轻度脑外伤的长期认知和情感后果:与老年人的比较。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Brain injury Pub Date : 2024-11-09 Epub Date: 2024-07-12 DOI:10.1080/02699052.2024.2376769
Adam William Cox, Myra A Fernandes
{"title":"轻度脑外伤的长期认知和情感后果:与老年人的比较。","authors":"Adam William Cox, Myra A Fernandes","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2376769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Memory and affective processing were compared in young adults with a remote mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), to healthy younger and older adults. We evaluated memory performance when encoding was done under multi-tasking (divided attention) conditions, likely to exacerbate cognitive and psychological symptoms in mTBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants studied pairs of unrelated words under either full or divided attention conditions. Memory for single words (item memory) and for pairs of words (associative memory) was then assessed in sequential independent recognition tests, under full attention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Associative memory was poorer than item memory, and worse when encoding was done under divided than full attention. The decline in recognition accuracy from full to divided attention conditions on the associative memory test was significantly greater in mTBI compared to young adults and was similar in magnitude to that observed in older adults under full attention. Self-reported mental and total fatigue increased significantly as performance on the memory tests, following the divided attention condition, decreased, but only in the mTBI group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results show lingering memory deficits, and suggest that cognitive tasks may be experienced as psychologically more demanding in those with a mTBI, even months or years after injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"1133-1146"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term cognitive and affective consequences of mild traumatic brain injury: comparison with older adults.\",\"authors\":\"Adam William Cox, Myra A Fernandes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02699052.2024.2376769\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Memory and affective processing were compared in young adults with a remote mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), to healthy younger and older adults. We evaluated memory performance when encoding was done under multi-tasking (divided attention) conditions, likely to exacerbate cognitive and psychological symptoms in mTBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants studied pairs of unrelated words under either full or divided attention conditions. Memory for single words (item memory) and for pairs of words (associative memory) was then assessed in sequential independent recognition tests, under full attention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Associative memory was poorer than item memory, and worse when encoding was done under divided than full attention. The decline in recognition accuracy from full to divided attention conditions on the associative memory test was significantly greater in mTBI compared to young adults and was similar in magnitude to that observed in older adults under full attention. Self-reported mental and total fatigue increased significantly as performance on the memory tests, following the divided attention condition, decreased, but only in the mTBI group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results show lingering memory deficits, and suggest that cognitive tasks may be experienced as psychologically more demanding in those with a mTBI, even months or years after injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain injury\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1133-1146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain injury\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2376769\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain injury","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2376769","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们将患有远处轻度脑损伤(mTBI)的年轻人与健康的年轻人和老年人进行了记忆和情感处理方面的比较。我们评估了在多任务(注意力分散)条件下进行编码时的记忆表现,多任务可能会加重轻微脑损伤患者的认知和心理症状:方法:受试者在全神贯注或分散注意的条件下学习一对不相关的单词。然后在全神贯注的情况下,通过连续的独立识别测试来评估对单个单词的记忆(项目记忆)和对成对单词的记忆(联想记忆):结果:联想记忆比单项记忆差,在注意力分散的情况下进行编码时,联想记忆比全神贯注时差。在联想记忆测试中,从全神贯注到分散注意力条件下,肌肉萎缩性脑损伤患者的识别准确率的下降幅度明显高于年轻人,而且与老年人在全神贯注条件下的下降幅度相似。在注意力分散条件下,随着记忆测试成绩的下降,自我报告的精神和总体疲劳程度明显增加,但这只发生在 mTBI 组:结论:研究结果表明,记忆缺陷仍然存在,这表明,即使在受伤数月或数年后,创伤后脑损伤患者也可能会感觉认知任务对其心理要求更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-term cognitive and affective consequences of mild traumatic brain injury: comparison with older adults.

Objective: Memory and affective processing were compared in young adults with a remote mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), to healthy younger and older adults. We evaluated memory performance when encoding was done under multi-tasking (divided attention) conditions, likely to exacerbate cognitive and psychological symptoms in mTBI.

Methods: Participants studied pairs of unrelated words under either full or divided attention conditions. Memory for single words (item memory) and for pairs of words (associative memory) was then assessed in sequential independent recognition tests, under full attention.

Results: Associative memory was poorer than item memory, and worse when encoding was done under divided than full attention. The decline in recognition accuracy from full to divided attention conditions on the associative memory test was significantly greater in mTBI compared to young adults and was similar in magnitude to that observed in older adults under full attention. Self-reported mental and total fatigue increased significantly as performance on the memory tests, following the divided attention condition, decreased, but only in the mTBI group.

Conclusions: Results show lingering memory deficits, and suggest that cognitive tasks may be experienced as psychologically more demanding in those with a mTBI, even months or years after injury.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain injury
Brain injury 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
148
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Brain Injury publishes critical information relating to research and clinical practice, adult and pediatric populations. The journal covers a full range of relevant topics relating to clinical, translational, and basic science research. Manuscripts address emergency and acute medical care, acute and post-acute rehabilitation, family and vocational issues, and long-term supports. Coverage includes assessment and interventions for functional, communication, neurological and psychological disorders.
期刊最新文献
Functional network disruptions in youth with concussion using the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study. Treatment of intractable paradoxical herniation by invasive mechanical ventilation with increased positive end-expiratory pressure: a case report. Assessment of arousal recovery after cardiac arrest using diffusion kurtosis MRI with higher b-values: a pilot study. Redefining adjustment after acquired brain injury. Antiseizure medication possibly potentiates ictal bradycardia: a word of caution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1