网络如何解决自然解决方案的障碍?荷兰农业和建筑业案例

IF 7.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Landscape and Urban Planning Pub Date : 2024-07-13 DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105147
Maryse M.H. Chappin , Maarten J. Punt , Helen S. Toxopeus , Nina van Tilburg , Cathy L. de Jongh , Hens A.C. Runhaar , Godelieve H.J. Spaas
{"title":"网络如何解决自然解决方案的障碍?荷兰农业和建筑业案例","authors":"Maryse M.H. Chappin ,&nbsp;Maarten J. Punt ,&nbsp;Helen S. Toxopeus ,&nbsp;Nina van Tilburg ,&nbsp;Cathy L. de Jongh ,&nbsp;Hens A.C. Runhaar ,&nbsp;Godelieve H.J. Spaas","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Nature-based solutions (NBS) can play a critical role in sustainability transitions in both urban and rural areas, but their uptake is hindered by a wide variety of barriers. While networks have been identified as a support structure for mainstreaming NBS, it is unclear what specific roles networks play in addressing the multiple barriers that NBS mainstreaming faces. Through qualitative research using focus group meetings and semi-structured interviews within two sectors in the Netherlands where attempts towards a nature-based transition are observed – i.e., agriculture and construction – we identify seven different functions through which networks address six specific barrier categories. We find <em>broad</em> network functions (e.g., knowledge sharing) that address multiple types of barriers simultaneously and <em>targeted</em> network functions (e.g., lobbying towards policy makers) aimed at alleviating one specific type of barrier. We also document that networks leave certain barriers unaddressed, such as technological and political barriers in the construction sector and social barriers in both sectors. Our results contribute to a more in-depth understanding of network function – barrier combinations for nature-based sustainability transitions, both in an urban and a rural context, which can help networks to further strategize and allocate their resources.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 105147"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204624001464/pdfft?md5=8c9398576ff22d84199ba7f3b47d32d2&pid=1-s2.0-S0169204624001464-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How can networks address barriers to nature-based solutions? The case of agriculture and construction in the Netherlands\",\"authors\":\"Maryse M.H. Chappin ,&nbsp;Maarten J. Punt ,&nbsp;Helen S. Toxopeus ,&nbsp;Nina van Tilburg ,&nbsp;Cathy L. de Jongh ,&nbsp;Hens A.C. Runhaar ,&nbsp;Godelieve H.J. Spaas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Nature-based solutions (NBS) can play a critical role in sustainability transitions in both urban and rural areas, but their uptake is hindered by a wide variety of barriers. While networks have been identified as a support structure for mainstreaming NBS, it is unclear what specific roles networks play in addressing the multiple barriers that NBS mainstreaming faces. Through qualitative research using focus group meetings and semi-structured interviews within two sectors in the Netherlands where attempts towards a nature-based transition are observed – i.e., agriculture and construction – we identify seven different functions through which networks address six specific barrier categories. We find <em>broad</em> network functions (e.g., knowledge sharing) that address multiple types of barriers simultaneously and <em>targeted</em> network functions (e.g., lobbying towards policy makers) aimed at alleviating one specific type of barrier. We also document that networks leave certain barriers unaddressed, such as technological and political barriers in the construction sector and social barriers in both sectors. Our results contribute to a more in-depth understanding of network function – barrier combinations for nature-based sustainability transitions, both in an urban and a rural context, which can help networks to further strategize and allocate their resources.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Landscape and Urban Planning\",\"volume\":\"251 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204624001464/pdfft?md5=8c9398576ff22d84199ba7f3b47d32d2&pid=1-s2.0-S0169204624001464-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Landscape and Urban Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204624001464\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204624001464","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于自然的解决方案(NBS)可在城市和农村地区的可持续性转型中发挥关键作用,但其应用却受到各种障碍的阻碍。虽然网络被认为是将自然解决方案主流化的支持结构,但目前还不清楚网络在解决自然解决方案主流化所面临的多重障碍方面发挥了哪些具体作用。通过在荷兰农业和建筑业这两个尝试向以自然为基础的转型的行业中使用焦点小组会议和半结构化访谈进行定性研究,我们确定了网络在解决六类特定障碍时所发挥的七种不同功能。我们发现,广泛的网络功能(如知识共享)可同时解决多种类型的障碍,而有针对性的网络功能(如游说政策制定者)则旨在减轻某一特定类型的障碍。我们还发现,网络会忽略某些障碍,如建筑部门的技术和政治障碍以及这两个部门的社会障碍。我们的研究结果有助于更深入地了解网络功能--在城市和农村背景下基于自然的可持续性转型的障碍组合,这有助于网络进一步制定战略和分配资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How can networks address barriers to nature-based solutions? The case of agriculture and construction in the Netherlands

Nature-based solutions (NBS) can play a critical role in sustainability transitions in both urban and rural areas, but their uptake is hindered by a wide variety of barriers. While networks have been identified as a support structure for mainstreaming NBS, it is unclear what specific roles networks play in addressing the multiple barriers that NBS mainstreaming faces. Through qualitative research using focus group meetings and semi-structured interviews within two sectors in the Netherlands where attempts towards a nature-based transition are observed – i.e., agriculture and construction – we identify seven different functions through which networks address six specific barrier categories. We find broad network functions (e.g., knowledge sharing) that address multiple types of barriers simultaneously and targeted network functions (e.g., lobbying towards policy makers) aimed at alleviating one specific type of barrier. We also document that networks leave certain barriers unaddressed, such as technological and political barriers in the construction sector and social barriers in both sectors. Our results contribute to a more in-depth understanding of network function – barrier combinations for nature-based sustainability transitions, both in an urban and a rural context, which can help networks to further strategize and allocate their resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Landscape and Urban Planning
Landscape and Urban Planning 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.60%
发文量
232
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.
期刊最新文献
Who values urban open spaces? investigating heterogeneity in the capitalization of open space in New York city Editorial Board The planning of urban–rural linkages: An automated content analysis of spatial plans adopted by European intermediate cities Not or Yes in My Back Yard? A physiological and psychological measurement of urban residents in Taiwan Homelessness and nature across landscapes and disciplines: A literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1