加拿大护士启动镇痛协议以减少急诊科的延误:质量改进研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING International Emergency Nursing Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI:10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101488
Julia Calder , Richard Wanbon , James Thompson , Paul Colella , Jason Wale , Sara Cassidy , Sandra McLeod , Rebecca Kirkwood
{"title":"加拿大护士启动镇痛协议以减少急诊科的延误:质量改进研究。","authors":"Julia Calder ,&nbsp;Richard Wanbon ,&nbsp;James Thompson ,&nbsp;Paul Colella ,&nbsp;Jason Wale ,&nbsp;Sara Cassidy ,&nbsp;Sandra McLeod ,&nbsp;Rebecca Kirkwood","doi":"10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Australian literature supports nurse-initiated opioid analgesia protocols may be effective, but this practice is not yet widely adopted in Canada.</p></div><div><h3>Local problem</h3><p>Previous quality audits of Emergency Departments (EDs) in Victoria (Canada) indicate long delays to administration of analgesia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two tertiary care hospitals in a Canadian city of approximately 400,000 people were chosen for a quality improvement initiative. A manual retrospective chart review was conducted on a total of 122 patients which was compared to data from 125 patients from a previous audit in 2019.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>ED nursing staff both hospitals were provided education and daily reminders to document pain score at triage, and to flag an acute analgesia opioid order set on the charts of patients with moderate or severe pain (greater than 4 out of 10 in the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) or by triage nurse’s clinical judgment). At Victoria General Hospital (VGH), nurses had the option of finding an emergency physician (EP) to sign the acute analgesia opioid order set, or independently administer IV opioids from a presigned order set without consulting an EP. At Royal Jubilee Hospital (RJH), nursing staff could only administer IV opioids from the order set after an EP was consulted. Median time to opioid analgesia after the intervention was compared to 2019 data for each hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Each hospital significantly reduced median time to administration of opioids: VGH achieved 45.6 % reduction (1 h 8 min improvement, p = 0.001) and RJH achieved a 62.5 % reduction (2 h 11 min improvement, p &lt; 0.001). Secondary outcomes indicated patients may receive analgesia faster when the opioid protocol was nurse initiated (median 43 minutes) vs physician initiated (median 1 h 1 min) at VGH. Pain score documentation at triage improved from &lt;10 % in 2019 to &gt;50 % in 2020 at both sites. Approximately 95 % of EP and nursing staff thought nurse-initiated opioids are safe, effective, and should be supported by regulatory boards.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Implementing a new triage protocol to expedite initiation of an analgesic protocol was associated with significantly reduced time to analgesia for patients with moderate to severe pain. Time reductions may be greater with nurse-initiated analgesia before physician assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48914,"journal":{"name":"International Emergency Nursing","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101488"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Canadian nurse initiated analgesia protocol to reduce delays in the emergency department: A quality improvement study\",\"authors\":\"Julia Calder ,&nbsp;Richard Wanbon ,&nbsp;James Thompson ,&nbsp;Paul Colella ,&nbsp;Jason Wale ,&nbsp;Sara Cassidy ,&nbsp;Sandra McLeod ,&nbsp;Rebecca Kirkwood\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Australian literature supports nurse-initiated opioid analgesia protocols may be effective, but this practice is not yet widely adopted in Canada.</p></div><div><h3>Local problem</h3><p>Previous quality audits of Emergency Departments (EDs) in Victoria (Canada) indicate long delays to administration of analgesia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two tertiary care hospitals in a Canadian city of approximately 400,000 people were chosen for a quality improvement initiative. A manual retrospective chart review was conducted on a total of 122 patients which was compared to data from 125 patients from a previous audit in 2019.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>ED nursing staff both hospitals were provided education and daily reminders to document pain score at triage, and to flag an acute analgesia opioid order set on the charts of patients with moderate or severe pain (greater than 4 out of 10 in the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) or by triage nurse’s clinical judgment). At Victoria General Hospital (VGH), nurses had the option of finding an emergency physician (EP) to sign the acute analgesia opioid order set, or independently administer IV opioids from a presigned order set without consulting an EP. At Royal Jubilee Hospital (RJH), nursing staff could only administer IV opioids from the order set after an EP was consulted. Median time to opioid analgesia after the intervention was compared to 2019 data for each hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Each hospital significantly reduced median time to administration of opioids: VGH achieved 45.6 % reduction (1 h 8 min improvement, p = 0.001) and RJH achieved a 62.5 % reduction (2 h 11 min improvement, p &lt; 0.001). Secondary outcomes indicated patients may receive analgesia faster when the opioid protocol was nurse initiated (median 43 minutes) vs physician initiated (median 1 h 1 min) at VGH. Pain score documentation at triage improved from &lt;10 % in 2019 to &gt;50 % in 2020 at both sites. Approximately 95 % of EP and nursing staff thought nurse-initiated opioids are safe, effective, and should be supported by regulatory boards.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Implementing a new triage protocol to expedite initiation of an analgesic protocol was associated with significantly reduced time to analgesia for patients with moderate to severe pain. Time reductions may be greater with nurse-initiated analgesia before physician assessment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Emergency Nursing\",\"volume\":\"75 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101488\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Emergency Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X24000831\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X24000831","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:当地问题:之前对加拿大维多利亚州急诊科(ED)进行的质量审核显示,镇痛用药延迟时间较长:方法:在一个人口约 40 万的加拿大城市中,选择了两家三级医院开展质量改进活动。对总共 122 名患者进行了人工回顾性病历审查,并与 2019 年之前审计的 125 名患者的数据进行了比较:两家医院的急诊室护理人员都接受了教育,并每天提醒他们在分诊时记录疼痛评分,并在中度或重度疼痛患者的病历上标注急性镇痛阿片类药物医嘱(数字评分量表(NRS)满分大于4分,或由分诊护士临床判断)。在维多利亚综合医院(VGH),护士可以选择找急诊医生(EP)在急性镇痛阿片类药物医嘱单上签字,也可以在不咨询急诊医生的情况下,根据预先签署的医嘱单独立使用静脉注射阿片类药物。在皇家朱比利医院(Royal Jubilee Hospital,RJH),护理人员只有在咨询过急诊科医生后才能根据医嘱单使用静脉注射阿片类药物。将干预后阿片类镇痛的中位时间与各医院2019年的数据进行了比较:每家医院都大幅缩短了阿片类药物用药的中位时间:VGH缩短了45.6%(缩短了1小时8分钟,p = 0.001),RJH缩短了62.5%(缩短了2小时11分钟,p 50%)。约 95% 的 EP 和护理人员认为护士发起的阿片类药物治疗是安全、有效的,应得到监管委员会的支持:结论:实施新的分诊方案以加快镇痛方案的启动与显著缩短中度至重度疼痛患者的镇痛时间有关。在医生进行评估之前,由护士启动镇痛方案可能会缩短更多时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Canadian nurse initiated analgesia protocol to reduce delays in the emergency department: A quality improvement study

