动态加载下模式 II 和混合模式裂纹扩展的实验和虚拟测试

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL International Journal of Impact Engineering Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.105042
José M. Guerrero , Emilio V. González , José A. Artero , Adrián Cimadevilla , J.M. Rodríguez-Sereno , Joan A. Mayugo , Elisabeth De Blanpre , Vincent Jacques
{"title":"动态加载下模式 II 和混合模式裂纹扩展的实验和虚拟测试","authors":"José M. Guerrero ,&nbsp;Emilio V. González ,&nbsp;José A. Artero ,&nbsp;Adrián Cimadevilla ,&nbsp;J.M. Rodríguez-Sereno ,&nbsp;Joan A. Mayugo ,&nbsp;Elisabeth De Blanpre ,&nbsp;Vincent Jacques","doi":"10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.105042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Under static loading, measuring experimentally the mode II and mixed mode fracture toughness of composite materials and adhesive joints is well standardised. However, under dynamic loading, no standard procedure has been defined yet. Therefore, this paper proposes an experimental methodology to measure the mode II and mixed mode interlaminar fracture toughness of composite materials and adhesive joints. The methodology is based on a modified split Hopkinson compression bar. Two different data reduction schemes are explored and compared, one based on measuring the crack length, and another based on measuring the force from the strains in the transmitted bar. The two data reduction methods provided considerably different results. By using the method based on measuring the force, the mode II and mixed mode fracture toughness for both interlaminar and adhesive joints decreased for higher strain rates, while the opposite was found with the other approach. The method based on the crack length measurement was deemed to be unreliable due to the difficulties in measuring it.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50318,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X24001660/pdfft?md5=a7d5a1283d06a8fcac0310f352373be0&pid=1-s2.0-S0734743X24001660-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental and virtual testing of mode II and mixed mode crack propagation under dynamic loading\",\"authors\":\"José M. Guerrero ,&nbsp;Emilio V. González ,&nbsp;José A. Artero ,&nbsp;Adrián Cimadevilla ,&nbsp;J.M. Rodríguez-Sereno ,&nbsp;Joan A. Mayugo ,&nbsp;Elisabeth De Blanpre ,&nbsp;Vincent Jacques\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.105042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Under static loading, measuring experimentally the mode II and mixed mode fracture toughness of composite materials and adhesive joints is well standardised. However, under dynamic loading, no standard procedure has been defined yet. Therefore, this paper proposes an experimental methodology to measure the mode II and mixed mode interlaminar fracture toughness of composite materials and adhesive joints. The methodology is based on a modified split Hopkinson compression bar. Two different data reduction schemes are explored and compared, one based on measuring the crack length, and another based on measuring the force from the strains in the transmitted bar. The two data reduction methods provided considerably different results. By using the method based on measuring the force, the mode II and mixed mode fracture toughness for both interlaminar and adhesive joints decreased for higher strain rates, while the opposite was found with the other approach. The method based on the crack length measurement was deemed to be unreliable due to the difficulties in measuring it.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Impact Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X24001660/pdfft?md5=a7d5a1283d06a8fcac0310f352373be0&pid=1-s2.0-S0734743X24001660-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Impact Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X24001660\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X24001660","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在静态加载情况下,通过实验测量复合材料和粘合剂接头的模式 II 和混合模式断裂韧性已经非常标准化。然而,在动态载荷下,还没有确定标准程序。因此,本文提出了一种测量复合材料和粘合剂接头的模态 II 和混合模态层间断裂韧性的实验方法。该方法基于改进的分体式霍普金森压缩棒。本文探讨并比较了两种不同的数据还原方案,一种是基于裂缝长度的测量方法,另一种是基于传输杆应变的力测量方法。两种数据还原方法得出的结果大相径庭。通过使用基于力测量的方法,层间接头和粘合接头的模态 II 和混合模态断裂韧性在应变速率较高时都有所下降,而使用另一种方法则相反。基于裂缝长度测量的方法由于测量困难而被认为不可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental and virtual testing of mode II and mixed mode crack propagation under dynamic loading

Under static loading, measuring experimentally the mode II and mixed mode fracture toughness of composite materials and adhesive joints is well standardised. However, under dynamic loading, no standard procedure has been defined yet. Therefore, this paper proposes an experimental methodology to measure the mode II and mixed mode interlaminar fracture toughness of composite materials and adhesive joints. The methodology is based on a modified split Hopkinson compression bar. Two different data reduction schemes are explored and compared, one based on measuring the crack length, and another based on measuring the force from the strains in the transmitted bar. The two data reduction methods provided considerably different results. By using the method based on measuring the force, the mode II and mixed mode fracture toughness for both interlaminar and adhesive joints decreased for higher strain rates, while the opposite was found with the other approach. The method based on the crack length measurement was deemed to be unreliable due to the difficulties in measuring it.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Impact Engineering
International Journal of Impact Engineering 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
13.70%
发文量
241
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Impact Engineering, established in 1983 publishes original research findings related to the response of structures, components and materials subjected to impact, blast and high-rate loading. Areas relevant to the journal encompass the following general topics and those associated with them: -Behaviour and failure of structures and materials under impact and blast loading -Systems for protection and absorption of impact and blast loading -Terminal ballistics -Dynamic behaviour and failure of materials including plasticity and fracture -Stress waves -Structural crashworthiness -High-rate mechanical and forming processes -Impact, blast and high-rate loading/measurement techniques and their applications
期刊最新文献
Crack arrest characteristics and dynamic fracture parameters of moving cracks encountering double holes under impact loads Performance assessment of an innovative light and compact dust shield for DISC onboard Comet Interceptor/ESA space probes Analysis and evaluation of suitability of high-pressure dynamic constitutive model for concrete under blast and impact loading Dynamic failures at the metal-glass interface under impact loading Comparative investigation of shock pressure, shock duration, pressure decay time, and elastic energy of both porous gelatin and pure gelatin in shock state
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1