评估表面发射率测量不确定性的蒙特卡罗方法

IF 3.6 1区 物理与天体物理 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Nuclear Science and Techniques Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1007/s41365-024-01474-6
Yuan-Qiao Li, Min Lin, Li-Jun Xu, Rui Luo, Yu-He Zhang, Qian-Xi Ni, Yun-Tao Liu
{"title":"评估表面发射率测量不确定性的蒙特卡罗方法","authors":"Yuan-Qiao Li, Min Lin, Li-Jun Xu, Rui Luo, Yu-He Zhang, Qian-Xi Ni, Yun-Tao Liu","doi":"10.1007/s41365-024-01474-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this study is to evaluate the uncertainty of <span>\\(2\\pi \\alpha \\)</span> and <span>\\(2\\pi \\beta \\)</span> surface emission rates using the windowless multiwire proportional counter method. This study used the Monte Carlo method (MCM) to validate the conventional Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) method. A dead time measurement model for the two-source method was established based on the characteristics of a single-channel measurement system, and the voltage threshold correction factor measurement function was indirectly obtained by fitting the threshold correction curve. The uncertainty in the surface emission rate was calculated using the GUM method and the law of propagation of uncertainty. The MCM provided clear definitions for each input quantity and its uncertainty distribution, and the simulation training was realized with a complete and complex mathematical model. The results of the surface emission rate uncertainty evaluation for four radioactive plane sources using both methods showed the uncertainty’s consistency <span>\\(E_\\text {n} &lt; 0.070\\)</span> for the comparison of each source, and the uncertainty results of the GUM were all lower than those of the MCM. However, the MCM has a more objective evaluation process and can serve as a validation tool for GUM results.</p>","PeriodicalId":19177,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Science and Techniques","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monte Carlo method for evaluation of surface emission rate measurement uncertainty\",\"authors\":\"Yuan-Qiao Li, Min Lin, Li-Jun Xu, Rui Luo, Yu-He Zhang, Qian-Xi Ni, Yun-Tao Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41365-024-01474-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The aim of this study is to evaluate the uncertainty of <span>\\\\(2\\\\pi \\\\alpha \\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(2\\\\pi \\\\beta \\\\)</span> surface emission rates using the windowless multiwire proportional counter method. This study used the Monte Carlo method (MCM) to validate the conventional Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) method. A dead time measurement model for the two-source method was established based on the characteristics of a single-channel measurement system, and the voltage threshold correction factor measurement function was indirectly obtained by fitting the threshold correction curve. The uncertainty in the surface emission rate was calculated using the GUM method and the law of propagation of uncertainty. The MCM provided clear definitions for each input quantity and its uncertainty distribution, and the simulation training was realized with a complete and complex mathematical model. The results of the surface emission rate uncertainty evaluation for four radioactive plane sources using both methods showed the uncertainty’s consistency <span>\\\\(E_\\\\text {n} &lt; 0.070\\\\)</span> for the comparison of each source, and the uncertainty results of the GUM were all lower than those of the MCM. However, the MCM has a more objective evaluation process and can serve as a validation tool for GUM results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Science and Techniques\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Science and Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01474-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Science and Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01474-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是使用无窗多线比例计数器方法评估\(2\pi \alpha\)和\(2\pi \beta\)表面发射率的不确定性。这项研究使用蒙特卡罗方法(MCM)验证了传统的测量不确定性表达指南(GUM)方法。根据单通道测量系统的特性建立了双源法的死区时间测量模型,并通过拟合阈值修正曲线间接获得了电压阈值修正因子测量函数。利用 GUM 法和不确定度传播定律计算了表面发射率的不确定度。MCM 为每个输入量及其不确定度分布提供了明确的定义,并通过完整而复杂的数学模型实现了仿真训练。采用两种方法对 4 个平面放射源的面发射率不确定度评价结果表明,各放射源的不确定度比较一致(E_\text {n} <0.070\),GUM 的不确定度结果均低于 MCM 的不确定度结果。不过,MCM 的评价过程更加客观,可以作为 GUM 结果的验证工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Monte Carlo method for evaluation of surface emission rate measurement uncertainty

The aim of this study is to evaluate the uncertainty of \(2\pi \alpha \) and \(2\pi \beta \) surface emission rates using the windowless multiwire proportional counter method. This study used the Monte Carlo method (MCM) to validate the conventional Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) method. A dead time measurement model for the two-source method was established based on the characteristics of a single-channel measurement system, and the voltage threshold correction factor measurement function was indirectly obtained by fitting the threshold correction curve. The uncertainty in the surface emission rate was calculated using the GUM method and the law of propagation of uncertainty. The MCM provided clear definitions for each input quantity and its uncertainty distribution, and the simulation training was realized with a complete and complex mathematical model. The results of the surface emission rate uncertainty evaluation for four radioactive plane sources using both methods showed the uncertainty’s consistency \(E_\text {n} < 0.070\) for the comparison of each source, and the uncertainty results of the GUM were all lower than those of the MCM. However, the MCM has a more objective evaluation process and can serve as a validation tool for GUM results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nuclear Science and Techniques
Nuclear Science and Techniques 物理-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
39.30%
发文量
141
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Nuclear Science and Techniques (NST) reports scientific findings, technical advances and important results in the fields of nuclear science and techniques. The aim of this periodical is to stimulate cross-fertilization of knowledge among scientists and engineers working in the fields of nuclear research. Scope covers the following subjects: • Synchrotron radiation applications, beamline technology; • Accelerator, ray technology and applications; • Nuclear chemistry, radiochemistry, radiopharmaceuticals, nuclear medicine; • Nuclear electronics and instrumentation; • Nuclear physics and interdisciplinary research; • Nuclear energy science and engineering.
期刊最新文献
Properties of the phase diagram from the Nambu-Jona-Lasino model with a scalar-vector interaction In-beam gamma rays of CSNS Back-n characterized by black resonance filter Analysis of level structure and monopole effects in Ca isotopes Highly coupled off-resonance lattice design in diffraction-limited light sources Possibility of reaching the predicted center of the “island of stability” via the radioactive beam-induced fusion reactions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1