Background

Australian literature supports nurse-initiated opioid analgesia protocols may be effective, but this practice is not yet widely adopted in Canada.

Local problem

Previous quality audits of Emergency Departments (EDs) in Victoria (Canada) indicate long delays to administration of analgesia.

Methods

Two tertiary care hospitals in a Canadian city of approximately 400,000 people were chosen for a quality improvement initiative. A manual retrospective chart review was conducted on a total of 122 patients which was compared to data from 125 patients from a previous audit in 2019.

Interventions

ED nursing staff both hospitals were provided education and daily reminders to document pain score at triage, and to flag an acute analgesia opioid order set on the charts of patients with moderate or severe pain (greater than 4 out of 10 in the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) or by triage nurse’s clinical judgment). At Victoria General Hospital (VGH), nurses had the option of finding an emergency physician (EP) to sign the acute analgesia opioid order set, or independently administer IV opioids from a presigned order set without consulting an EP. At Royal Jubilee Hospital (RJH), nursing staff could only administer IV opioids from the order set after an EP was consulted. Median time to opioid analgesia after the intervention was compared to 2019 data for each hospital.

Results

Each hospital significantly reduced median time to administration of opioids: VGH achieved 45.6 % reduction (1 h 8 min improvement, p = 0.001) and RJH achieved a 62.5 % reduction (2 h 11 min improvement, p < 0.001). Secondary outcomes indicated patients may receive analgesia faster when the opioid protocol was nurse initiated (median 43 minutes) vs physician initiated (median 1 h 1 min) at VGH. Pain score documentation at triage improved from <10 % in 2019 to >50 % in 2020 at both sites. Approximately 95 % of EP and nursing staff thought nurse-initiated opioids are safe, effective, and should be supported by regulatory boards.

Conclusion

Implementing a new triage protocol to expedite initiation of an analgesic protocol was associated with significantly reduced time to analgesia for patients with moderate to severe pain. Time reductions may be greater with nurse-initiated analgesia before physician assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: International Emergency Nursing is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to nurses and other professionals involved in emergency care. It aims to promote excellence through dissemination of high quality research findings, specialist knowledge and discussion of professional issues that reflect the diversity of this field. With an international readership and authorship, it provides a platform for practitioners worldwide to communicate and enhance the evidence-base of emergency care. The journal publishes a broad range of papers, from personal reflection to primary research findings, created by first-time through to reputable authors from a number of disciplines. It brings together research from practice, education, theory, and operational management, relevant to all levels of staff working in emergency care settings worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Developing a trauma-informed care graphic narrative educational tool for emergency trauma nurses Relationship between compassion fatigue, conscience stress, and perceived quality of care in emergency nurses Effectiveness of a training program for emergency nurses on pelvic binder application and patient care: A single-group pretest–posttest study Determination of the relationship between competencies in disaster nursing management and perceived stress: The intermediary role of resilience Emergency medical service nurses’ experiences and perspectives on a protocol change of pre-hospital preventive immobilization of spinal injuries after trauma: A qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1