将员工偏好评估与条件强化相结合,加强有严重攻击性行为的成人寄宿机构的数据收集工作

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Behavior Analysis in Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI:10.1007/s40617-024-00961-x
John M. Guercio, Kimberley Frame, Trinity Hartnell, Lauren Rosen
{"title":"将员工偏好评估与条件强化相结合,加强有严重攻击性行为的成人寄宿机构的数据收集工作","authors":"John M. Guercio, Kimberley Frame, Trinity Hartnell, Lauren Rosen","doi":"10.1007/s40617-024-00961-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present article details the data collection behavior of residential staff employed in community-based settings for adults with intellectual disabilities and significant behavioral challenges. The staff members who participated in the study were responsible for collecting behavioral data related to episodes of aggressive behavior that were observed in their residential settings. A descriptive analysis data collection system was in place for each of the residences in the study. Individualized preference assessments were performed with a representative staff member from each of the homes. Once a highly preferred item was identified by the staff person, they were able to earn the item that had been identified contingent upon data collection in the house meeting or exceeding 80% completion of their daily data expectations. The assessment and intervention were examined across all three of the residences in the study via a multiple baseline design with a reversal design embedded within one of the legs of the design. The results demonstrated increases in data collection across each of the residences in the study as the intervention was introduced at each of the sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":47310,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Analysis in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blending Staff Preference Assessments and Contingent Reinforcement to Enhance Data Collection in a Residential Facility for Adults with Severe Aggressive Behavior\",\"authors\":\"John M. Guercio, Kimberley Frame, Trinity Hartnell, Lauren Rosen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40617-024-00961-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The present article details the data collection behavior of residential staff employed in community-based settings for adults with intellectual disabilities and significant behavioral challenges. The staff members who participated in the study were responsible for collecting behavioral data related to episodes of aggressive behavior that were observed in their residential settings. A descriptive analysis data collection system was in place for each of the residences in the study. Individualized preference assessments were performed with a representative staff member from each of the homes. Once a highly preferred item was identified by the staff person, they were able to earn the item that had been identified contingent upon data collection in the house meeting or exceeding 80% completion of their daily data expectations. The assessment and intervention were examined across all three of the residences in the study via a multiple baseline design with a reversal design embedded within one of the legs of the design. The results demonstrated increases in data collection across each of the residences in the study as the intervention was introduced at each of the sites.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavior Analysis in Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavior Analysis in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-024-00961-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Analysis in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-024-00961-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文详细介绍了受雇于社区机构、为有智力障碍和严重行为障碍的成年人提供服务的住宿员工的数据收集行为。参与研究的工作人员负责收集在其居住环境中观察到的攻击行为发作的相关行为数据。研究中的每个居住地都建立了描述性分析数据收集系统。每所养老院都有一名具有代表性的工作人员进行个性化偏好评估。一旦工作人员确定了高度偏好的项目,他们就可以获得已确定的项目,但条件是院舍的数据收集必须达到或超过其日常数据预期完成率的 80%。这项研究通过多基线设计对所有三个宿舍的评估和干预措施进行了检查,并在其中一个设计中嵌入了逆转设计。结果表明,随着干预措施在各个地点的引入,研究中每个宿舍的数据收集量都有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Blending Staff Preference Assessments and Contingent Reinforcement to Enhance Data Collection in a Residential Facility for Adults with Severe Aggressive Behavior

The present article details the data collection behavior of residential staff employed in community-based settings for adults with intellectual disabilities and significant behavioral challenges. The staff members who participated in the study were responsible for collecting behavioral data related to episodes of aggressive behavior that were observed in their residential settings. A descriptive analysis data collection system was in place for each of the residences in the study. Individualized preference assessments were performed with a representative staff member from each of the homes. Once a highly preferred item was identified by the staff person, they were able to earn the item that had been identified contingent upon data collection in the house meeting or exceeding 80% completion of their daily data expectations. The assessment and intervention were examined across all three of the residences in the study via a multiple baseline design with a reversal design embedded within one of the legs of the design. The results demonstrated increases in data collection across each of the residences in the study as the intervention was introduced at each of the sites.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavior Analysis in Practice
Behavior Analysis in Practice PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
自引率
18.20%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Behavior Analysis in Practice, an official journal of the Association for Behavior Analysis International, is a peer-reviewed translational publication designed to provide science-based, best-practice information relevant to service delivery in behavior analysis. The target audience includes front-line service workers and their supervisors, scientist-practitioners, and school personnel. The mission of Behavior Analysis in Practice is to promote empirically validated best practices in an accessible format that describes not only what works, but also the challenges of implementation in practical settings. Types of articles and topics published  include empirical reports describing the application and evaluation of behavior-analytic procedures and programs; discussion papers on professional and practice issues; technical articles on methods, data analysis, or instrumentation in the practice of behavior analysis; tutorials on terms, procedures, and theories relevant to best practices in behavior analysis; and critical reviews of books and products that are aimed at practitioners or consumers of behavior analysis.
期刊最新文献
Facilitating Greater Understanding of Trauma-Informed Care in Applied Behavior Analysis: An Introduction to the Special Issue. The Effectiveness of Khan Academy in Teaching Elementary Math Procedural Integrity in Applied Settings: A Survey of Training, Practices, and Barriers Introducing "In Their Own Words" Special Series. Barriers to Careers in Behavior Analysis among Hispanic and Latinx Undergraduate Students: A Preliminary Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1