精神痛苦是医护人员心理健康受损的一个持久性风险因素

Alice Fattori , Anna Comotti , Paolo Brambilla , Matteo Bonzini
{"title":"精神痛苦是医护人员心理健康受损的一个持久性风险因素","authors":"Alice Fattori ,&nbsp;Anna Comotti ,&nbsp;Paolo Brambilla ,&nbsp;Matteo Bonzini","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Moral distress among healthcare workers (HCWs) has dramatically increased during Covid-19 emergency however most evidence relies on cross-sectional data collected during Covid-19 early stages.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This longitudinal cohort study aims to provide a better insight into the occurrence and associations of moral distress, focusing on both its short and long-term impact on HCWs’ mental health.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 990 healthcare workers completed a mental health evaluation between July 2020-July 2021 (Time 1) reporting frequencies of moral distress and psychological distress (GHQ-12), post-traumatic (IES-R) and anxiety (GAD-7) symptoms; after one year (July 2021-July 2022; Time 2), 310 participants repeated the psychological evaluation. We investigated differences considering socio-demographic and occupational characteristics. Two logistic regression models examined the potential role of moral distress as a risk factor for scorings above scales’ cut-offs at Time 1 and at Time 2.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Frequent episodes of moral distress were mostly reported by nurses (24 %), physicians (22 %), younger workers (&lt;40y; 23 %) and workers engaged in Covid-19 area; HCWs from Emergency/Intensive Care Departments reported the highest occurrence of moral distress (29 %). Results showed increases in all psychological symptoms as episodes of moral distress became more frequent. Moral distress experienced at Time 1 resulted as a persistent risk for mental health impairment in the following year, with stable ORs for post-traumatic symptoms (Time1 OR=7.8, 95 %CI=(5.3,11.6) and Time2 OR=6.6, 95 %CI=(2.9,15.7).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings support long-term consequences of moral distress; preventive strategies may be addressed with priority to younger HCWs and nurses/physicians from Emergency and Intensive Care Departments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100817"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324001033/pdfft?md5=9ccc1451624253bf53dc9eb91914dbb4&pid=1-s2.0-S2666915324001033-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral distress as a persistent risk factor for impaired mental health among healthcare workforce\",\"authors\":\"Alice Fattori ,&nbsp;Anna Comotti ,&nbsp;Paolo Brambilla ,&nbsp;Matteo Bonzini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Moral distress among healthcare workers (HCWs) has dramatically increased during Covid-19 emergency however most evidence relies on cross-sectional data collected during Covid-19 early stages.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This longitudinal cohort study aims to provide a better insight into the occurrence and associations of moral distress, focusing on both its short and long-term impact on HCWs’ mental health.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 990 healthcare workers completed a mental health evaluation between July 2020-July 2021 (Time 1) reporting frequencies of moral distress and psychological distress (GHQ-12), post-traumatic (IES-R) and anxiety (GAD-7) symptoms; after one year (July 2021-July 2022; Time 2), 310 participants repeated the psychological evaluation. We investigated differences considering socio-demographic and occupational characteristics. Two logistic regression models examined the potential role of moral distress as a risk factor for scorings above scales’ cut-offs at Time 1 and at Time 2.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Frequent episodes of moral distress were mostly reported by nurses (24 %), physicians (22 %), younger workers (&lt;40y; 23 %) and workers engaged in Covid-19 area; HCWs from Emergency/Intensive Care Departments reported the highest occurrence of moral distress (29 %). Results showed increases in all psychological symptoms as episodes of moral distress became more frequent. Moral distress experienced at Time 1 resulted as a persistent risk for mental health impairment in the following year, with stable ORs for post-traumatic symptoms (Time1 OR=7.8, 95 %CI=(5.3,11.6) and Time2 OR=6.6, 95 %CI=(2.9,15.7).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings support long-term consequences of moral distress; preventive strategies may be addressed with priority to younger HCWs and nurses/physicians from Emergency and Intensive Care Departments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100817\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324001033/pdfft?md5=9ccc1451624253bf53dc9eb91914dbb4&pid=1-s2.0-S2666915324001033-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324001033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324001033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在 Covid-19 紧急事件期间,医护人员(HCWs)的道德困扰急剧增加,但大多数证据都依赖于在 Covid-19 早期阶段收集的横断面数据。目的这项纵向队列研究旨在更好地了解道德困扰的发生和关联,重点关注其对医护人员心理健康的短期和长期影响。方法 共有990名医护人员在2020年7月至2021年7月(时间1)期间完成了心理健康评估,报告了道德困扰和心理困扰(GHQ-12)、创伤后(IES-R)和焦虑(GAD-7)症状的频率;一年后(2021年7月至2022年7月;时间2),310名参与者重复了心理评估。我们调查了社会人口特征和职业特征的差异。结果护士(24%)、医生(22%)、年轻工人(<40y; 23%)和从事 Covid-19 领域工作的工人报告的精神压力发作频率最高(29%)。结果显示,随着道德困扰发生的频率增加,所有心理症状也随之增加。结论:我们的研究结果支持道德困扰的长期后果;预防策略可优先考虑年轻的医护人员以及急诊科和重症监护室的护士/医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Moral distress as a persistent risk factor for impaired mental health among healthcare workforce

Background

Moral distress among healthcare workers (HCWs) has dramatically increased during Covid-19 emergency however most evidence relies on cross-sectional data collected during Covid-19 early stages.

Aims

This longitudinal cohort study aims to provide a better insight into the occurrence and associations of moral distress, focusing on both its short and long-term impact on HCWs’ mental health.

Methods

A total of 990 healthcare workers completed a mental health evaluation between July 2020-July 2021 (Time 1) reporting frequencies of moral distress and psychological distress (GHQ-12), post-traumatic (IES-R) and anxiety (GAD-7) symptoms; after one year (July 2021-July 2022; Time 2), 310 participants repeated the psychological evaluation. We investigated differences considering socio-demographic and occupational characteristics. Two logistic regression models examined the potential role of moral distress as a risk factor for scorings above scales’ cut-offs at Time 1 and at Time 2.

Results

Frequent episodes of moral distress were mostly reported by nurses (24 %), physicians (22 %), younger workers (<40y; 23 %) and workers engaged in Covid-19 area; HCWs from Emergency/Intensive Care Departments reported the highest occurrence of moral distress (29 %). Results showed increases in all psychological symptoms as episodes of moral distress became more frequent. Moral distress experienced at Time 1 resulted as a persistent risk for mental health impairment in the following year, with stable ORs for post-traumatic symptoms (Time1 OR=7.8, 95 %CI=(5.3,11.6) and Time2 OR=6.6, 95 %CI=(2.9,15.7).

Conclusions

Our findings support long-term consequences of moral distress; preventive strategies may be addressed with priority to younger HCWs and nurses/physicians from Emergency and Intensive Care Departments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
134 days
期刊最新文献
Mature brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in serum correlate with symptom severity in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Disentangling the relationships of health-related quality of life, depressive symptoms, disability and social support after stroke: A network analysis Implementing group therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder within a primary care setting: A pilot study Developing and validating the Sierra Leone perinatal psychological distress scale through an emic-etic approach Examining concurrent and longitudinal associations between quality of interpersonal relations and depressive symptoms among young adults in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1