老年综合评估指导护理与常规护理对老年癌症患者健康相关生活质量的影响:随机试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Critical reviews in oncology/hematology Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104442
{"title":"老年综合评估指导护理与常规护理对老年癌症患者健康相关生活质量的影响:随机试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To evaluate if comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA)-guided care improves health-related quality of life (HRQL) in older adults with cancer compared to usual care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified through biomedical databases. Meta-analyses using DerSimonian-Laird model summarized the difference in the mean change of HRQL scores from baseline across various time points, with evidence certainty assessed by the GRADE tool. Logistic regression via generalized estimating equations analyzed predictors of HRQL improvement.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Potential improvement in the global HRQL score by CGA-guided care at 3 months (Cohen’s d 0.27, 95 % CI −0.03–0.58, moderate certainty), could not be excluded. Larger RCTs or those mandating CGA before initiating anti-cancer treatment were predictors of improved HRQL.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The effects of CGA-guided care on HRQL were variable. Larger RCTs and those mandating pre-treatment CGA tended to report improved HRQL.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health-related quality of life with comprehensive geriatric assessment guided care versus usual care in older adults with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To evaluate if comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA)-guided care improves health-related quality of life (HRQL) in older adults with cancer compared to usual care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified through biomedical databases. Meta-analyses using DerSimonian-Laird model summarized the difference in the mean change of HRQL scores from baseline across various time points, with evidence certainty assessed by the GRADE tool. Logistic regression via generalized estimating equations analyzed predictors of HRQL improvement.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Potential improvement in the global HRQL score by CGA-guided care at 3 months (Cohen’s d 0.27, 95 % CI −0.03–0.58, moderate certainty), could not be excluded. Larger RCTs or those mandating CGA before initiating anti-cancer treatment were predictors of improved HRQL.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The effects of CGA-guided care on HRQL were variable. Larger RCTs and those mandating pre-treatment CGA tended to report improved HRQL.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842824001859\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842824001859","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:评估老年病综合评估(CGA)指导下的护理是否能改善癌症老年人的健康相关生活质量:目的:评估与常规护理相比,老年医学综合评估(CGA)指导下的护理是否能改善癌症老年人的健康相关生活质量(HRQL):方法:通过生物医学数据库确定相关的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用 DerSimonian-Laird 模型进行元分析,总结不同时间点 HRQL 评分与基线相比的平均变化差异,并使用 GRADE 工具评估证据的确定性。通过广义估计方程的逻辑回归分析了HRQL改善的预测因素:不排除在 3 个月时,CGA 指导下的护理可改善总体 HRQL 评分(Cohen's d 0.27,95% CI -0.03 至 0.58,中等确定性)。较大的RCT或在开始抗癌治疗前强制进行CGA的RCT是HRQL改善的预测因素:结论:CGA指导下的治疗对HRQL的影响各不相同。结论:CGA指导护理对HRQL的影响不尽相同,规模较大的RCT研究和规定在治疗前进行CGA的研究往往报告HRQL有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health-related quality of life with comprehensive geriatric assessment guided care versus usual care in older adults with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Background

To evaluate if comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA)-guided care improves health-related quality of life (HRQL) in older adults with cancer compared to usual care.

Methods

Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified through biomedical databases. Meta-analyses using DerSimonian-Laird model summarized the difference in the mean change of HRQL scores from baseline across various time points, with evidence certainty assessed by the GRADE tool. Logistic regression via generalized estimating equations analyzed predictors of HRQL improvement.

Results

Potential improvement in the global HRQL score by CGA-guided care at 3 months (Cohen’s d 0.27, 95 % CI −0.03–0.58, moderate certainty), could not be excluded. Larger RCTs or those mandating CGA before initiating anti-cancer treatment were predictors of improved HRQL.

Conclusion

The effects of CGA-guided care on HRQL were variable. Larger RCTs and those mandating pre-treatment CGA tended to report improved HRQL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
213
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology publishes scholarly, critical reviews in all fields of oncology and hematology written by experts from around the world. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology is the Official Journal of the European School of Oncology (ESO) and the International Society of Liquid Biopsy.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Targeted Therapy with Polymeric Nanoparticles in PBRM1-Mutant Biliary Tract Cancers: Harnessing DNA Damage Repair Mechanisms. The Potential of Circulating Cell-Free RNA in CNS Tumor Diagnosis and Monitoring: A Liquid Biopsy Approach. PROTON THERAPY FOR ADULT-TYPE DIFFUSE GLIOMA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1