败血症研究:异质性是基础而非事后考虑。

IF 11.1 Q1 CELL BIOLOGY Cell genomics Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100608
Timothy H Ciesielski
{"title":"败血症研究:异质性是基础而非事后考虑。","authors":"Timothy H Ciesielski","doi":"10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our understanding of sepsis has been hampered by the implicit assumption that sepsis is a homogeneous disease. In this issue of Cell Genomics, Burnham et al.<sup>1</sup> have started to characterize the genetic variants and regulatory networks that underlie variations in the individual response to sepsis; this may eventually enable targeted intervention development.</p>","PeriodicalId":72539,"journal":{"name":"Cell genomics","volume":"4 7","pages":"100608"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11293572/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sepsis research: Heterogeneity as a foundation rather than an afterthought.\",\"authors\":\"Timothy H Ciesielski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Our understanding of sepsis has been hampered by the implicit assumption that sepsis is a homogeneous disease. In this issue of Cell Genomics, Burnham et al.<sup>1</sup> have started to characterize the genetic variants and regulatory networks that underlie variations in the individual response to sepsis; this may eventually enable targeted intervention development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cell genomics\",\"volume\":\"4 7\",\"pages\":\"100608\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11293572/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cell genomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100608\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell genomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脓毒症是一种同质性疾病,这一隐含假设阻碍了我们对脓毒症的了解。在本期的《细胞基因组学》(Cell Genomics)杂志上,Burnham 等人1 已开始描述脓毒症个体反应变异的基因变异和调控网络的特征;这可能最终有助于开发有针对性的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sepsis research: Heterogeneity as a foundation rather than an afterthought.

Our understanding of sepsis has been hampered by the implicit assumption that sepsis is a homogeneous disease. In this issue of Cell Genomics, Burnham et al.1 have started to characterize the genetic variants and regulatory networks that underlie variations in the individual response to sepsis; this may eventually enable targeted intervention development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A combined deep learning framework for mammalian m6A site prediction. Analysis of single-cell CRISPR perturbations indicates that enhancers predominantly act multiplicatively. Complex structural variation is prevalent and highly pathogenic in pediatric solid tumors. Gene regulatory network inference from CRISPR perturbations in primary CD4+ T cells elucidates the genomic basis of immune disease. Leveraging genomes to support conservation and bioeconomy policies in a megadiverse country.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1