Mesut Türk, Furkan Tontu, Sinan Aşar, Nalan Saygı Emir, Gülsüm Oya Hergünsel
{"title":"如何预防术中机械通气时呼吸机诱发的肺损伤?一项随机前瞻性研究。","authors":"Mesut Türk, Furkan Tontu, Sinan Aşar, Nalan Saygı Emir, Gülsüm Oya Hergünsel","doi":"10.4274/TJAR.2024.241426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intraoperative mechanical ventilation practices can lead to ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and postoperative pulmonary complications in healthy lungs. Mechanical power (MP) has been developed as a new concept in reducing the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications as it considers all respiratory mechanics that cause VILI. The most commonly used intraoperative modes are volume control ventilation (VCV) and pressure control ventilation (PCV). In this study, VCV and PCV modes were compared in terms of respiratory mechanics in patients operated in the supine and prone positions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patients were divided into 4 groups (80 patients), volume control supine and prone, pressure control supine and prone with 20 patients each. MP, respiratory rate, positive end-expiratory pressure, tidal volume, peak pressure, plato pressure, driving pressure, inspiratory time, height, age, gender, body mass index, and predictive body weight data of the patients included in the groups have been obtained from \"electronic data pool\" with Structured Query Language queries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The supine and prone MP values of the VCV group were statistically significantly lower than the PCV group (<i>P</i> values were 0.010 and 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Supine and prone MP values of the VCV group were calculated significantly lower than the PCV group. Intraoperative PCV may be considered disadvantageous regarding the risk of VILI in the supine and prone positions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23353,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","volume":"52 3","pages":"107-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to Prevent Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury in Intraoperative Mechanical Ventilation? A Randomized Prospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Mesut Türk, Furkan Tontu, Sinan Aşar, Nalan Saygı Emir, Gülsüm Oya Hergünsel\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/TJAR.2024.241426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intraoperative mechanical ventilation practices can lead to ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and postoperative pulmonary complications in healthy lungs. Mechanical power (MP) has been developed as a new concept in reducing the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications as it considers all respiratory mechanics that cause VILI. The most commonly used intraoperative modes are volume control ventilation (VCV) and pressure control ventilation (PCV). In this study, VCV and PCV modes were compared in terms of respiratory mechanics in patients operated in the supine and prone positions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patients were divided into 4 groups (80 patients), volume control supine and prone, pressure control supine and prone with 20 patients each. MP, respiratory rate, positive end-expiratory pressure, tidal volume, peak pressure, plato pressure, driving pressure, inspiratory time, height, age, gender, body mass index, and predictive body weight data of the patients included in the groups have been obtained from \\\"electronic data pool\\\" with Structured Query Language queries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The supine and prone MP values of the VCV group were statistically significantly lower than the PCV group (<i>P</i> values were 0.010 and 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Supine and prone MP values of the VCV group were calculated significantly lower than the PCV group. Intraoperative PCV may be considered disadvantageous regarding the risk of VILI in the supine and prone positions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation\",\"volume\":\"52 3\",\"pages\":\"107-112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2024.241426\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2024.241426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
How to Prevent Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury in Intraoperative Mechanical Ventilation? A Randomized Prospective Study.
Objective: Intraoperative mechanical ventilation practices can lead to ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and postoperative pulmonary complications in healthy lungs. Mechanical power (MP) has been developed as a new concept in reducing the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications as it considers all respiratory mechanics that cause VILI. The most commonly used intraoperative modes are volume control ventilation (VCV) and pressure control ventilation (PCV). In this study, VCV and PCV modes were compared in terms of respiratory mechanics in patients operated in the supine and prone positions.
Methods: The patients were divided into 4 groups (80 patients), volume control supine and prone, pressure control supine and prone with 20 patients each. MP, respiratory rate, positive end-expiratory pressure, tidal volume, peak pressure, plato pressure, driving pressure, inspiratory time, height, age, gender, body mass index, and predictive body weight data of the patients included in the groups have been obtained from "electronic data pool" with Structured Query Language queries.
Results: The supine and prone MP values of the VCV group were statistically significantly lower than the PCV group (P values were 0.010 and 0.001, respectively).
Conclusion: Supine and prone MP values of the VCV group were calculated significantly lower than the PCV group. Intraoperative PCV may be considered disadvantageous regarding the risk of VILI in the supine and prone positions.