蒸汽朗肯循环的技术经济和碳足迹分析

IF 1.4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1002/apj.3118
Shu Yao Wong, Yick Eu Chew, Viknesh Andiappan, Shyam Lakshmanan, Dominic C. Y. Foo
{"title":"蒸汽朗肯循环的技术经济和碳足迹分析","authors":"Shu Yao Wong,&nbsp;Yick Eu Chew,&nbsp;Viknesh Andiappan,&nbsp;Shyam Lakshmanan,&nbsp;Dominic C. Y. Foo","doi":"10.1002/apj.3118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Steam Rankine cycle (SRC), which is mainly utilised in power generation sector, faces external irreversibility in its daily operation causing inefficiency in the system. To address this issue, reheat Rankine cycle (RHRC) and regenerative Rankine cycle (RRC) have been widely studied and implemented in power plants to improve thermal efficiency and reduce external irreversibility of Rankine cycle. This study investigates the implementation of different RRC configurations in a combined heat and power plant, including RRC with modified thermal deaerator, RRC with open feed water heater (OFWH) and closed feed water heater (CFWH). A base case simulation model was first constructed using commercial simulation software Aspen HYSYS for the basic SRC system based on actual plant data. Various scenarios were then evaluated for their profitability and sustainability through techno-economic analysis (TEA) and carbon footprint analysis (CFA). From both analyses, the scenario of RRC with CFWH showed the greatest long-term potential, generating the highest annual profit of $ 771 691 and carbon footprint reduction of 14.63%, while RRC with modified thermal deaerator showed the greatest potential in the short run with the highest return of investment (ROI) of 201.51% and shortest payback period (PBP) of 0.50 year.</p>","PeriodicalId":49237,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering","volume":"19 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techno-economic and carbon footprint analyses of steam Rankine cycle\",\"authors\":\"Shu Yao Wong,&nbsp;Yick Eu Chew,&nbsp;Viknesh Andiappan,&nbsp;Shyam Lakshmanan,&nbsp;Dominic C. Y. Foo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/apj.3118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Steam Rankine cycle (SRC), which is mainly utilised in power generation sector, faces external irreversibility in its daily operation causing inefficiency in the system. To address this issue, reheat Rankine cycle (RHRC) and regenerative Rankine cycle (RRC) have been widely studied and implemented in power plants to improve thermal efficiency and reduce external irreversibility of Rankine cycle. This study investigates the implementation of different RRC configurations in a combined heat and power plant, including RRC with modified thermal deaerator, RRC with open feed water heater (OFWH) and closed feed water heater (CFWH). A base case simulation model was first constructed using commercial simulation software Aspen HYSYS for the basic SRC system based on actual plant data. Various scenarios were then evaluated for their profitability and sustainability through techno-economic analysis (TEA) and carbon footprint analysis (CFA). From both analyses, the scenario of RRC with CFWH showed the greatest long-term potential, generating the highest annual profit of $ 771 691 and carbon footprint reduction of 14.63%, while RRC with modified thermal deaerator showed the greatest potential in the short run with the highest return of investment (ROI) of 201.51% and shortest payback period (PBP) of 0.50 year.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"19 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/apj.3118\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/apj.3118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主要用于发电行业的蒸汽朗肯循环(SRC)在日常运行中面临着外部不可逆问题,导致系统效率低下。为解决这一问题,发电厂广泛研究并实施了再热朗肯循环(RHRC)和再生朗肯循环(RRC),以提高热效率并降低朗肯循环的外部不可逆性。本研究调查了热电联产电厂中不同朗肯循环配置的实施情况,包括带改进型热力除氧器的朗肯循环、带开放式给水加热器(OFWH)的朗肯循环和带封闭式给水加热器(CFWH)的朗肯循环。首先使用商业仿真软件 Aspen HYSYS,根据电厂的实际数据为基本的 SRC 系统建立了一个基本情况仿真模型。然后,通过技术经济分析(TEA)和碳足迹分析(CFA)对各种方案的盈利能力和可持续性进行了评估。通过这两项分析,带有 CFWH 的 RRC 方案显示出最大的长期潜力,可产生最高的年利润 771 691 美元和减少 14.63% 的碳足迹,而带有改良热脱气机的 RRC 则显示出最大的短期潜力,投资回报率 (ROI) 最高,为 201.51%,投资回收期 (PBP) 最短,为 0.50 年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Techno-economic and carbon footprint analyses of steam Rankine cycle

Steam Rankine cycle (SRC), which is mainly utilised in power generation sector, faces external irreversibility in its daily operation causing inefficiency in the system. To address this issue, reheat Rankine cycle (RHRC) and regenerative Rankine cycle (RRC) have been widely studied and implemented in power plants to improve thermal efficiency and reduce external irreversibility of Rankine cycle. This study investigates the implementation of different RRC configurations in a combined heat and power plant, including RRC with modified thermal deaerator, RRC with open feed water heater (OFWH) and closed feed water heater (CFWH). A base case simulation model was first constructed using commercial simulation software Aspen HYSYS for the basic SRC system based on actual plant data. Various scenarios were then evaluated for their profitability and sustainability through techno-economic analysis (TEA) and carbon footprint analysis (CFA). From both analyses, the scenario of RRC with CFWH showed the greatest long-term potential, generating the highest annual profit of $ 771 691 and carbon footprint reduction of 14.63%, while RRC with modified thermal deaerator showed the greatest potential in the short run with the highest return of investment (ROI) of 201.51% and shortest payback period (PBP) of 0.50 year.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering is aimed at capturing current developments and initiatives in chemical engineering related and specialised areas. Publishing six issues each year, the journal showcases innovative technological developments, providing an opportunity for technology transfer and collaboration. Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering will focus particular attention on the key areas of: Process Application (separation, polymer, catalysis, nanotechnology, electrochemistry, nuclear technology); Energy and Environmental Technology (materials for energy storage and conversion, coal gasification, gas liquefaction, air pollution control, water treatment, waste utilization and management, nuclear waste remediation); and Biochemical Engineering (including targeted drug delivery applications).
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Construction of ternary heterostructure of zeolite/Fe3O4/CuS/CuWO4 as a reusable: Characterization studies Optimizing of heat transfer and flow characteristics within a roughened solar air heater duct with compound turbulators Numerical simulation on the pressure, turbulence, and λ 2 vortex characteristics within the annular symmetric jet process under different vacuum degrees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1