宗教信号与亲社会性:文献综述

IF 3 1区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Evolution and Human Behavior Pub Date : 2024-07-13 DOI:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.06.002
Stefanie B. Northover , Tadeg Quillien , Daniel Conroy-Beam , Adam B. Cohen
{"title":"宗教信号与亲社会性:文献综述","authors":"Stefanie B. Northover ,&nbsp;Tadeg Quillien ,&nbsp;Daniel Conroy-Beam ,&nbsp;Adam B. Cohen","doi":"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The costly signaling theory of religion states that costly religious behaviors, badges, and bans (“religious practice” for short) are signals of commitment to the ingroup and its moral code. Such signals are proposed to increase cooperation. Here we review the empirical literature, which suggests that religious actors are often perceived as especially trustworthy and may be more likely recipients of help and cooperation. The evidence does not present a clear picture regarding the actual trustworthiness nor prosocial tendencies of religious actors<em>.</em> Limited available evidence suggests that routine forms of religious behavior are associated with ingroup favoritism. High-cost, infrequent, highly social forms of religious practice are associated with an increase in religious identity, but also an expanded social identity and greater tolerance for outgroup members. Following the literature review, we provide a discussion of proposed future research directions pertaining to the costs and benefits of religious practice, moderators, secular versus religious practice, and mediation of the relationship between observed religious practice and perceptions of religious actors' trustworthiness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55159,"journal":{"name":"Evolution and Human Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Religious signaling and prosociality: A review of the literature\",\"authors\":\"Stefanie B. Northover ,&nbsp;Tadeg Quillien ,&nbsp;Daniel Conroy-Beam ,&nbsp;Adam B. Cohen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.06.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The costly signaling theory of religion states that costly religious behaviors, badges, and bans (“religious practice” for short) are signals of commitment to the ingroup and its moral code. Such signals are proposed to increase cooperation. Here we review the empirical literature, which suggests that religious actors are often perceived as especially trustworthy and may be more likely recipients of help and cooperation. The evidence does not present a clear picture regarding the actual trustworthiness nor prosocial tendencies of religious actors<em>.</em> Limited available evidence suggests that routine forms of religious behavior are associated with ingroup favoritism. High-cost, infrequent, highly social forms of religious practice are associated with an increase in religious identity, but also an expanded social identity and greater tolerance for outgroup members. Following the literature review, we provide a discussion of proposed future research directions pertaining to the costs and benefits of religious practice, moderators, secular versus religious practice, and mediation of the relationship between observed religious practice and perceptions of religious actors' trustworthiness.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolution and Human Behavior\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolution and Human Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513824000692\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution and Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513824000692","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

宗教的代价信号理论认为,代价高昂的宗教行为、徽章和禁令(简称 "宗教实践")是对内聚群体及其道德准则做出承诺的信号。这种信号被认为可以增加合作。在此,我们回顾了实证文献,这些文献表明,宗教行为者通常被认为特别值得信赖,可能更容易获得帮助与合作。关于宗教行为者的实际可信度或亲社会倾向,证据并没有给出清晰的描述。有限的现有证据表明,常规形式的宗教行为与内群体偏袒有关。高成本、非经常性、高度社会化的宗教活动形式与宗教认同感的增强有关,但也与社会认同感的扩大和对外群体成员的更大容忍度有关。在文献综述之后,我们就宗教实践的成本与收益、调节因素、世俗实践与宗教实践、观察到的宗教实践与对宗教行为者可信度认知之间关系的调解等方面的未来研究方向进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Religious signaling and prosociality: A review of the literature

The costly signaling theory of religion states that costly religious behaviors, badges, and bans (“religious practice” for short) are signals of commitment to the ingroup and its moral code. Such signals are proposed to increase cooperation. Here we review the empirical literature, which suggests that religious actors are often perceived as especially trustworthy and may be more likely recipients of help and cooperation. The evidence does not present a clear picture regarding the actual trustworthiness nor prosocial tendencies of religious actors. Limited available evidence suggests that routine forms of religious behavior are associated with ingroup favoritism. High-cost, infrequent, highly social forms of religious practice are associated with an increase in religious identity, but also an expanded social identity and greater tolerance for outgroup members. Following the literature review, we provide a discussion of proposed future research directions pertaining to the costs and benefits of religious practice, moderators, secular versus religious practice, and mediation of the relationship between observed religious practice and perceptions of religious actors' trustworthiness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evolution and Human Behavior
Evolution and Human Behavior 生物-行为科学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
62
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Evolution and Human Behavior is an interdisciplinary journal, presenting research reports and theory in which evolutionary perspectives are brought to bear on the study of human behavior. It is primarily a scientific journal, but submissions from scholars in the humanities are also encouraged. Papers reporting on theoretical and empirical work on other species will be welcome if their relevance to the human animal is apparent.
期刊最新文献
Can race be replaced? Ecology and race categorization The evolution of between-sex bonds in primates Sex and cross-cultural comparison of self-enhancement practices: Data from four distinct societies The controversial origins of war and peace: apes, foragers, and human evolution Disqualifiers or preferences? How humans incorporate dealbreakers into mate choice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1