观测到 50 千伏以下低硬 X 射线通量的太阳活动耀斑

IF 1.1 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Astronomy Letters-A Journal of Astronomy and Space Astrophysics Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI:10.1134/S1063773724700026
I. N. Sharykin, I. V. Zimovets, A. G. Kosovichev, I. I. Myshyakov
{"title":"观测到 50 千伏以下低硬 X 射线通量的太阳活动耀斑","authors":"I. N. Sharykin,&nbsp;I. V. Zimovets,&nbsp;A. G. Kosovichev,&nbsp;I. I. Myshyakov","doi":"10.1134/S1063773724700026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We consider the M1.1-class solar flare occurred on July 5, 2012, at <span>\\(06{:}49\\)</span> UT. This event is unique in that a helioseismic perturbation was detected in it despite its low hard X-ray flux in the 25–50 keV energy band and its very soft hard X-ray spectrum. As a rule, most of the known sunquakes have been detected in solar flares with large hard X-ray fluxes at high energies (at least up to 100–300 keV). The event under consideration contradicts the popular hypothesis about the generation of sunquakes by beams of accelerated high-energy electrons. An analysis of the available RHESSI X-ray spectra shows that they can be explained in two ways. The X-ray spectrum in the 25–50 keV energy band is explained by a power-law distribution of accelerated electrons with an power-law index of 7–9 or by the presence of a superhot plasma with a temperature <span>\\(T\\sim 30\\)</span>–60 MK. In both cases, we are dealing with electrons of relatively low energies that either were responsible for the sunquake generation or should be considered as a secondary (accompanying) phenomenon with respect to the true cause of the photospheric perturbation. The results of a joint analysis of the X-ray and microwave spectra are presented for the first time for a helioseismically active solar flare. Our analysis shows that the spectra in both ranges can be well explained by the emission of a superhot magnetized plasma and not by accelerated electrons with a soft spectrum. However, the explanation of the spectra when considering partially magnetically trapped accelerated electrons is also possible. We have estimated the parameters of the thermal plasma, accelerated electrons, and energy fluxes of various types. We analyze the dynamics of ultraviolet and X-ray emission sources. We also present an analysis of the magnetic field structure based on vector magnetograms and the nonlinear force-free coronal magnetic field extrapolation. We discuss the mechanisms for the generation of the helioseismic perturbation during the solar flare under consideration. An eruptive process could probably be both primary and secondary causes of the sunquake. The appearance of a superhot plasma in the corona could give rise to propagating thermal fronts into the lower layers of the solar atmosphere, where helioseismic waves are excited. Our analysis does not allow the possibility of the sunquake generation by accelerated electrons with a soft spectrum to be ruled out either.</p>","PeriodicalId":55443,"journal":{"name":"Astronomy Letters-A Journal of Astronomy and Space Astrophysics","volume":"50 3","pages":"203 - 219"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observation of a Helioseismically Active Solar Flare with a Low Hard X-ray Flux up to 50 keV\",\"authors\":\"I. N. Sharykin,&nbsp;I. V. Zimovets,&nbsp;A. G. Kosovichev,&nbsp;I. I. Myshyakov\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/S1063773724700026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We consider the M1.1-class solar flare occurred on July 5, 2012, at <span>\\\\(06{:}49\\\\)</span> UT. This event is unique in that a helioseismic perturbation was detected in it despite its low hard X-ray flux in the 25–50 keV energy band and its very soft hard X-ray spectrum. As a rule, most of the known sunquakes have been detected in solar flares with large hard X-ray fluxes at high energies (at least up to 100–300 keV). The event under consideration contradicts the popular hypothesis about the generation of sunquakes by beams of accelerated high-energy electrons. An analysis of the available RHESSI X-ray spectra shows that they can be explained in two ways. The X-ray spectrum in the 25–50 keV energy band is explained by a power-law distribution of accelerated electrons with an power-law index of 7–9 or by the presence of a superhot plasma with a temperature <span>\\\\(T\\\\sim 30\\\\)</span>–60 MK. In both cases, we are dealing with electrons of relatively low energies that either were responsible for the sunquake generation or should be considered as a secondary (accompanying) phenomenon with respect to the true cause of the photospheric perturbation. The results of a joint analysis of the X-ray and microwave spectra are presented for the first time for a helioseismically active solar flare. Our analysis shows that the spectra in both ranges can be well explained by the emission of a superhot magnetized plasma and not by accelerated electrons with a soft spectrum. However, the explanation of the spectra when considering partially magnetically trapped accelerated electrons is also possible. We have estimated the parameters of the thermal plasma, accelerated electrons, and energy fluxes of various types. We analyze the dynamics of ultraviolet and X-ray emission sources. We also present an analysis of the magnetic field structure based on vector magnetograms and the nonlinear force-free coronal magnetic field extrapolation. We discuss the mechanisms for the generation of the helioseismic perturbation during the solar flare under consideration. An eruptive process could probably be both primary and secondary causes of the sunquake. The appearance of a superhot plasma in the corona could give rise to propagating thermal fronts into the lower layers of the solar atmosphere, where helioseismic waves are excited. Our analysis does not allow the possibility of the sunquake generation by accelerated electrons with a soft spectrum to be ruled out either.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Astronomy Letters-A Journal of Astronomy and Space Astrophysics\",\"volume\":\"50 3\",\"pages\":\"203 - 219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Astronomy Letters-A Journal of Astronomy and Space Astrophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1063773724700026\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astronomy Letters-A Journal of Astronomy and Space Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1063773724700026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

