Alejandro Sánchez-Gómez , Christoph Schürz , Eugenio Molina-Navarro , Katrin Bieger
{"title":"SWAT+ 中的地下水建模:现实基流模拟的注意事项","authors":"Alejandro Sánchez-Gómez , Christoph Schürz , Eugenio Molina-Navarro , Katrin Bieger","doi":"10.1016/j.gsd.2024.101275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hydrological models are valuable tools that support the evaluation and management of water resources. Among catchment scale models, SWAT has been widely used, and a revision of this model, SWAT+, was recently released. Groundwater simulation has been pointed out as one of the main weaknesses of these models, and despite the introduction of some improvements in the new version, an accurate simulation of groundwater flow is still a pending task. One of the most common issues is the inability of the model to maintain baseflow during long dry periods. Baseflow is common in aquifer areas and has great relevance for water quality and ecosystems. Although some authors proposed different solutions to its inaccurate simulation (e.g., editing aquifers configuration, coupling with other models, etc.) this work aimed to determine if a realistic groundwater simulation is possible using SWAT+ and determine the reasons why this is not being achieved. For this purpose, a groundwater dominated catchment was modelled, and different calibration approaches were carried out and compared, including strategies such as hard calibration, soft calibration, or sensitivity analysis. A comprehensive analysis of model outputs was crucial to achieve a model with a realistic simulation of groundwater contribution to the streamflow, both in amount and timing. The properly parameterization of some parameters (<em>perco</em>, <em>latq_co</em>, <em>lat_ttime</em>, and especially <em>alpha</em>) was key. Limitations of hard calibration were evidenced, such as the necessity of complementing this strategy with an evaluation of the simulation of hydrological processes. For those parameters governing streamflow components simulation, a detailed description of its functioning is included in this manuscript, together with some guidelines to achieve a statistically accurate model with a realistic groundwater flow simulation. Follow these recommendations will be useful for SWAT users, and will serve to create more reliable models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37879,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater for Sustainable Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352801X2400198X/pdfft?md5=b201dd64d1acb5b580ac1bd76a8211f4&pid=1-s2.0-S2352801X2400198X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Groundwater modelling in SWAT+: Considerations for a realistic baseflow simulation\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro Sánchez-Gómez , Christoph Schürz , Eugenio Molina-Navarro , Katrin Bieger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gsd.2024.101275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Hydrological models are valuable tools that support the evaluation and management of water resources. Among catchment scale models, SWAT has been widely used, and a revision of this model, SWAT+, was recently released. Groundwater simulation has been pointed out as one of the main weaknesses of these models, and despite the introduction of some improvements in the new version, an accurate simulation of groundwater flow is still a pending task. One of the most common issues is the inability of the model to maintain baseflow during long dry periods. Baseflow is common in aquifer areas and has great relevance for water quality and ecosystems. Although some authors proposed different solutions to its inaccurate simulation (e.g., editing aquifers configuration, coupling with other models, etc.) this work aimed to determine if a realistic groundwater simulation is possible using SWAT+ and determine the reasons why this is not being achieved. For this purpose, a groundwater dominated catchment was modelled, and different calibration approaches were carried out and compared, including strategies such as hard calibration, soft calibration, or sensitivity analysis. A comprehensive analysis of model outputs was crucial to achieve a model with a realistic simulation of groundwater contribution to the streamflow, both in amount and timing. The properly parameterization of some parameters (<em>perco</em>, <em>latq_co</em>, <em>lat_ttime</em>, and especially <em>alpha</em>) was key. Limitations of hard calibration were evidenced, such as the necessity of complementing this strategy with an evaluation of the simulation of hydrological processes. For those parameters governing streamflow components simulation, a detailed description of its functioning is included in this manuscript, together with some guidelines to achieve a statistically accurate model with a realistic groundwater flow simulation. Follow these recommendations will be useful for SWAT users, and will serve to create more reliable models.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Groundwater for Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352801X2400198X/pdfft?md5=b201dd64d1acb5b580ac1bd76a8211f4&pid=1-s2.0-S2352801X2400198X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Groundwater for Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352801X2400198X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Groundwater for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352801X2400198X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Groundwater modelling in SWAT+: Considerations for a realistic baseflow simulation
Hydrological models are valuable tools that support the evaluation and management of water resources. Among catchment scale models, SWAT has been widely used, and a revision of this model, SWAT+, was recently released. Groundwater simulation has been pointed out as one of the main weaknesses of these models, and despite the introduction of some improvements in the new version, an accurate simulation of groundwater flow is still a pending task. One of the most common issues is the inability of the model to maintain baseflow during long dry periods. Baseflow is common in aquifer areas and has great relevance for water quality and ecosystems. Although some authors proposed different solutions to its inaccurate simulation (e.g., editing aquifers configuration, coupling with other models, etc.) this work aimed to determine if a realistic groundwater simulation is possible using SWAT+ and determine the reasons why this is not being achieved. For this purpose, a groundwater dominated catchment was modelled, and different calibration approaches were carried out and compared, including strategies such as hard calibration, soft calibration, or sensitivity analysis. A comprehensive analysis of model outputs was crucial to achieve a model with a realistic simulation of groundwater contribution to the streamflow, both in amount and timing. The properly parameterization of some parameters (perco, latq_co, lat_ttime, and especially alpha) was key. Limitations of hard calibration were evidenced, such as the necessity of complementing this strategy with an evaluation of the simulation of hydrological processes. For those parameters governing streamflow components simulation, a detailed description of its functioning is included in this manuscript, together with some guidelines to achieve a statistically accurate model with a realistic groundwater flow simulation. Follow these recommendations will be useful for SWAT users, and will serve to create more reliable models.
期刊介绍:
Groundwater for Sustainable Development is directed to different stakeholders and professionals, including government and non-governmental organizations, international funding agencies, universities, public water institutions, public health and other public/private sector professionals, and other relevant institutions. It is aimed at professionals, academics and students in the fields of disciplines such as: groundwater and its connection to surface hydrology and environment, soil sciences, engineering, ecology, microbiology, atmospheric sciences, analytical chemistry, hydro-engineering, water technology, environmental ethics, economics, public health, policy, as well as social sciences, legal disciplines, or any other area connected with water issues. The objectives of this journal are to facilitate: • The improvement of effective and sustainable management of water resources across the globe. • The improvement of human access to groundwater resources in adequate quantity and good quality. • The meeting of the increasing demand for drinking and irrigation water needed for food security to contribute to a social and economically sound human development. • The creation of a global inter- and multidisciplinary platform and forum to improve our understanding of groundwater resources and to advocate their effective and sustainable management and protection against contamination. • Interdisciplinary information exchange and to stimulate scientific research in the fields of groundwater related sciences and social and health sciences required to achieve the United Nations Millennium Development Goals for sustainable development.