用于腹部放射治疗规划的 4D 磁共振成像技术系统综述

Lamyaa Aljaafari , David Bird , David L. Buckley , Bashar Al-Qaisieh , Richard Speight
{"title":"用于腹部放射治疗规划的 4D 磁共振成像技术系统综述","authors":"Lamyaa Aljaafari ,&nbsp;David Bird ,&nbsp;David L. Buckley ,&nbsp;Bashar Al-Qaisieh ,&nbsp;Richard Speight","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4DMRI) has gained interest as an alternative to the current standard for motion management four-dimensional tomography (4DCT) in abdominal radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP). This review aims to assess the 4DMRI literature in abdomen, focusing on technical considerations and the validity of using 4DMRI for patients within radiotherapy protocols.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed across the Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, covering all years up to December 31, 2023. The studies were grouped into two categories: 4DMRI reconstructed from 3DMRI acquisition; and 4DMRI reconstructed from multi-slice 2DMRI acquisition.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 39 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analysed to provide key findings. Key findings were 4DMRI had the potential to improve abdominal RTP for patients by providing accurate tumour definition and motion assessment compared to 4DCT. 4DMRI reconstructed from 3DMRI acquisition showed promise as a feasible approach for motion management in abdominal RTP regarding spatial resolution. Currently,the slice thickness achieved on 4DMRI reconstructed from multi-slice 2DMRI acquisitions was unsuitable for clinical purposes. Lastly, the current barriers for clinical implementation of 4DMRI were the limited availability of validated commercial solutions and the lack of larger cohort comparative studies to 4DCT for target delineation and plan optimisation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>4DMRI showed potential improvements in abdominal RTP, but standards and guidelines for the use of 4DMRI in radiotherapy were required to demonstrate clinical benefits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000745/pdfft?md5=b91ec6c4d2ad12fdf4baa92b0aec37c2&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000745-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of 4D magnetic resonance imaging techniques for abdominal radiotherapy treatment planning\",\"authors\":\"Lamyaa Aljaafari ,&nbsp;David Bird ,&nbsp;David L. Buckley ,&nbsp;Bashar Al-Qaisieh ,&nbsp;Richard Speight\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4DMRI) has gained interest as an alternative to the current standard for motion management four-dimensional tomography (4DCT) in abdominal radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP). This review aims to assess the 4DMRI literature in abdomen, focusing on technical considerations and the validity of using 4DMRI for patients within radiotherapy protocols.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed across the Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, covering all years up to December 31, 2023. The studies were grouped into two categories: 4DMRI reconstructed from 3DMRI acquisition; and 4DMRI reconstructed from multi-slice 2DMRI acquisition.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 39 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analysed to provide key findings. Key findings were 4DMRI had the potential to improve abdominal RTP for patients by providing accurate tumour definition and motion assessment compared to 4DCT. 4DMRI reconstructed from 3DMRI acquisition showed promise as a feasible approach for motion management in abdominal RTP regarding spatial resolution. Currently,the slice thickness achieved on 4DMRI reconstructed from multi-slice 2DMRI acquisitions was unsuitable for clinical purposes. Lastly, the current barriers for clinical implementation of 4DMRI were the limited availability of validated commercial solutions and the lack of larger cohort comparative studies to 4DCT for target delineation and plan optimisation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>4DMRI showed potential improvements in abdominal RTP, but standards and guidelines for the use of 4DMRI in radiotherapy were required to demonstrate clinical benefits.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000745/pdfft?md5=b91ec6c4d2ad12fdf4baa92b0aec37c2&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000745-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000745\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的在腹部放疗治疗计划(RTP)中,四维磁共振成像(4DMRI)作为运动管理四维断层扫描(4DCT)现行标准的替代方法,已经引起了人们的兴趣。本综述旨在评估腹部 4DMRI 文献,重点关注放疗方案中患者使用 4DMRI 的技术考虑因素和有效性。我们在 Medline、Embase、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库中进行了全面检索,涵盖截至 2023 年 12 月 31 日的所有年份。研究分为两类:结果 共有 39 项研究符合纳入标准,经分析后得出了主要结论。主要发现有:与 4DCT 相比,4DMRI 可提供准确的肿瘤定义和运动评估,从而有可能改善患者的腹部 RTP。从3DMRI采集重建的4DMRI在空间分辨率方面显示出作为腹部RTP运动管理的可行方法的前景。目前,由多切片 2DMRI 采集重建的 4DMRI 所达到的切片厚度不适合临床用途。最后,4DMRI 目前在临床应用中遇到的障碍是经过验证的商业解决方案有限,以及缺乏与 4DCT 在靶区划分和计划优化方面的大型队列比较研究。结论 4DMRI 显示出在腹部 RTP 方面的潜在改进,但需要制定在放疗中使用 4DMRI 的标准和指南,以证明其临床效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A systematic review of 4D magnetic resonance imaging techniques for abdominal radiotherapy treatment planning

Background and purpose

Four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4DMRI) has gained interest as an alternative to the current standard for motion management four-dimensional tomography (4DCT) in abdominal radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP). This review aims to assess the 4DMRI literature in abdomen, focusing on technical considerations and the validity of using 4DMRI for patients within radiotherapy protocols.

Materials and methods

The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed across the Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, covering all years up to December 31, 2023. The studies were grouped into two categories: 4DMRI reconstructed from 3DMRI acquisition; and 4DMRI reconstructed from multi-slice 2DMRI acquisition.

Results

A total of 39 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analysed to provide key findings. Key findings were 4DMRI had the potential to improve abdominal RTP for patients by providing accurate tumour definition and motion assessment compared to 4DCT. 4DMRI reconstructed from 3DMRI acquisition showed promise as a feasible approach for motion management in abdominal RTP regarding spatial resolution. Currently,the slice thickness achieved on 4DMRI reconstructed from multi-slice 2DMRI acquisitions was unsuitable for clinical purposes. Lastly, the current barriers for clinical implementation of 4DMRI were the limited availability of validated commercial solutions and the lack of larger cohort comparative studies to 4DCT for target delineation and plan optimisation.

Conclusion

4DMRI showed potential improvements in abdominal RTP, but standards and guidelines for the use of 4DMRI in radiotherapy were required to demonstrate clinical benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Results of 2023 survey on the use of synthetic computed tomography for magnetic resonance Imaging-only radiotherapy: Current status and future steps Head and neck automatic multi-organ segmentation on Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Automatic segmentation for magnetic resonance imaging guided individual elective lymph node irradiation in head and neck cancer patients Development of a novel 3D-printed dynamic anthropomorphic thorax phantom for evaluation of four-dimensional computed tomography Technical feasibility of delivering a simultaneous integrated boost in partial breast irradiation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1