对耳鸣中不同声音可预测性水平的平行脑电图评估

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Hearing Research Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1016/j.heares.2024.109073
Pia Brinkmann , Jana V.P. Devos , Jelle H.M. van der Eerden , Jasper V. Smit , Marcus L.F. Janssen , Sonja A. Kotz , Michael Schwartze
{"title":"对耳鸣中不同声音可预测性水平的平行脑电图评估","authors":"Pia Brinkmann ,&nbsp;Jana V.P. Devos ,&nbsp;Jelle H.M. van der Eerden ,&nbsp;Jasper V. Smit ,&nbsp;Marcus L.F. Janssen ,&nbsp;Sonja A. Kotz ,&nbsp;Michael Schwartze","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2024.109073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tinnitus denotes the perception of a non-environmental sound and might result from aberrant auditory prediction. Successful prediction of formal (e.g., type) and temporal sound characteristics facilitates the filtering of irrelevant information, also labelled as ‘sensory gating’ (SG). Here, we explored if and how parallel manipulations of formal prediction violations and temporal predictability affect SG in persons with and without tinnitus. Age-, education- and sex-matched persons with and without tinnitus (<em>N</em> = 52) participated and listened to paired-tone oddball sequences, varying in formal (standard vs. deviant pitch) and temporal predictability (isochronous vs. random timing). EEG was recorded from 128 channels and data were analyzed by means of temporal spatial principal component analysis (tsPCA). SG was assessed by amplitude suppression for the 2nd tone in a pair and was observed in P50-like activity in both timing conditions and groups. Correspondingly, deviants elicited overall larger amplitudes than standards. However, only persons without tinnitus displayed a larger N100-like deviance response in the isochronous compared to the random timing condition. This result might imply that persons with tinnitus do not benefit similarly as persons without tinnitus from temporal predictability in deviance processing. Thus, persons with tinnitus might display less temporal sensitivity in auditory processing than persons without tinnitus.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12881,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595524001266/pdfft?md5=b3f978167e26f37c57eb2438f60fe330&pid=1-s2.0-S0378595524001266-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parallel EEG assessment of different sound predictability levels in tinnitus\",\"authors\":\"Pia Brinkmann ,&nbsp;Jana V.P. Devos ,&nbsp;Jelle H.M. van der Eerden ,&nbsp;Jasper V. Smit ,&nbsp;Marcus L.F. Janssen ,&nbsp;Sonja A. Kotz ,&nbsp;Michael Schwartze\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.heares.2024.109073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Tinnitus denotes the perception of a non-environmental sound and might result from aberrant auditory prediction. Successful prediction of formal (e.g., type) and temporal sound characteristics facilitates the filtering of irrelevant information, also labelled as ‘sensory gating’ (SG). Here, we explored if and how parallel manipulations of formal prediction violations and temporal predictability affect SG in persons with and without tinnitus. Age-, education- and sex-matched persons with and without tinnitus (<em>N</em> = 52) participated and listened to paired-tone oddball sequences, varying in formal (standard vs. deviant pitch) and temporal predictability (isochronous vs. random timing). EEG was recorded from 128 channels and data were analyzed by means of temporal spatial principal component analysis (tsPCA). SG was assessed by amplitude suppression for the 2nd tone in a pair and was observed in P50-like activity in both timing conditions and groups. Correspondingly, deviants elicited overall larger amplitudes than standards. However, only persons without tinnitus displayed a larger N100-like deviance response in the isochronous compared to the random timing condition. This result might imply that persons with tinnitus do not benefit similarly as persons without tinnitus from temporal predictability in deviance processing. Thus, persons with tinnitus might display less temporal sensitivity in auditory processing than persons without tinnitus.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hearing Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595524001266/pdfft?md5=b3f978167e26f37c57eb2438f60fe330&pid=1-s2.0-S0378595524001266-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hearing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595524001266\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595524001266","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

耳鸣表示对非环境声音的感知,可能是由于听觉预测失常造成的。成功预测声音的形式特征(如类型)和时间特征有助于过滤无关信息,这也被称为 "感觉门控"(SG)。在此,我们探讨了并行处理形式预测违规和时间可预测性是否以及如何影响耳鸣患者和非耳鸣患者的 SG。年龄、学历和性别相匹配的耳鸣患者和非耳鸣患者(N = 52)参与并聆听了配对音奇数序列,这些序列在形式(标准音高与偏差音高)和时间可预测性(等时与随机计时)方面各不相同。脑电图由 128 个通道记录,数据通过时空主成分分析法(tsPCA)进行分析。SG 通过一对音调中第二个音调的振幅抑制进行评估,并在两种计时条件和两组中观察到类似 P50 的活动。相应地,偏差者引起的振幅总体上大于标准者。然而,与随机计时条件相比,只有没有耳鸣的人在等时计时条件下表现出更大的 N100 类偏差反应。这一结果可能意味着,在偏差处理过程中,耳鸣患者无法像无耳鸣患者一样从时间可预测性中获益。因此,与没有耳鸣的人相比,耳鸣患者在听觉处理过程中对时间的敏感性可能较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Parallel EEG assessment of different sound predictability levels in tinnitus

Tinnitus denotes the perception of a non-environmental sound and might result from aberrant auditory prediction. Successful prediction of formal (e.g., type) and temporal sound characteristics facilitates the filtering of irrelevant information, also labelled as ‘sensory gating’ (SG). Here, we explored if and how parallel manipulations of formal prediction violations and temporal predictability affect SG in persons with and without tinnitus. Age-, education- and sex-matched persons with and without tinnitus (N = 52) participated and listened to paired-tone oddball sequences, varying in formal (standard vs. deviant pitch) and temporal predictability (isochronous vs. random timing). EEG was recorded from 128 channels and data were analyzed by means of temporal spatial principal component analysis (tsPCA). SG was assessed by amplitude suppression for the 2nd tone in a pair and was observed in P50-like activity in both timing conditions and groups. Correspondingly, deviants elicited overall larger amplitudes than standards. However, only persons without tinnitus displayed a larger N100-like deviance response in the isochronous compared to the random timing condition. This result might imply that persons with tinnitus do not benefit similarly as persons without tinnitus from temporal predictability in deviance processing. Thus, persons with tinnitus might display less temporal sensitivity in auditory processing than persons without tinnitus.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hearing Research
Hearing Research 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
163
审稿时长
75 days
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic peripheral and central auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental and clinical studies, but theoretical and methodological papers will also be considered. The journal publishes original research papers, review and mini- review articles, rapid communications, method/protocol and perspective articles. Papers submitted should deal with auditory anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, imaging, modeling and behavioural studies in animals and humans, as well as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Papers dealing with the vestibular system are also considered for publication. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will be accepted when they contribute to the understanding of normal and pathological hearing functions.
期刊最新文献
Cross-sectional screening for inflammation in tinnitus with near-normal hearing Frequency dependence and harmonic distortion of stapes displacement and intracochlear pressure in response to very high level sounds Auditory changes in awake guinea pigs exposed to overcompressed music Editorial Board Effects of ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral noise precursors on psychoacoustical tuning curves in humans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1