中央银行外汇干预的叙事方法?

IF 2.8 2区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of International Money and Finance Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2024.103129
Alain Naef
{"title":"中央银行外汇干预的叙事方法?","authors":"Alain Naef","doi":"10.1016/j.jimonfin.2024.103129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Most countries in the world use foreign exchange intervention, but measuring the success of the policy is difficult. By using a narrative approach, I identify interventions when the central bank manages to influence the exchange rate based on pure luck. I separate them from interventions when the central bank actually impacted the exchange rate. Because intervention records are daily aggregates, an intervention might appear to have changed the direction of the exchange rate, when it is more likely to have been caused by market news. This analysis allows to have a better understanding of how successful central bank operations really are. I use new daily data on Bank of England interventions in the 1980 s and 1990 s. Some studies find that interventions work in up to 80 % of cases. Yet, by accounting for intraday market moving news, I find in adverse conditions, the Bank of England managed to influence the exchange rate only in 8 % of cases. I use natural language processing to confirm the validity of the narrative approach. Using lasso and a VAR analysis, I investigate what makes the Bank of England intervene. I find that only movement on the Deutschmark and not US dollar exchange rate made the Bank intervene. Also, I find that interest rate hikes were mostly a tool for currency management and accompanied by large reserve sales.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48331,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Money and Finance","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 103129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261560624001165/pdfft?md5=3d2335fa61ec4f9fd3f903d2488570ff&pid=1-s2.0-S0261560624001165-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blowing against the Wind? a narrative approach to central Bank foreign exchange intervention\",\"authors\":\"Alain Naef\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jimonfin.2024.103129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Most countries in the world use foreign exchange intervention, but measuring the success of the policy is difficult. By using a narrative approach, I identify interventions when the central bank manages to influence the exchange rate based on pure luck. I separate them from interventions when the central bank actually impacted the exchange rate. Because intervention records are daily aggregates, an intervention might appear to have changed the direction of the exchange rate, when it is more likely to have been caused by market news. This analysis allows to have a better understanding of how successful central bank operations really are. I use new daily data on Bank of England interventions in the 1980 s and 1990 s. Some studies find that interventions work in up to 80 % of cases. Yet, by accounting for intraday market moving news, I find in adverse conditions, the Bank of England managed to influence the exchange rate only in 8 % of cases. I use natural language processing to confirm the validity of the narrative approach. Using lasso and a VAR analysis, I investigate what makes the Bank of England intervene. I find that only movement on the Deutschmark and not US dollar exchange rate made the Bank intervene. Also, I find that interest rate hikes were mostly a tool for currency management and accompanied by large reserve sales.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Money and Finance\",\"volume\":\"146 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261560624001165/pdfft?md5=3d2335fa61ec4f9fd3f903d2488570ff&pid=1-s2.0-S0261560624001165-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Money and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261560624001165\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Money and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261560624001165","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界上大多数国家都使用外汇干预,但衡量该政策的成功与否却很困难。通过使用叙述方法,我确定了中央银行纯粹靠运气设法影响汇率的干预措施。我将它们与中央银行实际影响汇率的干预区分开来。由于干预记录是每日总量,因此干预看似改变了汇率方向,但更有可能是由市场新闻引起的。通过这种分析,我们可以更好地了解中央银行的操作到底有多成功。我使用了英格兰银行在 20 世纪 80 年代和 90 年代进行干预的每日新数据。然而,考虑到当日市场动态新闻,我发现在不利条件下,英格兰银行仅在 8% 的情况下成功影响了汇率。我使用自然语言处理来证实叙述方法的有效性。利用套索和 VAR 分析,我研究了是什么促使英格兰银行进行干预。我发现,只有德国马克汇率而非美元汇率的变动才会促使英格兰银行进行干预。此外,我还发现加息主要是货币管理的一种工具,并伴随着大量的储备出售。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Blowing against the Wind? a narrative approach to central Bank foreign exchange intervention

Most countries in the world use foreign exchange intervention, but measuring the success of the policy is difficult. By using a narrative approach, I identify interventions when the central bank manages to influence the exchange rate based on pure luck. I separate them from interventions when the central bank actually impacted the exchange rate. Because intervention records are daily aggregates, an intervention might appear to have changed the direction of the exchange rate, when it is more likely to have been caused by market news. This analysis allows to have a better understanding of how successful central bank operations really are. I use new daily data on Bank of England interventions in the 1980 s and 1990 s. Some studies find that interventions work in up to 80 % of cases. Yet, by accounting for intraday market moving news, I find in adverse conditions, the Bank of England managed to influence the exchange rate only in 8 % of cases. I use natural language processing to confirm the validity of the narrative approach. Using lasso and a VAR analysis, I investigate what makes the Bank of England intervene. I find that only movement on the Deutschmark and not US dollar exchange rate made the Bank intervene. Also, I find that interest rate hikes were mostly a tool for currency management and accompanied by large reserve sales.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
141
期刊介绍: Since its launch in 1982, Journal of International Money and Finance has built up a solid reputation as a high quality scholarly journal devoted to theoretical and empirical research in the fields of international monetary economics, international finance, and the rapidly developing overlap area between the two. Researchers in these areas, and financial market professionals too, pay attention to the articles that the journal publishes. Authors published in the journal are in the forefront of scholarly research on exchange rate behaviour, foreign exchange options, international capital markets, international monetary and fiscal policy, international transmission and related questions.
期刊最新文献
A post-pandemic new normal for interest rates in emerging bond markets? Evidence from Chile Spillovers between cryptocurrencies and financial markets in a global framework How U.S. tariffs impact China’s domestic sourcing: Evidence from firm-to-firm transactions Trade circumvention in free trade areas Innovation’s false spring: U.S. export controls and Chinese patent quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1