利用解释性结构建模研究人工智能在商业中的局限性以及人类洞察力的必要性

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100338
Mohammad Alawamleh , Natalie Shammas , Kamal Alawamleh , Loiy Bani Ismail
{"title":"利用解释性结构建模研究人工智能在商业中的局限性以及人类洞察力的必要性","authors":"Mohammad Alawamleh ,&nbsp;Natalie Shammas ,&nbsp;Kamal Alawamleh ,&nbsp;Loiy Bani Ismail","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in business settings is rapidly increasing, yet significant limitations hinder its effective use and adoption. Understanding these limitations and their interrelationships is crucial for enhancing AI implementation. Despite growing research, there is a lack of a comprehensive model that systematically identifies and elucidates the factors influencing AI limitations in business environments. This study employs Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM), combined with MICMAC analysis and an extensive literature review, to develop such a model. We identified 15 key factors and analyzed their driving and dependence powers to understand their interrelationships. Most factors, such as contextual understanding, transparency, intuition, emotional intelligence, ethics, bias, tacit knowledge, creativity, credibility, and reliability, were found to be autonomous. Accountability and privacy emerged as the strongest driving forces, while trust and adaptability exhibited the highest dependence and lowest driving power. This research offers a comprehensive understanding of AI limitations and their interrelationships, providing valuable insights for managers and businesses. The findings can aid in making more informed decisions about AI implementation and in developing strategies to mitigate these limitations. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the importance of combining AI with human insight to overcome these challenges. However, using the ISM technique could involve subjective judgment from the experts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S219985312400132X/pdfft?md5=68c5b2f51157fb6dcd0222bf89fc4177&pid=1-s2.0-S219985312400132X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the limitations of AI in business and the need for human insights using Interpretive Structural Modelling\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Alawamleh ,&nbsp;Natalie Shammas ,&nbsp;Kamal Alawamleh ,&nbsp;Loiy Bani Ismail\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in business settings is rapidly increasing, yet significant limitations hinder its effective use and adoption. Understanding these limitations and their interrelationships is crucial for enhancing AI implementation. Despite growing research, there is a lack of a comprehensive model that systematically identifies and elucidates the factors influencing AI limitations in business environments. This study employs Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM), combined with MICMAC analysis and an extensive literature review, to develop such a model. We identified 15 key factors and analyzed their driving and dependence powers to understand their interrelationships. Most factors, such as contextual understanding, transparency, intuition, emotional intelligence, ethics, bias, tacit knowledge, creativity, credibility, and reliability, were found to be autonomous. Accountability and privacy emerged as the strongest driving forces, while trust and adaptability exhibited the highest dependence and lowest driving power. This research offers a comprehensive understanding of AI limitations and their interrelationships, providing valuable insights for managers and businesses. The findings can aid in making more informed decisions about AI implementation and in developing strategies to mitigate these limitations. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the importance of combining AI with human insight to overcome these challenges. However, using the ISM technique could involve subjective judgment from the experts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S219985312400132X/pdfft?md5=68c5b2f51157fb6dcd0222bf89fc4177&pid=1-s2.0-S219985312400132X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S219985312400132X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S219985312400132X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)在商业环境中的整合正在迅速增加,但其有效使用和采用却受到了重大限制。了解这些局限性及其相互关系对于加强人工智能的实施至关重要。尽管研究日益增多,但目前还缺乏一个全面的模型来系统地识别和阐明影响商业环境中人工智能局限性的因素。本研究采用解释性结构模型(ISM),结合 MICMAC 分析和广泛的文献综述,建立了这样一个模型。我们确定了 15 个关键因素,并分析了它们的驱动力和依赖力,以了解它们之间的相互关系。结果发现,大多数因素,如背景理解、透明度、直觉、情商、道德、偏见、隐性知识、创造力、可信度和可靠性,都是自主的。责任和隐私成为最强的驱动力,而信任和适应性则表现出最高的依赖性和最低的驱动力。这项研究全面了解了人工智能的局限性及其相互关系,为管理者和企业提供了宝贵的见解。研究结果有助于就人工智能的实施做出更明智的决策,并制定战略来减少这些限制。此外,研究还强调了将人工智能与人类洞察力相结合以克服这些挑战的重要性。不过,使用 ISM 技术可能涉及专家的主观判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining the limitations of AI in business and the need for human insights using Interpretive Structural Modelling

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in business settings is rapidly increasing, yet significant limitations hinder its effective use and adoption. Understanding these limitations and their interrelationships is crucial for enhancing AI implementation. Despite growing research, there is a lack of a comprehensive model that systematically identifies and elucidates the factors influencing AI limitations in business environments. This study employs Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM), combined with MICMAC analysis and an extensive literature review, to develop such a model. We identified 15 key factors and analyzed their driving and dependence powers to understand their interrelationships. Most factors, such as contextual understanding, transparency, intuition, emotional intelligence, ethics, bias, tacit knowledge, creativity, credibility, and reliability, were found to be autonomous. Accountability and privacy emerged as the strongest driving forces, while trust and adaptability exhibited the highest dependence and lowest driving power. This research offers a comprehensive understanding of AI limitations and their interrelationships, providing valuable insights for managers and businesses. The findings can aid in making more informed decisions about AI implementation and in developing strategies to mitigate these limitations. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the importance of combining AI with human insight to overcome these challenges. However, using the ISM technique could involve subjective judgment from the experts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
196
审稿时长
1 day
期刊最新文献
The synergy between human factors, public digitalization and public administration in the European context Substitution of workforce with robotics in the construction industry: A wise or witless approach Predicting the intention to install solar photovoltaic panels in emerging market: The role of consumer innovativeness, knowledge, and support for government incentives Logistics business management of provider in Thailand with smart logistics Open innovation between university-industry: A review of research trends and practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1