{"title":"糖尿病对导管消融术后心房颤动复发和主要心脑血管不良事件的影响","authors":"Mingjie Lin, Juntao Wang, Bing Rong, Kai Zhang, Tongshuai Chen, Wenqiang Han, Tong Hu, Tianyu Wang, Haonan Deng, Jingquan Zhong, Lin Wu","doi":"10.1155/2024/1087623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Introduction</i>. Further evidence is required to understand the impact of preexisting and newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus (DM) on atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) following catheter ablation. <i>Materials and Methods</i>. Data from 1,685 patients (1,406 without DM vs. 279 with DM) who underwent AF catheter ablation between 2015 and 2019 were analyzed. These participants were prospectively monitored for incidents of AF recurrence and MACCE over an average period of 58.1 months. <i>Results</i>. A higher incidence of AF recurrence (24.6% vs. 34.4%) and a greater frequency of MACCE (6.5% vs. 9.3%) were observed among DM patients. Kaplan–Meier curves indicated that DM significantly increased the rates of AF recurrence, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.506 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.165–1.948 (<i>p</i> = 0.0003). This association persisted in the propensity-matched cohort. DM was independently predictive of AF recurrence after adjusting for potential risks using Cox regression analysis. Notably, new-onset DM was also found to be an independent predictor of AF recurrence. Similarly, DM was an independent risk of MACCE (HR [95% CI], 2.273 [1.120–4.615], <i>p</i> = 0.023). <i>Conclusions</i>. Both existing DM and newly diagnosed DM were identified as independent risk factors for AF recurrence following ablation; they also significantly impacted MACCE outcomes. This study underscores the urgent need for careful management of DM among individuals undergoing AF ablation in order to reduce the likelihood of arrhythmic relapse. This analysis utilized data from a prospective observational study registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on July 20, 2014 (ChiCTR-OCH-14004674).</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/1087623","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence and Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events following Catheter Ablation\",\"authors\":\"Mingjie Lin, Juntao Wang, Bing Rong, Kai Zhang, Tongshuai Chen, Wenqiang Han, Tong Hu, Tianyu Wang, Haonan Deng, Jingquan Zhong, Lin Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/1087623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><i>Introduction</i>. Further evidence is required to understand the impact of preexisting and newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus (DM) on atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) following catheter ablation. <i>Materials and Methods</i>. Data from 1,685 patients (1,406 without DM vs. 279 with DM) who underwent AF catheter ablation between 2015 and 2019 were analyzed. These participants were prospectively monitored for incidents of AF recurrence and MACCE over an average period of 58.1 months. <i>Results</i>. A higher incidence of AF recurrence (24.6% vs. 34.4%) and a greater frequency of MACCE (6.5% vs. 9.3%) were observed among DM patients. Kaplan–Meier curves indicated that DM significantly increased the rates of AF recurrence, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.506 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.165–1.948 (<i>p</i> = 0.0003). This association persisted in the propensity-matched cohort. DM was independently predictive of AF recurrence after adjusting for potential risks using Cox regression analysis. Notably, new-onset DM was also found to be an independent predictor of AF recurrence. Similarly, DM was an independent risk of MACCE (HR [95% CI], 2.273 [1.120–4.615], <i>p</i> = 0.023). <i>Conclusions</i>. Both existing DM and newly diagnosed DM were identified as independent risk factors for AF recurrence following ablation; they also significantly impacted MACCE outcomes. This study underscores the urgent need for careful management of DM among individuals undergoing AF ablation in order to reduce the likelihood of arrhythmic relapse. This analysis utilized data from a prospective observational study registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on July 20, 2014 (ChiCTR-OCH-14004674).</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/1087623\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/1087623\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/1087623","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence and Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events following Catheter Ablation
Introduction. Further evidence is required to understand the impact of preexisting and newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus (DM) on atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) following catheter ablation. Materials and Methods. Data from 1,685 patients (1,406 without DM vs. 279 with DM) who underwent AF catheter ablation between 2015 and 2019 were analyzed. These participants were prospectively monitored for incidents of AF recurrence and MACCE over an average period of 58.1 months. Results. A higher incidence of AF recurrence (24.6% vs. 34.4%) and a greater frequency of MACCE (6.5% vs. 9.3%) were observed among DM patients. Kaplan–Meier curves indicated that DM significantly increased the rates of AF recurrence, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.506 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.165–1.948 (p = 0.0003). This association persisted in the propensity-matched cohort. DM was independently predictive of AF recurrence after adjusting for potential risks using Cox regression analysis. Notably, new-onset DM was also found to be an independent predictor of AF recurrence. Similarly, DM was an independent risk of MACCE (HR [95% CI], 2.273 [1.120–4.615], p = 0.023). Conclusions. Both existing DM and newly diagnosed DM were identified as independent risk factors for AF recurrence following ablation; they also significantly impacted MACCE outcomes. This study underscores the urgent need for careful management of DM among individuals undergoing AF ablation in order to reduce the likelihood of arrhythmic relapse. This analysis utilized data from a prospective observational study registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on July 20, 2014 (ChiCTR-OCH-14004674).
期刊介绍:
IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal.
IJCP publishes:
Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed]
Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
International scope
IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.