Samantha Bolten , Robert D. Ralyea , Timothy T. Lott , Renato H. Orsi , Nicole H. Martin , Martin Wiedmann , Aljosa Trmcic
{"title":"利用全基因组测序分析李斯特菌属在牧场乳品加工设施及其相关农场环境中的持久性和传播模式。","authors":"Samantha Bolten , Robert D. Ralyea , Timothy T. Lott , Renato H. Orsi , Nicole H. Martin , Martin Wiedmann , Aljosa Trmcic","doi":"10.3168/jds.2024-24789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Farmstead dairy processing facilities may be particularly susceptible to <em>Listeria</em> spp. contamination due to the close physical proximity of their processing environments (PE) to associated dairy farm environments (FE). In this case study, we supported the implementation of interventions focused on improving (1) cleaning and sanitation efficacy, (2) hygienic zoning, and (3) sanitary equipment and facility design and maintenance in a farmstead dairy processing facility, and evaluated their effect on <em>Listeria</em> spp. detection in the farmstead's PE over 1 yr. Detection of <em>Listeria</em> spp. in the farmstead's PE was numerically reduced from 50% to 7.5% after 1 yr of intervention implementation, suggesting that these interventions were effective at improving <em>Listeria</em> spp. control. In addition, environmental samples were also collected from the farmstead's FE to evaluate the risk of the FE as a potential source of <em>Listeria</em> spp. in the PE. Overall, detection of <em>Listeria</em> spp. was higher in samples collected from the FE (75%, 27/36) compared with samples collected from the PE (24%, 29/120). Whole-genome sequencing performed on select isolates collected from the PE and FE supported the identification of 6 clusters (range of 3 to 15 isolates per cluster) that showed ≤ 50 high-quality single nucleotide polymorphism differences. Of these 6 clusters, 3 (i.e., clusters 2, 4, and 5) contained isolates that were collected from both the PE and FE, suggesting that transmission between these 2 environments was likely. Moreover, all cluster 2 isolates represented a clonal complex of <em>L. monocytogenes</em> commonly associated with dairy farm environmental reservoirs (i.e., CC666), which may support that the farmstead's FE represented an upstream source of the cluster 2 isolates that were found in the PE. Overall, our data underscore that although the FE can represent a potential upstream source of <em>Listeria</em> spp. contamination in a farmstead dairy processing facility, implementation of targeted interventions can help effectively minimize <em>Listeria</em> spp. contamination in the PE.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dairy Science","volume":"107 11","pages":"Pages 9036-9053"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilizing whole-genome sequencing to characterize Listeria spp. persistence and transmission patterns in a farmstead dairy processing facility and its associated farm environment\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Bolten , Robert D. Ralyea , Timothy T. Lott , Renato H. Orsi , Nicole H. Martin , Martin Wiedmann , Aljosa Trmcic\",\"doi\":\"10.3168/jds.2024-24789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Farmstead dairy processing facilities may be particularly susceptible to <em>Listeria</em> spp. contamination due to the close physical proximity of their processing environments (PE) to associated dairy farm environments (FE). In this case study, we supported the implementation of interventions focused on improving (1) cleaning and sanitation efficacy, (2) hygienic zoning, and (3) sanitary equipment and facility design and maintenance in a farmstead dairy processing facility, and evaluated their effect on <em>Listeria</em> spp. detection in the farmstead's PE over 1 yr. Detection of <em>Listeria</em> spp. in the farmstead's PE was numerically reduced from 50% to 7.5% after 1 yr of intervention implementation, suggesting that these interventions were effective at improving <em>Listeria</em> spp. control. In addition, environmental samples were also collected from the farmstead's FE to evaluate the risk of the FE as a potential source of <em>Listeria</em> spp. in the PE. Overall, detection of <em>Listeria</em> spp. was higher in samples collected from the FE (75%, 27/36) compared with samples collected from the PE (24%, 29/120). Whole-genome sequencing performed on select isolates collected from the PE and FE supported the identification of 6 clusters (range of 3 to 15 isolates per cluster) that showed ≤ 50 high-quality single nucleotide polymorphism differences. Of these 6 clusters, 3 (i.e., clusters 2, 