2019 年冠状病毒疾病对急性冠状动脉综合征的影响:流行病浪潮之间的差异

IF 1.3 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100422
Vincenzo Sucato, Giusy Sausa, Grazia Gambino, Alessandro D'Agostino, Salvatore Evola, Giuseppina Novo, Egle Corrado, Alfredo Ruggero Galassi
{"title":"2019 年冠状病毒疾病对急性冠状动脉综合征的影响:流行病浪潮之间的差异","authors":"Vincenzo Sucato,&nbsp;Giusy Sausa,&nbsp;Grazia Gambino,&nbsp;Alessandro D'Agostino,&nbsp;Salvatore Evola,&nbsp;Giuseppina Novo,&nbsp;Egle Corrado,&nbsp;Alfredo Ruggero Galassi","doi":"10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Since the beginning of the COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, poor attention has been paid to the indirect effects of the pandemia on cardiovascular health system, in particular in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The aims of this study is to compare possible epidemiological, clinical and management differences between the four epidemic waves in groups of patients hospitalized for ACS with a view to highlighting the burden of the pandemic on the management of this syndrome.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>In this retrospective observational study we included 98 patients admitted to Coronary Intensive Care Unit (CICU) for ACS between March 2020 and March 2022, who underwent revascularization procedure using percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI). The patients examined were divided into four groups representative of the four epidemic waves that affected our country.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The rate of hospitalization for ACS increased progressively to a 178 % increase in the third wave compared to the first (<em>p</em> = 0.003), with an increase of 900 % if we consider only Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) (representing 54 % of the ACS diagnoses of the third group against 14.3 % in the first). Longer door-to-balloon times were recorded in the third wave for the increased presence of NSTEMI. The average hospital stay was lower in the third wave with 5 ± 2 days (<em>p</em> = 0.007) as well as mortality (5.1 % in the third wave; the highest in the fourth wave with 9.5 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study show that the management of ACS suffered most from the indirect effects of the pandemic during the first wave, both because of the unpreparedness of hospital facilities and because of the fear of infection that has dissuaded people from asking for help.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72158,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100422"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266660222400065X/pdfft?md5=dbca308cd584ec34fe47bfca389253da&pid=1-s2.0-S266660222400065X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on acute coronary syndrome: Differences between epidemic waves\",\"authors\":\"Vincenzo Sucato,&nbsp;Giusy Sausa,&nbsp;Grazia Gambino,&nbsp;Alessandro D'Agostino,&nbsp;Salvatore Evola,&nbsp;Giuseppina Novo,&nbsp;Egle Corrado,&nbsp;Alfredo Ruggero Galassi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Since the beginning of the COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, poor attention has been paid to the indirect effects of the pandemia on cardiovascular health system, in particular in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The aims of this study is to compare possible epidemiological, clinical and management differences between the four epidemic waves in groups of patients hospitalized for ACS with a view to highlighting the burden of the pandemic on the management of this syndrome.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>In this retrospective observational study we included 98 patients admitted to Coronary Intensive Care Unit (CICU) for ACS between March 2020 and March 2022, who underwent revascularization procedure using percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI). The patients examined were divided into four groups representative of the four epidemic waves that affected our country.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The rate of hospitalization for ACS increased progressively to a 178 % increase in the third wave compared to the first (<em>p</em> = 0.003), with an increase of 900 % if we consider only Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) (representing 54 % of the ACS diagnoses of the third group against 14.3 % in the first). Longer door-to-balloon times were recorded in the third wave for the increased presence of NSTEMI. The average hospital stay was lower in the third wave with 5 ± 2 days (<em>p</em> = 0.007) as well as mortality (5.1 % in the third wave; the highest in the fourth wave with 9.5 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study show that the management of ACS suffered most from the indirect effects of the pandemic during the first wave, both because of the unpreparedness of hospital facilities and because of the fear of infection that has dissuaded people from asking for help.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice\",\"volume\":\"44 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100422\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266660222400065X/pdfft?md5=dbca308cd584ec34fe47bfca389253da&pid=1-s2.0-S266660222400065X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266660222400065X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266660222400065X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言自 2019 年 COronaVIrus 病(COVID-19)大流行开始以来,人们很少关注大流行对心血管健康系统的间接影响,尤其是对急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的影响。本研究的目的是比较四次疫情对急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)住院患者群体在流行病学、临床和管理方面可能造成的差异,以强调疫情对该综合征管理造成的负担。材料和方法在这项回顾性观察研究中,我们纳入了 2020 年 3 月至 2022 年 3 月期间因急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)入住冠心病重症监护病房(CICU),并接受经皮冠状动脉血管成形术(PCI)血管重建手术的 98 名患者。受检患者被分为四组,分别代表影响我国的四次流行病浪潮。结果与第一次流行病浪潮相比,第三次流行病浪潮的 ACS 住院率逐步上升,增加了 178%(p = 0.003),如果仅考虑非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI),则增加了 900%(占第三组 ACS 诊断的 54%,而第一组为 14.3%)。由于 NSTEMI 的增加,第三组患者的门到气球时间更长。第三组的平均住院时间较短,为 5 ± 2 天(p = 0.007),死亡率也较低(第三组为 5.1%;第四组最高,为 9.5%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on acute coronary syndrome: Differences between epidemic waves

Introduction

Since the beginning of the COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, poor attention has been paid to the indirect effects of the pandemia on cardiovascular health system, in particular in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The aims of this study is to compare possible epidemiological, clinical and management differences between the four epidemic waves in groups of patients hospitalized for ACS with a view to highlighting the burden of the pandemic on the management of this syndrome.

Materials and methods

In this retrospective observational study we included 98 patients admitted to Coronary Intensive Care Unit (CICU) for ACS between March 2020 and March 2022, who underwent revascularization procedure using percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI). The patients examined were divided into four groups representative of the four epidemic waves that affected our country.

Results

The rate of hospitalization for ACS increased progressively to a 178 % increase in the third wave compared to the first (p = 0.003), with an increase of 900 % if we consider only Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) (representing 54 % of the ACS diagnoses of the third group against 14.3 % in the first). Longer door-to-balloon times were recorded in the third wave for the increased presence of NSTEMI. The average hospital stay was lower in the third wave with 5 ± 2 days (p = 0.007) as well as mortality (5.1 % in the third wave; the highest in the fourth wave with 9.5 %).

Conclusions

The study show that the management of ACS suffered most from the indirect effects of the pandemic during the first wave, both because of the unpreparedness of hospital facilities and because of the fear of infection that has dissuaded people from asking for help.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
59 days
期刊最新文献
CMR and adverse clinical outcomes in peripartum cardiomyopathy The evaluation of combined fractional flow reserve and dynamic SPECT in chronic total occlusion Prevalence and risk factors associated with decompensated heart failure after successful elective cardioversion for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter Causal associations of Sjögren's syndrome with cardiovascular disease: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study Baseline inflammatory status affects the prognostic impact of statins in patients with peripheral arterial disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1