Alice Fattori , Anna Comotti , Paolo Brambilla , Matteo Bonzini
{"title":"精神痛苦是医护人员心理健康受损的一个持久性风险因素","authors":"Alice Fattori , Anna Comotti , Paolo Brambilla , Matteo Bonzini","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Moral distress among healthcare workers (HCWs) has dramatically increased during Covid-19 emergency however most evidence relies on cross-sectional data collected during Covid-19 early stages.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This longitudinal cohort study aims to provide a better insight into the occurrence and associations of moral distress, focusing on both its short and long-term impact on HCWs’ mental health.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 990 healthcare workers completed a mental health evaluation between July 2020-July 2021 (Time 1) reporting frequencies of moral distress and psychological distress (GHQ-12), post-traumatic (IES-R) and anxiety (GAD-7) symptoms; after one year (July 2021-July 2022; Time 2), 310 participants repeated the psychological evaluation. We investigated differences considering socio-demographic and occupational characteristics. Two logistic regression models examined the potential role of moral distress as a risk factor for scorings above scales’ cut-offs at Time 1 and at Time 2.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Frequent episodes of moral distress were mostly reported by nurses (24 %), physicians (22 %), younger workers (<40y; 23 %) and workers engaged in Covid-19 area; HCWs from Emergency/Intensive Care Departments reported the highest occurrence of moral distress (29 %). Results showed increases in all psychological symptoms as episodes of moral distress became more frequent. Moral distress experienced at Time 1 resulted as a persistent risk for mental health impairment in the following year, with stable ORs for post-traumatic symptoms (Time1 OR=7.8, 95 %CI=(5.3,11.6) and Time2 OR=6.6, 95 %CI=(2.9,15.7).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings support long-term consequences of moral distress; preventive strategies may be addressed with priority to younger HCWs and nurses/physicians from Emergency and Intensive Care Departments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100817"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324001033/pdfft?md5=9ccc1451624253bf53dc9eb91914dbb4&pid=1-s2.0-S2666915324001033-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral distress as a persistent risk factor for impaired mental health among healthcare workforce\",\"authors\":\"Alice Fattori , Anna Comotti , Paolo Brambilla , Matteo Bonzini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Moral distress among healthcare workers (HCWs) has dramatically increased during Covid-19 emergency however most evidence relies on cross-sectional data collected during Covid-19 early stages.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This longitudinal cohort study aims to provide a better insight into the occurrence and associations of moral distress, focusing on both its short and long-term impact on HCWs’ mental health.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 990 healthcare workers completed a mental health evaluation between July 2020-July 2021 (Time 1) reporting frequencies of moral distress and psychological distress (GHQ-12), post-traumatic (IES-R) and anxiety (GAD-7) symptoms; after one year (July 2021-July 2022; Time 2), 310 participants repeated the psychological evaluation. We investigated differences considering socio-demographic and occupational characteristics. Two logistic regression models examined the potential role of moral distress as a risk factor for scorings above scales’ cut-offs at Time 1 and at Time 2.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Frequent episodes of moral distress were mostly reported by nurses (24 %), physicians (22 %), younger workers (<40y; 23 %) and workers engaged in Covid-19 area; HCWs from Emergency/Intensive Care Departments reported the highest occurrence of moral distress (29 %). Results showed increases in all psychological symptoms as episodes of moral distress became more frequent. Moral distress experienced at Time 1 resulted as a persistent risk for mental health impairment in the following year, with stable ORs for post-traumatic symptoms (Time1 OR=7.8, 95 %CI=(5.3,11.6) and Time2 OR=6.6, 95 %CI=(2.9,15.7).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings support long-term consequences of moral distress; preventive strategies may be addressed with priority to younger HCWs and nurses/physicians from Emergency and Intensive Care Departments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100817\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324001033/pdfft?md5=9ccc1451624253bf53dc9eb91914dbb4&pid=1-s2.0-S2666915324001033-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324001033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324001033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
Moral distress as a persistent risk factor for impaired mental health among healthcare workforce
Background
Moral distress among healthcare workers (HCWs) has dramatically increased during Covid-19 emergency however most evidence relies on cross-sectional data collected during Covid-19 early stages.
Aims
This longitudinal cohort study aims to provide a better insight into the occurrence and associations of moral distress, focusing on both its short and long-term impact on HCWs’ mental health.
Methods
A total of 990 healthcare workers completed a mental health evaluation between July 2020-July 2021 (Time 1) reporting frequencies of moral distress and psychological distress (GHQ-12), post-traumatic (IES-R) and anxiety (GAD-7) symptoms; after one year (July 2021-July 2022; Time 2), 310 participants repeated the psychological evaluation. We investigated differences considering socio-demographic and occupational characteristics. Two logistic regression models examined the potential role of moral distress as a risk factor for scorings above scales’ cut-offs at Time 1 and at Time 2.
Results
Frequent episodes of moral distress were mostly reported by nurses (24 %), physicians (22 %), younger workers (<40y; 23 %) and workers engaged in Covid-19 area; HCWs from Emergency/Intensive Care Departments reported the highest occurrence of moral distress (29 %). Results showed increases in all psychological symptoms as episodes of moral distress became more frequent. Moral distress experienced at Time 1 resulted as a persistent risk for mental health impairment in the following year, with stable ORs for post-traumatic symptoms (Time1 OR=7.8, 95 %CI=(5.3,11.6) and Time2 OR=6.6, 95 %CI=(2.9,15.7).
Conclusions
Our findings support long-term consequences of moral distress; preventive strategies may be addressed with priority to younger HCWs and nurses/physicians from Emergency and Intensive Care Departments.