4, and 5) contained isolates that were collected from both the PE and FE, suggesting that transmission between these 2 environments was likely. Moreover, all cluster 2 isolates represented a clonal complex of <em>L. monocytogenes</em> commonly associated with dairy farm environmental reservoirs (i.e., CC666), which may support that the farmstead's FE represented an upstream source of the cluster 2 isolates that were found in the PE. Overall, our data underscore that although the FE can represent a potential upstream source of <em>Listeria</em> spp. contamination in a farmstead dairy processing facility, implementation of targeted interventions can help effectively minimize <em>Listeria</em> spp. contamination in the PE.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dairy Science\",\"volume\":\"107 11\",\"pages\":\"Pages 9036-9053\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dairy Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030224009950\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dairy Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030224009950","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
牧场乳品加工设施由于其加工环境(PE)与相关的奶牛场环境(FE)非常接近,因此特别容易受到李斯特菌污染。在本案例研究中,我们在一个牧场的乳品加工设施中支持实施了干预措施,重点是提高(i)清洁和卫生功效,(ii)卫生分区,以及(iii)卫生设备/设施的设计和维护,并评估了这些措施对牧场加工环境中李斯特菌检出的影响。干预措施实施 1 年后,牧场 PE 中李斯特菌的检出率从 50% 降至 7.5%,表明这些干预措施能有效改善李斯特菌的控制。此外,还从农场的农场设施中采集了环境样本,以评估农场设施作为 PE 中李斯特菌潜在来源的风险。总体而言,与 PE 样本(24%,29/120)相比,FE 样本(75%,27/36)的李斯特菌检出率更高。对从 PE 和 FE 采集到的部分分离物进行的全基因组测序(WGS)确定了 6 个群集(每个群集有 3 至 15 个分离物),这些群集显示出≤ 50 个高质量单核苷酸多态性(hqSNP)差异。在这 6 个聚类中,有 3 个(即聚类 2、4 和 5)包含从 PE 和 FE 采集到的分离物,这表明这两种环境之间可能存在传播。此外,第 2 群组的所有分离物都代表了一种常见于奶牛场环境库的单核细胞增多性乳酸杆菌克隆复合体(CC)(即 CC666),这可能证明牧场的 FE 是在 PE 中发现的第 2 群组分离物的上游来源。总之,我们的数据强调,虽然牧场乳制品加工设施中的食品加工厂可能是李斯特菌污染的上游来源,但实施有针对性的干预措施有助于有效地将 PE 中的李斯特菌污染降至最低。
Utilizing whole-genome sequencing to characterize Listeria spp. persistence and transmission patterns in a farmstead dairy processing facility and its associated farm environment
Farmstead dairy processing facilities may be particularly susceptible to Listeria spp. contamination due to the close physical proximity of their processing environments (PE) to associated dairy farm environments (FE). In this case study, we supported the implementation of interventions focused on improving (1) cleaning and sanitation efficacy, (2) hygienic zoning, and (3) sanitary equipment and facility design and maintenance in a farmstead dairy processing facility, and evaluated their effect on Listeria spp. detection in the farmstead's PE over 1 yr. Detection of Listeria spp. in the farmstead's PE was numerically reduced from 50% to 7.5% after 1 yr of intervention implementation, suggesting that these interventions were effective at improving Listeria spp. control. In addition, environmental samples were also collected from the farmstead's FE to evaluate the risk of the FE as a potential source of Listeria spp. in the PE. Overall, detection of Listeria spp. was higher in samples collected from the FE (75%, 27/36) compared with samples collected from the PE (24%, 29/120). Whole-genome sequencing performed on select isolates collected from the PE and FE supported the identification of 6 clusters (range of 3 to 15 isolates per cluster) that showed ≤ 50 high-quality single nucleotide polymorphism differences. Of these 6 clusters, 3 (i.e., clusters 2, 4, and 5) contained isolates that were collected from both the PE and FE, suggesting that transmission between these 2 environments was likely. Moreover, all cluster 2 isolates represented a clonal complex of L. monocytogenes commonly associated with dairy farm environmental reservoirs (i.e., CC666), which may support that the farmstead's FE represented an upstream source of the cluster 2 isolates that were found in the PE. Overall, our data underscore that although the FE can represent a potential upstream source of Listeria spp. contamination in a farmstead dairy processing facility, implementation of targeted interventions can help effectively minimize Listeria spp. contamination in the PE.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of the American Dairy Science Association®, Journal of Dairy Science® (JDS) is the leading peer-reviewed general dairy research journal in the world. JDS readers represent education, industry, and government agencies in more than 70 countries with interests in biochemistry, breeding, economics, engineering, environment, food science, genetics, microbiology, nutrition, pathology, physiology, processing, public health, quality assurance, and sanitation.