在 COVID-19 大流行期间,人与人之间的社交互动和虚拟社交互动提高了人们的幸福感

IF 4.9 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in human behavior reports Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100455
Nathan Liang , Samantha J. Grayson , Mia A. Kussman, Judith N. Mildner , Diana I. Tamir
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间,人与人之间的社交互动和虚拟社交互动提高了人们的幸福感","authors":"Nathan Liang ,&nbsp;Samantha J. Grayson ,&nbsp;Mia A. Kussman,&nbsp;Judith N. Mildner ,&nbsp;Diana I. Tamir","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social interactions abound in everyday life. Face-to-face interactions, in particular, catalyze the social connection necessary for psychological well-being. What happens, then, when a global pandemic disrupts normal patterns of socialization? In March 2020, the world uploaded much of its face-to-face interactions online, transitioning en masse to remote work. These circumstances provided a natural experiment for studying how virtual versus face-to-face interactions facilitate psychosocial well-being. We conducted two studies measuring how eight types of interactions related to people's positive affect and social connection. Study 1 tracked virtual interactions and well-being (<em>n</em> = 996) in three waves from May 2020–2021. Study 2 measured participants' (<em>n</em> = 249) virtual interactions and well-being three times daily for two weeks. Both studies indicate that voice calling, group calling, and online messaging are associated with increased social connection and positive affect in the short- and long-term. However, the benefits of face-to-face interactions consistently eclipsed those of all virtual surrogates under investigation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100455"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958824000885/pdfft?md5=010763ae053007f682389afa6f5e8fe6&pid=1-s2.0-S2451958824000885-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-person and virtual social interactions improve well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Nathan Liang ,&nbsp;Samantha J. Grayson ,&nbsp;Mia A. Kussman,&nbsp;Judith N. Mildner ,&nbsp;Diana I. Tamir\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Social interactions abound in everyday life. Face-to-face interactions, in particular, catalyze the social connection necessary for psychological well-being. What happens, then, when a global pandemic disrupts normal patterns of socialization? In March 2020, the world uploaded much of its face-to-face interactions online, transitioning en masse to remote work. These circumstances provided a natural experiment for studying how virtual versus face-to-face interactions facilitate psychosocial well-being. We conducted two studies measuring how eight types of interactions related to people's positive affect and social connection. Study 1 tracked virtual interactions and well-being (<em>n</em> = 996) in three waves from May 2020–2021. Study 2 measured participants' (<em>n</em> = 249) virtual interactions and well-being three times daily for two weeks. Both studies indicate that voice calling, group calling, and online messaging are associated with increased social connection and positive affect in the short- and long-term. However, the benefits of face-to-face interactions consistently eclipsed those of all virtual surrogates under investigation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in human behavior reports\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100455\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958824000885/pdfft?md5=010763ae053007f682389afa6f5e8fe6&pid=1-s2.0-S2451958824000885-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in human behavior reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958824000885\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958824000885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在日常生活中,社交互动比比皆是。尤其是面对面的互动,能促进心理健康所需的社会联系。那么,如果一场全球性流行病破坏了正常的社交模式,会发生什么呢?2020 年 3 月,全世界将大部分面对面的互动都上传到了网络上,并大规模过渡到远程工作。这些情况为研究虚拟互动与面对面互动如何促进社会心理健康提供了一个自然的实验。我们进行了两项研究,测量八种类型的互动如何与人们的积极情感和社会联系相关联。研究 1 在 2020 年 5 月至 2021 年 5 月的三个波次中跟踪了虚拟互动和幸福感(n = 996)。研究 2 对参与者(n = 249)的虚拟互动和幸福感进行了为期两周、每天三次的测量。这两项研究都表明,语音通话、群组通话和在线信息在短期和长期内都会增加社会联系和积极情绪。然而,面对面互动的益处始终超过了所有虚拟代用的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In-person and virtual social interactions improve well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic

Social interactions abound in everyday life. Face-to-face interactions, in particular, catalyze the social connection necessary for psychological well-being. What happens, then, when a global pandemic disrupts normal patterns of socialization? In March 2020, the world uploaded much of its face-to-face interactions online, transitioning en masse to remote work. These circumstances provided a natural experiment for studying how virtual versus face-to-face interactions facilitate psychosocial well-being. We conducted two studies measuring how eight types of interactions related to people's positive affect and social connection. Study 1 tracked virtual interactions and well-being (n = 996) in three waves from May 2020–2021. Study 2 measured participants' (n = 249) virtual interactions and well-being three times daily for two weeks. Both studies indicate that voice calling, group calling, and online messaging are associated with increased social connection and positive affect in the short- and long-term. However, the benefits of face-to-face interactions consistently eclipsed those of all virtual surrogates under investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Designing adaptive learning environments for continuing education: Stakeholders’ perspectives on indicators and interventions Longitudinal bidirectional relation between fear of missing out and risky loot box consumption: Evidence for FoMO-Driven loot boxes spiral hypothesis The thrill of chance: Psychophysiological responses in loot boxes and simulated slot machines Friendship or feedback? – Relations between computer science students’ goals, technology acceptance, use of an online peer feedback tool, and learning Human performance in detecting deepfakes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 56 papers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1