腹横肌平面阻滞对腹腔镜结直肠手术患者术中横膈膜和呼吸功能的影响

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI:10.2147/tcrm.s462688
Yi Zhang, Yiqing Guo, Chao Gong, Junzuo Fu, Lianhua Chen
{"title":"腹横肌平面阻滞对腹腔镜结直肠手术患者术中横膈膜和呼吸功能的影响","authors":"Yi Zhang, Yiqing Guo, Chao Gong, Junzuo Fu, Lianhua Chen","doi":"10.2147/tcrm.s462688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Background:</strong> The positive roles of deep muscle relaxation in abdominal surgeries and transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) in the postoperative analgesia. This study aimed to discuss the effects of TAPB on abdominal muscle relaxation, the intraoperative diaphragmatic, and the respiratory functions.<br/><strong>Methods:</strong> The patients were randomly divided into the TAPB group who received single-shot TAPB bilaterally (n=30), and the control group who did not receive TAPB (n=30). Both groups keep the same steps for other procedures in the surgeries and anesthesia. Four time points for monitoring were defined: The moment when pneumoperitoneum pressure stabilized following endotracheal intubation and anesthetic induction (T0), appearance of the first incisure in the pressure-volume (P-V) loop (T1), appearance of the second incisure in the P-V loop (T2), and the moment with single stimulation (SS) =20% (T3). Primary observation parameters were SS1 measured by muscle relaxation monitoring at T1, and SS2 at T2. Secondary observation parameters included surgeon’s satisfaction with surgical field and respiratory dynamics at the four time points.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> The two groups were comparable in age, gender, BMI, ASA grade, and operation time. The TAPB group had a dramatic reduction in the total dose of intraoperative sufentanil (0.73± 0.21 ug/kg) compared with the control group (0.87± 0.18 ug/kg) (P=0.023); Other use of drug did not differ between the two groups. The two groups did not differ significantly in SS at either T1 (SS1) or T2 (SS2). In either group, surgeon’s satisfaction with surgical field at T1 and T2 decreased dramatically compared with T0 and T3 (all P&lt; 0.05). At each time point, the respiratory dynamics and the surgeon’s satisfaction with surgical field did not differ significantly between the two groups.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> TAPB reduced the use of intraoperative analgesics without altering the degree of abdominal relaxation, or affecting surgeon’s satisfaction with surgical field in the patients receiving laparoscopic colorectal surgery.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":22977,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Transverse Abdominis Plane Block on Intraoperative Diaphragmatic and Respiratory Functions in Patients Receiving Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery\",\"authors\":\"Yi Zhang, Yiqing Guo, Chao Gong, Junzuo Fu, Lianhua Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/tcrm.s462688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong>Background:</strong> The positive roles of deep muscle relaxation in abdominal surgeries and transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) in the postoperative analgesia. This study aimed to discuss the effects of TAPB on abdominal muscle relaxation, the intraoperative diaphragmatic, and the respiratory functions.<br/><strong>Methods:</strong> The patients were randomly divided into the TAPB group who received single-shot TAPB bilaterally (n=30), and the control group who did not receive TAPB (n=30). Both groups keep the same steps for other procedures in the surgeries and anesthesia. Four time points for monitoring were defined: The moment when pneumoperitoneum pressure stabilized following endotracheal intubation and anesthetic induction (T0), appearance of the first incisure in the pressure-volume (P-V) loop (T1), appearance of the second incisure in the P-V loop (T2), and the moment with single stimulation (SS) =20% (T3). Primary observation parameters were SS1 measured by muscle relaxation monitoring at T1, and SS2 at T2. Secondary observation parameters included surgeon’s satisfaction with surgical field and respiratory dynamics at the four time points.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> The two groups were comparable in age, gender, BMI, ASA grade, and operation time. The TAPB group had a dramatic reduction in the total dose of intraoperative sufentanil (0.73± 0.21 ug/kg) compared with the control group (0.87± 0.18 ug/kg) (P=0.023); Other use of drug did not differ between the two groups. The two groups did not differ significantly in SS at either T1 (SS1) or T2 (SS2). In either group, surgeon’s satisfaction with surgical field at T1 and T2 decreased dramatically compared with T0 and T3 (all P&lt; 0.05). At each time point, the respiratory dynamics and the surgeon’s satisfaction with surgical field did not differ significantly between the two groups.