组织网络研究中的模拟数据和模拟模型案例

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Research Policy Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2024.105058
Ivan Belik , Prasanta Bhattacharya , Eirik Sjåholm Knudsen
{"title":"组织网络研究中的模拟数据和模拟模型案例","authors":"Ivan Belik ,&nbsp;Prasanta Bhattacharya ,&nbsp;Eirik Sjåholm Knudsen","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social networks shape innovation dynamics both within- and across organizations. Unfortunately, obtaining relevant and high-quality data on social networks is often a challenge. We argue that simulated networks and simulation-based models can be a valuable complement, and even a viable substitute, to real-world network data in innovation research and beyond. We draw on a review of network simulation models and methods to illustrate how researchers can utilize simulations in ways that are grounded in empirical best practice. Furthermore, we explain how simulation models can be used to build new and richer networks, either from scratch or by using existing real networks as the point of departure. As an illustration, we compare four widely used empirical organizational networks with their simulated counterparts to show that simulations can indeed be used to mimic certain core properties of real-world networks. At the same time, we also emphasize that domain expertise from researchers is critical for model selection, specification, and tuning. Finally, we offer a prescriptive framework on the generation, modeling, estimation, and validation of simulation procedures, to help researchers make greater use of simulated data and simulation-based models in empirical innovation research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"53 8","pages":"Article 105058"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324001070/pdfft?md5=f0d0aac2ac6c645c3afa7d095d7342c6&pid=1-s2.0-S0048733324001070-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A case for simulated data and simulation-based models in organizational network research\",\"authors\":\"Ivan Belik ,&nbsp;Prasanta Bhattacharya ,&nbsp;Eirik Sjåholm Knudsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Social networks shape innovation dynamics both within- and across organizations. Unfortunately, obtaining relevant and high-quality data on social networks is often a challenge. We argue that simulated networks and simulation-based models can be a valuable complement, and even a viable substitute, to real-world network data in innovation research and beyond. We draw on a review of network simulation models and methods to illustrate how researchers can utilize simulations in ways that are grounded in empirical best practice. Furthermore, we explain how simulation models can be used to build new and richer networks, either from scratch or by using existing real networks as the point of departure. As an illustration, we compare four widely used empirical organizational networks with their simulated counterparts to show that simulations can indeed be used to mimic certain core properties of real-world networks. At the same time, we also emphasize that domain expertise from researchers is critical for model selection, specification, and tuning. Finally, we offer a prescriptive framework on the generation, modeling, estimation, and validation of simulation procedures, to help researchers make greater use of simulated data and simulation-based models in empirical innovation research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Policy\",\"volume\":\"53 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 105058\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324001070/pdfft?md5=f0d0aac2ac6c645c3afa7d095d7342c6&pid=1-s2.0-S0048733324001070-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324001070\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324001070","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会网络影响着组织内部和组织之间的创新动态。遗憾的是,获取相关的高质量社会网络数据往往是一项挑战。我们认为,在创新研究及其他领域,模拟网络和基于模拟的模型可以成为真实世界网络数据的重要补充,甚至是可行的替代品。我们通过对网络仿真模型和方法的回顾,说明了研究人员如何以实证最佳实践为基础利用仿真模型。此外,我们还解释了如何利用模拟模型从零开始或以现有的真实网络为出发点,建立新的、更丰富的网络。作为例证,我们将四个广泛使用的经验性组织网络与模拟网络进行了比较,以说明模拟确实可以用来模拟现实世界网络的某些核心属性。同时,我们也强调,研究人员的领域专业知识对于模型的选择、规范和调整至关重要。最后,我们提供了一个关于模拟程序的生成、建模、估算和验证的规范性框架,以帮助研究人员在实证创新研究中更多地利用模拟数据和基于模拟的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A case for simulated data and simulation-based models in organizational network research

Social networks shape innovation dynamics both within- and across organizations. Unfortunately, obtaining relevant and high-quality data on social networks is often a challenge. We argue that simulated networks and simulation-based models can be a valuable complement, and even a viable substitute, to real-world network data in innovation research and beyond. We draw on a review of network simulation models and methods to illustrate how researchers can utilize simulations in ways that are grounded in empirical best practice. Furthermore, we explain how simulation models can be used to build new and richer networks, either from scratch or by using existing real networks as the point of departure. As an illustration, we compare four widely used empirical organizational networks with their simulated counterparts to show that simulations can indeed be used to mimic certain core properties of real-world networks. At the same time, we also emphasize that domain expertise from researchers is critical for model selection, specification, and tuning. Finally, we offer a prescriptive framework on the generation, modeling, estimation, and validation of simulation procedures, to help researchers make greater use of simulated data and simulation-based models in empirical innovation research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research Policy
Research Policy MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Research Policy (RP) articles explore the interaction between innovation, technology, or research, and economic, social, political, and organizational processes, both empirically and theoretically. All RP papers are expected to provide insights with implications for policy or management. Research Policy (RP) is a multidisciplinary journal focused on analyzing, understanding, and effectively addressing the challenges posed by innovation, technology, R&D, and science. This includes activities related to knowledge creation, diffusion, acquisition, and exploitation in the form of new or improved products, processes, or services, across economic, policy, management, organizational, and environmental dimensions.
期刊最新文献
“Meet me at the backdoor”: A multiple case study of academic entrepreneurs bypassing their technology transfer offices Governance of knowledge development in a public-private partnership: NASA's efforts to design the Space Shuttle Editorial Board Interfaces, social information processing, and diversity cascades: How board diversity influences invention output The Government Patent Register: A new resource for measuring U.S. government-funded patenting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1