隐喻与性别:与源领域相关的词语是否具有性别特征?

IF 1.1 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Linguistics Vanguard Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1515/lingvan-2024-0021
Kathleen Ahrens, Winnie Huiheng Zeng, Christian Burgers, Chu-Ren Huang
{"title":"隐喻与性别:与源领域相关的词语是否具有性别特征?","authors":"Kathleen Ahrens, Winnie Huiheng Zeng, Christian Burgers, Chu-Ren Huang","doi":"10.1515/lingvan-2024-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conceptual metaphors are one of many linguistic devices that can potentially encode and reinforce gender stereotypes. However, little is known about how metaphors encode gender stereotypes, and in previous literature the concept of “gendered metaphor” has been mostly assumed rather than attested. We take the first step to tackle this issue by examining the gender typicality of specific metaphorical source domains. In the present paper, we conducted three rating experiments (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> <jats:sub> <jats:italic>total</jats:italic> </jats:sub> = 1,060 English-speaking participants) to determine the genderedness of 50 keywords associated with five frequently used source domains (<jats:sc>building, competition, journey, plant,</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>war</jats:sc>). We found that keywords associated with three source domains (<jats:sc>building, competition,</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>war</jats:sc>) were viewed as more masculine, while keywords associated with the source domains of <jats:sc>journey</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>plant</jats:sc> were viewed as more feminine. These data offer empirical verification for gendered perceptions of keywords associated with some frequently used source domains. The result also provides the first evidence that metaphors could encode gender stereotypes by selection of source domains.","PeriodicalId":55960,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics Vanguard","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metaphor and gender: are words associated with source domains perceived in a gendered way?\",\"authors\":\"Kathleen Ahrens, Winnie Huiheng Zeng, Christian Burgers, Chu-Ren Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/lingvan-2024-0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Conceptual metaphors are one of many linguistic devices that can potentially encode and reinforce gender stereotypes. However, little is known about how metaphors encode gender stereotypes, and in previous literature the concept of “gendered metaphor” has been mostly assumed rather than attested. We take the first step to tackle this issue by examining the gender typicality of specific metaphorical source domains. In the present paper, we conducted three rating experiments (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> <jats:sub> <jats:italic>total</jats:italic> </jats:sub> = 1,060 English-speaking participants) to determine the genderedness of 50 keywords associated with five frequently used source domains (<jats:sc>building, competition, journey, plant,</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>war</jats:sc>). We found that keywords associated with three source domains (<jats:sc>building, competition,</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>war</jats:sc>) were viewed as more masculine, while keywords associated with the source domains of <jats:sc>journey</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>plant</jats:sc> were viewed as more feminine. These data offer empirical verification for gendered perceptions of keywords associated with some frequently used source domains. The result also provides the first evidence that metaphors could encode gender stereotypes by selection of source domains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistics Vanguard\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistics Vanguard\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2024-0021\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics Vanguard","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2024-0021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

概念隐喻是可能编码和强化性别刻板印象的众多语言工具之一。然而,人们对隐喻如何编码性别刻板印象知之甚少,在以往的文献中,"性别化隐喻 "的概念大多是假设而非证实。我们通过研究特定隐喻源域的性别典型性,迈出了解决这一问题的第一步。在本文中,我们进行了三次评分实验(总人数 = 1,060 名英语参与者),以确定与五个常用隐喻源域(建筑、竞争、旅程、植物和战争)相关的 50 个关键词的性别典型性。我们发现,与三个词源域(建筑、竞争和战争)相关的关键词被认为更男性化,而与旅程和植物词源域相关的关键词被认为更女性化。这些数据从实证角度验证了人们对一些常用来源域相关关键词的性别认知。这一结果也首次证明了隐喻可以通过选择源域来编码性别刻板印象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Metaphor and gender: are words associated with source domains perceived in a gendered way?
Conceptual metaphors are one of many linguistic devices that can potentially encode and reinforce gender stereotypes. However, little is known about how metaphors encode gender stereotypes, and in previous literature the concept of “gendered metaphor” has been mostly assumed rather than attested. We take the first step to tackle this issue by examining the gender typicality of specific metaphorical source domains. In the present paper, we conducted three rating experiments (N total = 1,060 English-speaking participants) to determine the genderedness of 50 keywords associated with five frequently used source domains (building, competition, journey, plant, and war). We found that keywords associated with three source domains (building, competition, and war) were viewed as more masculine, while keywords associated with the source domains of journey and plant were viewed as more feminine. These data offer empirical verification for gendered perceptions of keywords associated with some frequently used source domains. The result also provides the first evidence that metaphors could encode gender stereotypes by selection of source domains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
18.20%
发文量
105
期刊介绍: Linguistics Vanguard is a new channel for high quality articles and innovative approaches in all major fields of linguistics. This multimodal journal is published solely online and provides an accessible platform supporting both traditional and new kinds of publications. Linguistics Vanguard seeks to publish concise and up-to-date reports on the state of the art in linguistics as well as cutting-edge research papers. With its topical breadth of coverage and anticipated quick rate of production, it is one of the leading platforms for scientific exchange in linguistics. Its broad theoretical range, international scope, and diversity of article formats engage students and scholars alike. All topics within linguistics are welcome. The journal especially encourages submissions taking advantage of its new multimodal platform designed to integrate interactive content, including audio and video, images, maps, software code, raw data, and any other media that enhances the traditional written word. The novel platform and concise article format allows for rapid turnaround of submissions. Full peer review assures quality and enables authors to receive appropriate credit for their work. The journal publishes general submissions as well as special collections. Ideas for special collections may be submitted to the editors for consideration.
期刊最新文献
From sociolinguistic perception to strategic action in the study of social meaning. Sign recognition: the effect of parameters and features in sign mispronunciations. The use of the narrative final vowel -á by the Lingala-speaking youth of Kinshasa: from anterior to near/recent past Re-taking the field: resuming in-person fieldwork amid the COVID-19 pandemic Bibliographic bias and information-density sampling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1