鳞翅目害虫对苏云金芽孢杆菌毒素的抗性:田间和实验室演化抗性和交叉抗性的证据、抗性遗传方式、适应性成本、相关机制和管理方案

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Toxins Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI:10.3390/toxins16070315
Muhammad Babar Shahzad Afzal, Mamuna Ijaz, Naeem Abbas, Sarfraz Ali Shad, José Eduardo Serrão
{"title":"鳞翅目害虫对苏云金芽孢杆菌毒素的抗性:田间和实验室演化抗性和交叉抗性的证据、抗性遗传方式、适应性成本、相关机制和管理方案","authors":"Muhammad Babar Shahzad Afzal, Mamuna Ijaz, Naeem Abbas, Sarfraz Ali Shad, José Eduardo Serrão","doi":"10.3390/toxins16070315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins are potential alternatives to synthetic insecticides for the control of lepidopteran pests. However, the evolution of resistance in some insect pest populations is a threat and can reduce the effectiveness of Bt toxins. In this review, we summarize the results of 161 studies from 20 countries reporting field and laboratory-evolved resistance, cross-resistance, and inheritance, mechanisms, and fitness costs of resistance to different Bt toxins. The studies refer mainly to insects from the United States of America (70), followed by China (31), Brazil (19), India (12), Malaysia (9), Spain (3), and Australia (3). The majority of the studies revealed that most of the pest populations showed susceptibility and a lack of cross-resistance to Bt toxins. Factors that delay resistance include recessive inheritance of resistance, the low initial frequency of resistant alleles, increased fitness costs, abundant refuges of non-Bt, and pyramided Bt crops. The results of field and laboratory resistance, cross-resistance, and inheritance, mechanisms, and fitness cost of resistance are advantageous for predicting the threat of future resistance and making effective strategies to sustain the effectiveness of Bt crops.","PeriodicalId":23119,"journal":{"name":"Toxins","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resistance of Lepidopteran Pests to Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins: Evidence of Field and Laboratory Evolved Resistance and Cross-Resistance, Mode of Resistance Inheritance, Fitness Costs, Mechanisms Involved and Management Options\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Babar Shahzad Afzal, Mamuna Ijaz, Naeem Abbas, Sarfraz Ali Shad, José Eduardo Serrão\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/toxins16070315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins are potential alternatives to synthetic insecticides for the control of lepidopteran pests. However, the evolution of resistance in some insect pest populations is a threat and can reduce the effectiveness of Bt toxins. In this review, we summarize the results of 161 studies from 20 countries reporting field and laboratory-evolved resistance, cross-resistance, and inheritance, mechanisms, and fitness costs of resistance to different Bt toxins. The studies refer mainly to insects from the United States of America (70), followed by China (31), Brazil (19), India (12), Malaysia (9), Spain (3), and Australia (3). The majority of the studies revealed that most of the pest populations showed susceptibility and a lack of cross-resistance to Bt toxins. Factors that delay resistance include recessive inheritance of resistance, the low initial frequency of resistant alleles, increased fitness costs, abundant refuges of non-Bt, and pyramided Bt crops. The results of field and laboratory resistance, cross-resistance, and inheritance, mechanisms, and fitness cost of resistance are advantageous for predicting the threat of future resistance and making effective strategies to sustain the effectiveness of Bt crops.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxins\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxins\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16070315\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxins","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16070315","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

苏云金芽孢杆菌(Bt)毒素是控制鳞翅目害虫的合成杀虫剂的潜在替代品。然而,一些害虫种群的抗药性进化是一种威胁,会降低 Bt 毒素的效果。在这篇综述中,我们总结了来自 20 个国家的 161 项研究的结果,这些研究报告了田间和实验室演化的抗药性、交叉抗药性以及对不同 Bt 毒素的抗药性的遗传、机制和适应成本。这些研究主要涉及美国(70 项)的昆虫,其次是中国(31 项)、巴西(19 项)、印度(12 项)、马来西亚(9 项)、西班牙(3 项)和澳大利亚(3 项)。大多数研究表明,大多数害虫种群对 Bt 毒素表现出敏感性,缺乏交叉抗性。延迟产生抗性的因素包括:抗性的隐性遗传、抗性等位基因的初始频率较低、适应成本增加、非 Bt 的大量庇护所以及金字塔式的 Bt 作物。田间和实验室抗性、交叉抗性以及抗性的遗传、机制和适应性成本的研究结果,有利于预测未来抗性的威胁,并制定有效的策略来维持 Bt 作物的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Resistance of Lepidopteran Pests to Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins: Evidence of Field and Laboratory Evolved Resistance and Cross-Resistance, Mode of Resistance Inheritance, Fitness Costs, Mechanisms Involved and Management Options
Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins are potential alternatives to synthetic insecticides for the control of lepidopteran pests. However, the evolution of resistance in some insect pest populations is a threat and can reduce the effectiveness of Bt toxins. In this review, we summarize the results of 161 studies from 20 countries reporting field and laboratory-evolved resistance, cross-resistance, and inheritance, mechanisms, and fitness costs of resistance to different Bt toxins. The studies refer mainly to insects from the United States of America (70), followed by China (31), Brazil (19), India (12), Malaysia (9), Spain (3), and Australia (3). The majority of the studies revealed that most of the pest populations showed susceptibility and a lack of cross-resistance to Bt toxins. Factors that delay resistance include recessive inheritance of resistance, the low initial frequency of resistant alleles, increased fitness costs, abundant refuges of non-Bt, and pyramided Bt crops. The results of field and laboratory resistance, cross-resistance, and inheritance, mechanisms, and fitness cost of resistance are advantageous for predicting the threat of future resistance and making effective strategies to sustain the effectiveness of Bt crops.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Toxins
Toxins TOXICOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
765
审稿时长
16.24 days
期刊介绍: Toxins (ISSN 2072-6651) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to toxins and toxinology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
期刊最新文献
Thermoregulation Effects of Phoneutria nigriventer Isolated Toxins in Rats Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Diverse Expression of Scorpion Toxin Genes in Mesobuthus martensii The Contrasting Effects of Bothrops lanceolatus and Bothrops atrox Venom on Procoagulant Activity and Thrombus Stability under Blood Flow Conditions Astaxanthin Alleviates Hepatic Lipid Metabolic Dysregulation Induced by Microcystin-LR Exposure of Cattle Breeding Herds to Naturally Co-Contaminated Zearalenone and Deoxynivalenol: The Relevance of a Urinary Mycotoxin Monitoring System for Herd Health and Food Safety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1