定性在线访谈:应用语言学研究人员的声音

Dongni Guo , Roberto L.M. Ramos , Fang Wang
{"title":"定性在线访谈:应用语言学研究人员的声音","authors":"Dongni Guo ,&nbsp;Roberto L.M. Ramos ,&nbsp;Fang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The power, convenience, and efficiency made possible by online communication tools have become increasingly important in qualitative research. The tradition's most central data collection method, interviewing, is in turn rapidly changing shape as these tools are integrated into data collection processes. Drawing from the perspective of interviewing as a social process (Talmy, 2010), as well as the Online Interviewing Ecology framework (Meskill et al., 2024), which includes three main elements—modalities, time, and relationship, this study examines the emerging strategies and characteristics of qualitative online interviewing in applied linguistics. Applying specific selection criteria, we interviewed the interviewer/authors of 6 recent empirical studies in applied linguistics that employed online qualitative interviewing for data collection. Thematic analysis of resulting transcripts in tandem with the authors' published empirical papers provides the basis for rich description of how researchers conceived of and deepened interviews through a dialogic meaning making approach. Findings suggest that online interviewing can be a very productive means for co-constructing meaning between interviewers and interviewees. Participants' responses also helped us to reconceive our initial framework: the interconnected categories of time and modalities serve to support the development of the interviewer-interviewee relationships that more directly shapes the flow and quality of the co-constructed interview discourse.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101075,"journal":{"name":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766124000363/pdfft?md5=2ded9776928e6784aeaebe233c72e703&pid=1-s2.0-S2772766124000363-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualitative online interviews: Voices of applied linguistics researchers\",\"authors\":\"Dongni Guo ,&nbsp;Roberto L.M. Ramos ,&nbsp;Fang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The power, convenience, and efficiency made possible by online communication tools have become increasingly important in qualitative research. The tradition's most central data collection method, interviewing, is in turn rapidly changing shape as these tools are integrated into data collection processes. Drawing from the perspective of interviewing as a social process (Talmy, 2010), as well as the Online Interviewing Ecology framework (Meskill et al., 2024), which includes three main elements—modalities, time, and relationship, this study examines the emerging strategies and characteristics of qualitative online interviewing in applied linguistics. Applying specific selection criteria, we interviewed the interviewer/authors of 6 recent empirical studies in applied linguistics that employed online qualitative interviewing for data collection. Thematic analysis of resulting transcripts in tandem with the authors' published empirical papers provides the basis for rich description of how researchers conceived of and deepened interviews through a dialogic meaning making approach. Findings suggest that online interviewing can be a very productive means for co-constructing meaning between interviewers and interviewees. Participants' responses also helped us to reconceive our initial framework: the interconnected categories of time and modalities serve to support the development of the interviewer-interviewee relationships that more directly shapes the flow and quality of the co-constructed interview discourse.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766124000363/pdfft?md5=2ded9776928e6784aeaebe233c72e703&pid=1-s2.0-S2772766124000363-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766124000363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766124000363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在线交流工具所带来的强大功能、便利和效率在定性研究中变得越来越重要。随着这些工具被整合到数据收集过程中,传统的最核心数据收集方法--访谈,也在迅速发生变化。本研究从访谈是一个社会过程的角度(Talmy,2010 年),以及在线访谈生态学框架(Meskill 等人,2024 年)(包括三个主要元素--模式、时间和关系)出发,研究了应用语言学中在线定性访谈的新兴策略和特点。根据特定的选择标准,我们采访了最近 6 项应用语言学实证研究的访谈者/作者,这些研究采用了在线定性访谈的方式收集数据。我们对访谈记录和作者发表的实证论文进行了主题分析,在此基础上丰富地描述了研究人员如何通过对话式意义建构方法构思和深化访谈。研究结果表明,在线访谈是访谈者与受访者共同建构意义的一种非常有效的方法。参与者的回答也帮助我们重新构思了最初的框架:时间和方式这两个相互关联的类别有助于发展访谈者与受访者之间的关系,从而更直接地塑造共同建构的访谈话语的流程和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Qualitative online interviews: Voices of applied linguistics researchers

The power, convenience, and efficiency made possible by online communication tools have become increasingly important in qualitative research. The tradition's most central data collection method, interviewing, is in turn rapidly changing shape as these tools are integrated into data collection processes. Drawing from the perspective of interviewing as a social process (Talmy, 2010), as well as the Online Interviewing Ecology framework (Meskill et al., 2024), which includes three main elements—modalities, time, and relationship, this study examines the emerging strategies and characteristics of qualitative online interviewing in applied linguistics. Applying specific selection criteria, we interviewed the interviewer/authors of 6 recent empirical studies in applied linguistics that employed online qualitative interviewing for data collection. Thematic analysis of resulting transcripts in tandem with the authors' published empirical papers provides the basis for rich description of how researchers conceived of and deepened interviews through a dialogic meaning making approach. Findings suggest that online interviewing can be a very productive means for co-constructing meaning between interviewers and interviewees. Participants' responses also helped us to reconceive our initial framework: the interconnected categories of time and modalities serve to support the development of the interviewer-interviewee relationships that more directly shapes the flow and quality of the co-constructed interview discourse.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Toward ethical praxis in longitudinal research with children: Reflecting on ethical tensions in participatory research A conversation analysis-complex dynamics systems theory (CA-CDST) approach for analyzing longitudinal development in L2 pragmatics Categorising speakers’ language background: Theoretical assumptions and methodological challenges for learner corpus research Data from role plays and elicited conversations: What do they show about L2 interactional competence?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1