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> TAPB reduced the use of intraoperative analgesics without altering the degree of abdominal relaxation, or affecting surgeon’s satisfaction with surgical field in the patients receiving laparoscopic colorectal surgery.<br/><br/>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/tcrm.s462688\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/tcrm.s462688","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:深层肌肉松弛在腹部手术中的积极作用以及腹横肌平面阻滞(TAPB)在术后镇痛中的积极作用。本研究旨在探讨 TAPB 对腹部肌肉松弛、术中膈肌和呼吸功能的影响:方法:将患者随机分为接受双侧单次 TAPB 的 TAPB 组(30 人)和未接受 TAPB 的对照组(30 人)。两组在手术和麻醉方面的其他步骤相同。确定了四个监测时间点:气管插管和麻醉诱导后腹腔积气压力趋于稳定的时刻(T0)、压力-容积(P-V)回路中出现第一个切迹的时刻(T1)、P-V回路中出现第二个切迹的时刻(T2)以及单次刺激(SS)=20%的时刻(T3)。主要观察参数为 T1 时通过肌肉松弛监测测量的 SS1 和 T2 时的 SS2。次要观察参数包括外科医生对四个时间点的手术视野和呼吸动态的满意度:两组患者的年龄、性别、体重指数、ASA 分级和手术时间相当。与对照组(0.87± 0.18 ug/kg)相比,TAPB 组的术中舒芬太尼总剂量(0.73± 0.21 ug/kg)大幅减少(P=0.023);两组的其他用药量无差异。两组在 T1(SS1)或 T2(SS2)时的 SS 均无明显差异。与 T0 和 T3 相比,两组外科医生在 T1 和 T2 对手术视野的满意度均大幅下降(P< 0.05)。在每个时间点,两组的呼吸动力学和外科医生对手术视野的满意度均无显著差异:结论:TAPB减少了腹腔镜结直肠手术患者术中镇痛药的使用,但不会改变腹部松弛程度,也不会影响外科医生对手术视野的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of Transverse Abdominis Plane Block on Intraoperative Diaphragmatic and Respiratory Functions in Patients Receiving Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
Background: The positive roles of deep muscle relaxation in abdominal surgeries and transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) in the postoperative analgesia. This study aimed to discuss the effects of TAPB on abdominal muscle relaxation, the intraoperative diaphragmatic, and the respiratory functions.
Methods: The patients were randomly divided into the TAPB group who received single-shot TAPB bilaterally (n=30), and the control group who did not receive TAPB (n=30). Both groups keep the same steps for other procedures in the surgeries and anesthesia. Four time points for monitoring were defined: The moment when pneumoperitoneum pressure stabilized following endotracheal intubation and anesthetic induction (T0), appearance of the first incisure in the pressure-volume (P-V) loop (T1), appearance of the second incisure in the P-V loop (T2), and the moment with single stimulation (SS) =20% (T3). Primary observation parameters were SS1 measured by muscle relaxation monitoring at T1, and SS2 at T2. Secondary observation parameters included surgeon’s satisfaction with surgical field and respiratory dynamics at the four time points.
Results: The two groups were comparable in age, gender, BMI, ASA grade, and operation time. The TAPB group had a dramatic reduction in the total dose of intraoperative sufentanil (0.73± 0.21 ug/kg) compared with the control group (0.87± 0.18 ug/kg) (P=0.023); Other use of drug did not differ between the two groups. The two groups did not differ significantly in SS at either T1 (SS1) or T2 (SS2). In either group, surgeon’s satisfaction with surgical field at T1 and T2 decreased dramatically compared with T0 and T3 (all P< 0.05). At each time point, the respiratory dynamics and the surgeon’s satisfaction with surgical field did not differ significantly between the two groups.
Conclusion: TAPB reduced the use of intraoperative analgesics without altering the degree of abdominal relaxation, or affecting surgeon’s satisfaction with surgical field in the patients receiving laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
139
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies in all therapeutic areas, outcomes, safety, and programs for the effective, safe, and sustained use of medicines, therapeutic and surgical interventions in all clinical areas. The journal welcomes submissions covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary. The journal will consider case reports but only if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. As of 18th March 2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
期刊最新文献
Medications Associated with Geriatric Syndromes and Prescribing Patterns: The Impact of Excessive Polypharmacy in Older Adult Patients. Three Artificial Liver Models of Treatment of Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure. The Utility of Speckle Tracking Echocardiographic Parameters in Predicting Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation. Potentially Risk Factors for New Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Analysis of Influencing Factors and Construction of Predictive Model for Persistent Cough After Lung Cancer Resection Under Thoracoscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1