微观街道元素对行动不便者主动交通的影响:系统回顾

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Transport & Health Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jth.2024.101842
Alexandra-Ioana Georgescu , Hoda Allahbakhshi , Robert Weibel
{"title":"微观街道元素对行动不便者主动交通的影响:系统回顾","authors":"Alexandra-Ioana Georgescu ,&nbsp;Hoda Allahbakhshi ,&nbsp;Robert Weibel","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2024.101842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Ensuring adequate spatial accessibility to diverse facilities is essential to shaping sustainable, inclusive cities and increasing the well-being of citizens. However, mobility-restricted individuals are found to have lower spatial accessibility in urban areas due to contextual factors, such as physical barriers. Most accessibility assessments focus on the general population and use the road network, due to the lack of data on how contextual factors influence different individuals and lack of geographical data representing pedestrian infrastructure or accessibility features.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched three databases: Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed. After filtering for eligibility, we examined the remaining 20 studies to understand the perceptions mobility-restricted individuals (i.e., mobility-impaired, visually impaired, or older adults) have of microscale street elements present in urban environments. Data regarding target population groups, data collection methods used and mentioned street elements were extracted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The included works tend to focus on a single population group, and disregard within-group differences regarding mobility capacities. Qualitative methods, such as interviews, focus groups and questionnaires, are most frequently used to investigate individual perceptions. To a great extent, individuals perceive microscale street elements differently depending on their mobility capacities. Even if partial overlap exists between population groups, when considering the frequency with which the street elements were mentioned, the impact on their individual accessibility may differ drastically. Certain street elements were highlighted, which can have a twofold effect, acting as barriers for some individuals and facilitators for others.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results show that contradicting needs stemming from between- and within-group heterogeneities, together with the highly contextual character of spatial accessibility, pose extensive challenges for designing a barrier-free space for everyone. The results of this review provide a basis for urban planners and policymakers to design the urban infrastructure from a more inclusive perspective, based on comprehensive knowledge.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 101842"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140524000884/pdfft?md5=5b8e287ac9c7de189e0bf48b65198069&pid=1-s2.0-S2214140524000884-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of microscale street elements on active transport of mobility-restricted individuals: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra-Ioana Georgescu ,&nbsp;Hoda Allahbakhshi ,&nbsp;Robert Weibel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jth.2024.101842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Ensuring adequate spatial accessibility to diverse facilities is essential to shaping sustainable, inclusive cities and increasing the well-being of citizens. However, mobility-restricted individuals are found to have lower spatial accessibility in urban areas due to contextual factors, such as physical barriers. Most accessibility assessments focus on the general population and use the road network, due to the lack of data on how contextual factors influence different individuals and lack of geographical data representing pedestrian infrastructure or accessibility features.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched three databases: Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed. After filtering for eligibility, we examined the remaining 20 studies to understand the perceptions mobility-restricted individuals (i.e., mobility-impaired, visually impaired, or older adults) have of microscale street elements present in urban environments. Data regarding target population groups, data collection methods used and mentioned street elements were extracted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The included works tend to focus on a single population group, and disregard within-group differences regarding mobility capacities. Qualitative methods, such as interviews, focus groups and questionnaires, are most frequently used to investigate individual perceptions. To a great extent, individuals perceive microscale street elements differently depending on their mobility capacities. Even if partial overlap exists between population groups, when considering the frequency with which the street elements were mentioned, the impact on their individual accessibility may differ drastically. Certain street elements were highlighted, which can have a twofold effect, acting as barriers for some individuals and facilitators for others.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results show that contradicting needs stemming from between- and within-group heterogeneities, together with the highly contextual character of spatial accessibility, pose extensive challenges for designing a barrier-free space for everyone. The results of this review provide a basis for urban planners and policymakers to design the urban infrastructure from a more inclusive perspective, based on comprehensive knowledge.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101842\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140524000884/pdfft?md5=5b8e287ac9c7de189e0bf48b65198069&pid=1-s2.0-S2214140524000884-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140524000884\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140524000884","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景确保各种设施在空间上的充分可达性,对于塑造可持续的包容性城市和提高市民的福祉至关重要。然而,由于物理障碍等环境因素,行动不便的人在城市地区的空间可达性较低。由于缺乏关于环境因素如何影响不同个体的数据,以及缺乏代表行人基础设施或无障碍特征的地理数据,大多数无障碍评估都侧重于普通人群并使用道路网络:我们检索了三个数据库:Scopus、Web of Science 和 PubMed。经过资格筛选,我们对剩余的 20 项研究进行了检查,以了解行动受限者(即行动不便者、视障者或老年人)对城市环境中存在的微观街道元素的看法。研究提取了有关目标人群、所使用的数据收集方法以及所提及的街道元素等方面的数据。访谈、焦点小组和问卷调查等定性方法最常用于调查个人看法。在很大程度上,个人对街道微观要素的感知因其移动能力的不同而不同。即使人口群体之间存在部分重叠,但考虑到街道元素被提及的频率,其对个人可达性的影响可能会大不相同。结论:研究结果表明,群体间和群体内的异质性所产生的相互矛盾的需求,以及空间无障碍的高度情境性,为设计人人享有的无障碍空间带来了巨大挑战。本综述的结果为城市规划者和政策制定者提供了一个基础,使他们能够以全面的知识为基础,从更具包容性的角度设计城市基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of microscale street elements on active transport of mobility-restricted individuals: A systematic review

Background

Ensuring adequate spatial accessibility to diverse facilities is essential to shaping sustainable, inclusive cities and increasing the well-being of citizens. However, mobility-restricted individuals are found to have lower spatial accessibility in urban areas due to contextual factors, such as physical barriers. Most accessibility assessments focus on the general population and use the road network, due to the lack of data on how contextual factors influence different individuals and lack of geographical data representing pedestrian infrastructure or accessibility features.

Methods

We searched three databases: Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed. After filtering for eligibility, we examined the remaining 20 studies to understand the perceptions mobility-restricted individuals (i.e., mobility-impaired, visually impaired, or older adults) have of microscale street elements present in urban environments. Data regarding target population groups, data collection methods used and mentioned street elements were extracted.

Results

The included works tend to focus on a single population group, and disregard within-group differences regarding mobility capacities. Qualitative methods, such as interviews, focus groups and questionnaires, are most frequently used to investigate individual perceptions. To a great extent, individuals perceive microscale street elements differently depending on their mobility capacities. Even if partial overlap exists between population groups, when considering the frequency with which the street elements were mentioned, the impact on their individual accessibility may differ drastically. Certain street elements were highlighted, which can have a twofold effect, acting as barriers for some individuals and facilitators for others.

Conclusion

The results show that contradicting needs stemming from between- and within-group heterogeneities, together with the highly contextual character of spatial accessibility, pose extensive challenges for designing a barrier-free space for everyone. The results of this review provide a basis for urban planners and policymakers to design the urban infrastructure from a more inclusive perspective, based on comprehensive knowledge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Acceptability of a city-wide transport plan: A thematic analysis of written consultation responses Does mental health influence commuters’ mode choice? A cross-sectional assessment from the Netherlands Understanding COVID-19 pandemic-related shifts in active commute patterns: Insights from employees of a Canadian university Neighborhood facilities and physical self-efficacy of older adults: The mediating role of daily activity opportunities An exploratory study of the transportation modes associated with community participation among adults with serious mental illnesses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1