AbstractWe consider the M1.1-class solar flare occurred on July 5, 2012, at \(06{:}49\) UT.这一事件的独特之处在于,尽管它在25-50keV能段的硬X射线通量很低,而且它的硬X射线能谱非常软,但还是探测到了日震扰动。通常情况下,大多数已知的日震都是在高能量(至少达到 100-300 千伏)硬 X 射线通量大的太阳耀斑中探测到的。目前研究的事件与流行的由加速的高能电子束产生日震的假说相矛盾。对现有 RHESSI X 射线光谱的分析表明,可以从两个方面对其进行解释。25-50keV能段的X射线光谱可以用幂律指数为7-9的加速电子的幂律分布来解释,或者用温度为(T/sim 30\)-60 MK的超热等离子体的存在来解释。在这两种情况下,我们处理的都是能量相对较低的电子,它们要么是日震产生的原因,要么应被视为光球扰动真正原因的次要(伴随)现象。本文首次提出了对日震活跃的太阳耀斑的 X 射线和微波光谱进行联合分析的结果。我们的分析表明,两个范围内的光谱都可以很好地解释为超热磁化等离子体的发射,而不是具有软光谱的加速电子。不过,考虑到部分磁困住的加速电子也可以解释光谱。我们估算了热等离子体、加速电子和各类能量通量的参数。我们分析了紫外线和 X 射线发射源的动态。我们还根据矢量磁图和非线性无力日冕磁场外推分析了磁场结构。我们讨论了太阳耀斑期间日震扰动的产生机制。爆发过程可能是日震的主要和次要原因。日冕中超高温等离子体的出现可能导致热锋面向太阳大气低层传播,从而激发日震波。我们的分析也不能排除由具有软光谱的加速电子产生日震的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Observation of a Helioseismically Active Solar Flare with a Low Hard X-ray Flux up to 50 keV

We consider the M1.1-class solar flare occurred on July 5, 2012, at \(06{:}49\) UT. This event is unique in that a helioseismic perturbation was detected in it despite its low hard X-ray flux in the 25–50 keV energy band and its very soft hard X-ray spectrum. As a rule, most of the known sunquakes have been detected in solar flares with large hard X-ray fluxes at high energies (at least up to 100–300 keV). The event under consideration contradicts the popular hypothesis about the generation of sunquakes by beams of accelerated high-energy electrons. An analysis of the available RHESSI X-ray spectra shows that they can be explained in two ways. The X-ray spectrum in the 25–50 keV energy band is explained by a power-law distribution of accelerated electrons with an power-law index of 7–9 or by the presence of a superhot plasma with a temperature \(T\sim 30\)–60 MK. In both cases, we are dealing with electrons of relatively low energies that either were responsible for the sunquake generation or should be considered as a secondary (accompanying) phenomenon with respect to the true cause of the photospheric perturbation. The results of a joint analysis of the X-ray and microwave spectra are presented for the first time for a helioseismically active solar flare. Our analysis shows that the spectra in both ranges can be well explained by the emission of a superhot magnetized plasma and not by accelerated electrons with a soft spectrum. However, the explanation of the spectra when considering partially magnetically trapped accelerated electrons is also possible. We have estimated the parameters of the thermal plasma, accelerated electrons, and energy fluxes of various types. We analyze the dynamics of ultraviolet and X-ray emission sources. We also present an analysis of the magnetic field structure based on vector magnetograms and the nonlinear force-free coronal magnetic field extrapolation. We discuss the mechanisms for the generation of the helioseismic perturbation during the solar flare under consideration. An eruptive process could probably be both primary and secondary causes of the sunquake. The appearance of a superhot plasma in the corona could give rise to propagating thermal fronts into the lower layers of the solar atmosphere, where helioseismic waves are excited. Our analysis does not allow the possibility of the sunquake generation by accelerated electrons with a soft spectrum to be ruled out either.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
22.20%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Astronomy Letters is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes the results of original research on all aspects of modern astronomy and astrophysics including high energy astrophysics, cosmology, space astronomy, theoretical astrophysics, radio astronomy, extragalactic astronomy, stellar astronomy, and investigation of the Solar system.
期刊最新文献
Confirmation of the ‘‘Lost’’ Cycle and the Gnevyshev–Ohl Rule in a Series of Sunspot Areas Spanning 410 Years Passage of a Gamma-Ray Burst through a Molecular Cloud: The Absorption of Its Afterglow in the X-ray Wavelength Range Humps on the Profiles of the Radial-Velocity Distribution and the Age of the Galactic Bar Electrostatic Energy of Multicomponent Crystal Mixtures in the Interiors of Degenerate Stars Superluminous Supernova SN 2018ibb: Circumstellar Shell and Spectral Effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1