Kathleen Ahrens, Winnie Huiheng Zeng, Christian Burgers, Chu-Ren Huang
{"title":"隐喻与性别:与源领域相关的词语是否具有性别特征?","authors":"Kathleen Ahrens, Winnie Huiheng Zeng, Christian Burgers, Chu-Ren Huang","doi":"10.1515/lingvan-2024-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conceptual metaphors are one of many linguistic devices that can potentially encode and reinforce gender stereotypes. However, little is known about how metaphors encode gender stereotypes, and in previous literature the concept of “gendered metaphor” has been mostly assumed rather than attested. We take the first step to tackle this issue by examining the gender typicality of specific metaphorical source domains. In the present paper, we conducted three rating experiments (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> <jats:sub> <jats:italic>total</jats:italic> </jats:sub> = 1,060 English-speaking participants) to determine the genderedness of 50 keywords associated with five frequently used source domains (<jats:sc>building, competition, journey, plant,</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>war</jats:sc>). We found that keywords associated with three source domains (<jats:sc>building, competition,</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>war</jats:sc>) were viewed as more masculine, while keywords associated with the source domains of <jats:sc>journey</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>plant</jats:sc> were viewed as more feminine. These data offer empirical verification for gendered perceptions of keywords associated with some frequently used source domains. The result also provides the first evidence that metaphors could encode gender stereotypes by selection of source domains.","PeriodicalId":55960,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics Vanguard","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metaphor and gender: are words associated with source domains perceived in a gendered way?\",\"authors\":\"Kathleen Ahrens, Winnie Huiheng Zeng, Christian Burgers, Chu-Ren Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/lingvan-2024-0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Conceptual metaphors are one of many linguistic devices that can potentially encode and reinforce gender stereotypes. However, little is known about how metaphors encode gender stereotypes, and in previous literature the concept of “gendered metaphor” has been mostly assumed rather than attested. We take the first step to tackle this issue by examining the gender typicality of specific metaphorical source domains. In the present paper, we conducted three rating experiments (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> <jats:sub> <jats:italic>total</jats:italic> </jats:sub> = 1,060 English-speaking participants) to determine the genderedness of 50 keywords associated with five frequently used source domains (<jats:sc>building, competition, journey, plant,</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>war</jats:sc>). We found that keywords associated with three source domains (<jats:sc>building, competition,</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>war</jats:sc>) were viewed as more masculine, while keywords associated with the source domains of <jats:sc>journey</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>plant</jats:sc> were viewed as more feminine. These data offer empirical verification for gendered perceptions of keywords associated with some frequently used source domains. The result also provides the first evidence that metaphors could encode gender stereotypes by selection of source domains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistics Vanguard\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistics Vanguard\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2024-0021\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics Vanguard","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2024-0021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Metaphor and gender: are words associated with source domains perceived in a gendered way?
Conceptual metaphors are one of many linguistic devices that can potentially encode and reinforce gender stereotypes. However, little is known about how metaphors encode gender stereotypes, and in previous literature the concept of “gendered metaphor” has been mostly assumed rather than attested. We take the first step to tackle this issue by examining the gender typicality of specific metaphorical source domains. In the present paper, we conducted three rating experiments (Ntotal = 1,060 English-speaking participants) to determine the genderedness of 50 keywords associated with five frequently used source domains (building, competition, journey, plant, and war). We found that keywords associated with three source domains (building, competition, and war) were viewed as more masculine, while keywords associated with the source domains of journey and plant were viewed as more feminine. These data offer empirical verification for gendered perceptions of keywords associated with some frequently used source domains. The result also provides the first evidence that metaphors could encode gender stereotypes by selection of source domains.
期刊介绍:
Linguistics Vanguard is a new channel for high quality articles and innovative approaches in all major fields of linguistics. This multimodal journal is published solely online and provides an accessible platform supporting both traditional and new kinds of publications. Linguistics Vanguard seeks to publish concise and up-to-date reports on the state of the art in linguistics as well as cutting-edge research papers. With its topical breadth of coverage and anticipated quick rate of production, it is one of the leading platforms for scientific exchange in linguistics. Its broad theoretical range, international scope, and diversity of article formats engage students and scholars alike. All topics within linguistics are welcome. The journal especially encourages submissions taking advantage of its new multimodal platform designed to integrate interactive content, including audio and video, images, maps, software code, raw data, and any other media that enhances the traditional written word. The novel platform and concise article format allows for rapid turnaround of submissions. Full peer review assures quality and enables authors to receive appropriate credit for their work. The journal publishes general submissions as well as special collections. Ideas for special collections may be submitted to the editors for consideration.