功能协调的复杂联系形象化。典型的岩溶植被发育自岩性白云岩和石灰岩,通常表现出不同的群落,这可能是由于栖息地岩石裸露、土壤深度和土壤理化性质的变化,导致植物性状变异向功能联系转变。然而,土壤和生境质量如何影响叶片性状网络的分化仍不清楚。通过分析喀斯特山区 56 个森林小区的 21 种木本植物叶片性状,构建了典型白云岩和石灰岩生境的叶片性状网络。利用网络参数比较了白云岩和石灰岩 LTN 的差异。使用冗余分析(RDA)、曼特尔检验和随机森林模型分析了土壤和生境质量的网络关联。与白云石LTN相比,石灰岩LTN的边缘密度明显较高,直径和平均路径长度较低。这表明 LTN 存在分化,石灰岩网络比白云岩网络结构更紧凑,连通性更高。白云石LTN的特定叶磷和叶氮含量,以及石灰岩LTN的叶片质量和叶碳含量对网络度和紧密度有显著影响,是调节LTN连通性的关键节点特征。此外,两种生境的LTN都与土壤氮磷、化学计量比、pH值、有机碳以及土壤深度和岩石裸露率显著相关,其中土壤深度和岩石裸露率的相对重要性更大。土壤深度和岩石暴露率在性状网络分化中占主导地位,石灰岩栖息地的网络结构比白云岩栖息地更为紧凑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dominance of rock exposure and soil depth in leaf trait networks outweighs soil quality in karst limestone and dolomite habitats

Leaf trait networks (LTNs) visualize the intricate linkages reflecting plant trait-functional coordination. Typical karst vegetation, developed from lithological dolomite and limestone, generally exhibits differential communities, possibly due to habitat rock exposure, soil depth, and soil physicochemical properties variations, leading to a shift from plant trait variation to functional linkages. However, how soil and habitat quality affect the differentiation of leaf trait networks remains unclear. LTNs were constructed for typical dolomite and limestone habitats by analyzing twenty-one woody plant leaf traits across fifty-six forest subplots in karst mountains. The differences between dolomite and limestone LTNs were compared using network parameters. The network association of soil and habitat quality was analyzed using redundancy analysis (RDA), Mantle's test, and a random forest model. The limestone LTN exhibited significantly higher edge density with lower diameter and average path length when compared to the dolomite LTN. It indicates LTN differentiation, with the limestone network displaying a more compact architecture and higher connectivity than the dolomite network. The specific leaf phosphorus and leaf nitrogen contents of dolomite LTN, as well as the leaf mass and leaf carbon contents of limestone LTN, significantly contributed to network degree and closeness, serving as crucial node traits regulating LTN connectedness. Additionally, both habitat LTNs significantly correlated with soil nitrogen and phosphorus, stoichiometric ratios, pH, and organic carbon, as well as soil depth and rock exposure rates, with soil depth and rock exposure showing greater relative importance. Soil depth and rock exposure dominate trait network differentiation, with the limestone habitat exhibiting a more compact network architecture than the dolomite habitat.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecosystems
Forest Ecosystems Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
1115
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecosystems is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing scientific communications from any discipline that can provide interesting contributions about the structure and dynamics of "natural" and "domesticated" forest ecosystems, and their services to people. The journal welcomes innovative science as well as application oriented work that will enhance understanding of woody plant communities. Very specific studies are welcome if they are part of a thematic series that provides some holistic perspective that is of general interest.
期刊最新文献
Relationships between charcoal property and post fire productivity in the boreal forest Evaluating tree branch angle measurements of European beech using terrestrial laser scanning Assessment of the heartwood contribution to carbon accumulation in Pinus sylvestris L. trees under different forest site conditions Drivers and patterns of community completeness suggest that Tuscan Fagus sylvatica forests can naturally have a low plant diversity Sensitivity of gross primary production and evapotranspiration to heat and drought stress in a young temperate plantation in northern China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1